Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:52:05.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Status of Health Technology Assessment Worldwide: Results of an International Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Seymour Perry ,
Eric Gardner  and
Mae Thamer
Seymour Perry
Affiliation:
Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute, Inc.
Eric Gardner
Affiliation:
Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute, Inc.
Mae Thamer
Affiliation:
Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute, Inc.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Health technology assessment (HTA) has increasingly become a valuable tool to examine effectiveness, quality of care, patient outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of health care technologies. In 1994 and 1995, a survey was conducted to document the scope of worldwide HTA activities; 103 organizations from 24 countries responded. This paper summarizes the results of this international survey, including a description of each country's program, types of technologies assessed, methodologies used, and dissemination approaches. Results for Canada, the United States, and European and other countries are presented separately.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , Winter 1997 , pp. 81 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Banta, H. D., Ootwijn, W. J., & van Beekum, W.T.The organization of health care technology assessment in the Netherlands. The Hague, Netherlands: Rathenau Institute, 1995.Google Scholar
2.Battista, R. N., & Hodge, M. J.The development of health technology assessment: An international perspective. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1995, 11, 287–300.Google Scholar
3. Blue Cross Blue Shield, news release. Blues awarded government contract for technology assessment, 10 31, 1995.Google Scholar
4.Fuchs, V. R., & Garber, A. M.The new technology assessment. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 673–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Goodman, C., (ed.) Medical technology assessment directory: A pilot reference to organizations, assessments, and information resources. Council on Health Care Technology, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988.Google Scholar
6.Jamison, D. T., Salenian, H., & Bergevin, Y. Investing in health wisely. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1995, 673–84.Google Scholar
7.Luce, B. R., & Brown, R. E.The use of technology assessment by hospitals, health maintenance organizations, and third-party payers in the United States. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1995, 11, 79–92.Google Scholar
8.Perry, S.Assessment and management of medical technology in the United States. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1987, 3, 587–96.Google Scholar
9.Tugwell, P., Sitthi-Amorn, C., & O’Connor, A., et al. Technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1995, 11, 650–62.Google Scholar
10.U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Health care technology and its assessment in eight countries. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 02 1995.Google Scholar
11.World Bank. World development report 1993: Investing in health. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar