Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-96qlp Total loading time: 0.331 Render date: 2022-12-05T23:58:44.885Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

The Demise of Peace Treaties in Interstate War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2013

Tanisha M. Fazal*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana. E-mail: tfazal@nd.edu
Get access

Abstract

The conclusion of peace treaties following war was a norm of international politics for millennia. Since approximately 1950, however, the rate at which interstate wars have ended with a formal peace treaty has declined dramatically. I argue that the costs of concluding peace treaties have risen with the development of the modern canon of the law of war. Using an original data set, I find that states today prefer to avoid admitting to a state of war and risk placing their leaders and soldiers at risk of punishment for any violations of the law of war.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armitage, David. 2007. The Declaration of Independence: A Global History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bass, Gary Jonathan. 2000. Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blum, Gabriella. 2012. The Fog of Victory. Lecture delivered at Harvard University Law School, Cambridge, Mass., 10 April 2012. Available at ⟨http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2012/04/19-blum-chair-lecture-the-fog-of-victory.html⟩. Accessed 17 April 2013.Google Scholar
Bryce, Trevor. 2006. The “Eternal Treaty” from the Hittite Perspective. British Museum Studies in Ancient Egypt and Sudan 6:111.Google Scholar
Burke, S.M. 1973. The Postwar Diplomacy of the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. Asian Survey 13 (11):1036–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L. 2007. Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade. International Organization 61 (4):735–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, David E. 2006. Veto Players and Civil War Duration. American Journal of Political Science 50 (4):875–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Calvin DeArmond. 1975. The United States and the Second Hague Peace Conference: American Diplomacy and International Organization, 1899–1914. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. 2009. Overlapping Institutions in Trade Policy. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram. 2001. War, Aggression and Self-Defence. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, William J. 1994. Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict. American Political Science Review 88 (1):1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, Alexander B., and Monten, Jonathan. 2013. Forced To Be Free: Why Foreign-Imposed Regime Change Rarely Leads to Democratization. International Security 37 (4):90131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W., and Sambanis, Nicholas. 2006. Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2009. The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):6570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duiker, William J. 1978. Cultures in Collision: The Boxer Rebellion. San Rafael, Calif.: Presidio Press.Google Scholar
Esthus, Raymond A. 1988. Double Eagle and Rising Sun: The Russians and Japanese at Portsmouth in 1905. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M. 2007. State Death: The Politics and Geography of Conquest, Occupation, and Annexation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M. 2012. Why States No Longer Declare War. Security Studies 21 (4):557–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M., Fortna, Virginia Page, Stanton, Jessica, and Weisiger, Alex. 2006. The Interstate War Initiation and Termination (WIT) Dataset, 1816–2000. Paper presented at the 112th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortna, Virginia Page. 2004. Peace Time: Cease-Fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fortna, Virginia Page. 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents' Choices After Civil War. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fortna, Virginia Page. 2009. Where Have All the Victories Gone? Peacekeeping and War Outcomes. Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence. 2005. The Official History of the Falklands Campaign. 2 vols. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, and Gamba-Stonehouse, Virginia. 1991. Signals of War: The Falklands Conflict of 1982. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, Bryan, ed. 2004. Black's Law Dictionary. 8th ed. St. Paul, Minn.: Thomson West.Google Scholar
Goemans, Hein E. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Diehl, Paul F.. 1992. The Empirical Importance of Enduring Rivalries. International Interactions 18 (2):151–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, and Krasner, Stephen D.. 2003. The Limits of Idealism. Daedalus 132 (1):4763.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua A. 2011. Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Martin, Lisa L.. 2000. Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note. International Organization 54 (3):603–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewe, Wilhelm G. 1997. Peace Treaties. In Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 8, edited by Bernhardt, Rudolf, 938–46. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Grob, Fritz. 1949. The Relativity of War and Peace: A Study in Law, History and Politics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Human Security Report Project. 2012. Sexual Violence, Education, and War: Beyond the Mainstream Narrative. Vancouver, B.C.: Human Security Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2007. Breaking and Making Norms: American Revisionism and Crises of Legitimacy. International Politics 44:194213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iklé, Fred Charles. 2005. Every War Must End. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
International Law Association (ILA). 2010. Final Report on the Meaning of Armed Conflict in International Law. The Hague, The Netherlands: ILA.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, and Thomson, Catarina. 2013. Legitimacy and Compliance with International Law: Access to Detainees in Civil Conflicts, 1991–2006. British Journal of Political Science available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000749.Google Scholar
Kecskemeti, Paul. 1964. Strategic Surrender: The Politics of Victory and Defeat. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Korman, Sharon. 1996. The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S., and Thompson, William R.. 2011. The Arc of War: Origins, Escalation, and Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, Nigel, Hashimoto, Barry, and Reiter, Dan. 2008. Ensuring Peace: Foreign-Imposed Regime Change and Postwar Peace Duration, 1914–2001. International Organization 62 (4):717–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2011. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010. Dataset Users' Manual. Center for Systemic Peace. College Park: University of Maryland. Available at ⟨http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2010.pdf⟩. Accessed 17 April 2013.Google Scholar
Mattes, Michaela. 2008. The Effect of Changing Conditions and Agreement Provisions on Conflict and Renegotiation Between States with Competing Claims. International Studies Quarterly 52 (2):315–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Ryder. 2009. Norm Regress: U.S. Revisionism and the Slow Death of the Torture Norm. International Relations 23 (1):525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D. 2007. When Do States Follow the Laws of War? American Political Science Review 101 (3):559–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D., and Jo, Hyeran. 2006. Compliance with the Laws of War: Dataset and Coding Rules. Conflict Management and Peace Science 23 (1):91113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, John E. 1989. Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mueller, John E. 2004. The Remnants of War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen. 2004. Peace and Prosperity: Commercial Aspects of Peacemaking. In Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One, edited by Lesaffer, Randall, 365–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panke, Diana, and Petersohn, Ulrich. 2012. Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes. European Journal of International Relations 18 (4):719–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillar, Paul R. 1983. Negotiating Peace: War Termination as a Bargaining Process. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M. 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pyke, Harold Reason. 1915. The Law of Contraband of War. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rahman, H. 1997. The Making of the Gulf War: Origins of Kuwait's Long-Standing Territorial Dispute with Iraq. Reading, UK: Ithaca Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan. 2009. How Wars End. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rozman, Gilbert, ed. 2000. Japan and Russia: The Tortuous Path to Normalization, 1949–1999. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1995. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. 2nd ed. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne. 2007. Prohibiting Plunder: How Norms Change. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne. 2010. Plunder, Restitution, and International Law. International Journal of Cultural Property 17 (2):147–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne, and Stiles, Kendall W.. 2009. International Norms and Cycles of Change. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarkees, Meredith Reid, and Wayman, Frank Whelon. 2010. Resort to War: 1816–2007. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Ian. 2002. Sir Ian Sinclair: Legal Adviser to the FCO, 1976–84. In Memories of the Falklands, edited by Dale, Iain, 124–26. London: Politico's Publishing.Google Scholar
Sitaraman, Ganesh. 2009. Counterinsurgency, the War on Terror, and the Laws of War. Virginia Law Review 95 (7):1745–839.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Vanberg, Georg. 2008. The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions. American Journal of Political Science 52 (3):504–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiger, Heinhard. 2004. Peace Treaties from Paris to Versailles. In Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One, edited by Lesaffer, Randall, 59100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. 2007. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Ward. 2001. The Ethics of Destruction: Norms and Force in International Relations. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Thucydides. 1954 [431 BC]. History of the Peloponnesian War. Translated by Warner, Rex. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2003. Peace Through Victory? Paper presented at 99th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2010. Ending Civil Wars: A Case for Rebel Victory? International Security 34 (4):736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of State and Department of Defense. 2011. United States Activities in Libya. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of State and Department of Defense. Available at ⟨http://www.fas.org/man/eprint/wh-libya.pdf⟩. Accessed 17 April 2013.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollrath, Hanna. 2004. The Kiss of Peace. In Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One, edited by Lesaffer, Randall, 162–83. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Geoffrey. 2012. Regulating Conflict: Historical Legacies and State Commitment to the Laws of War. Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (2):151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2001. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Suzanne, and Yuen, Amy. 2005. Making and Keeping Peace. International Organization 59 (2):261–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacher, Mark W. 2001. The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force. International Organization 55 (2):215–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Karl-Heinz. 2004. The Influence of Medieval Roman Law on Peace Treaties. In Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One, edited by Lesaffer, Randall, 146–61. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fazal supplementary material

Fazal supplementary material

Download Fazal supplementary material(File)
File 147 KB
16
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Demise of Peace Treaties in Interstate War
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Demise of Peace Treaties in Interstate War
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Demise of Peace Treaties in Interstate War
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *