Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-598jt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-04-02T06:46:40.403Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true
  • English

Elections, Special Interests, and Financial Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

Philip Keefer
Philip Keefer
Affiliation:
Development Research Group at the World Bank, pkeefer@worldbank.org
Get access

Abstract

A large literature concludes that democracy has ambiguous effects on public policy and that political checks and balances exacerbate crisis. The analysis in this article finds that although democracies are no less likely to experience banking crises, in the event of financial crisis, competitively elected governments intervene more rapidly in insolvent banks and make transfers to them that are between 10 and 20 percent of gross domestic product less than those made by nondemocratic governments. Their countries suffer far smaller growth collapses. However, political checks and balances have no effect on government responses to financial crisis. A simple model offers new explanations for these regime effects. First, for those public policies for which voter information and political credibility are particularly likely to be problematic (financial regulation), electoral accountability matters only when the consequences of failure become large and visible (financial crisis). Second, checks and balances reduce political incentives to seek rents, offsetting the delays they induce in crisis response. The analysis in this article underlines the importance of considering regime effects on political incentives to cater to special interests at the expense of broad social interests, and of avoiding aggregated and subjective measures of democracy that can obscure the identification of regime effects.This article benefited from the generous comments of George Clarke, Robert Cull, and Patrick Honohan, and from those of participants at the 6th International Conference on Finance and Development, Moscow 2005; and in seminars at the University of California, Los Angeles, Universität Basel, and the Inter-American Development Bank.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , July 2007 , pp. 607 - 641
Copyright
© 2007 The IO Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2001. Inefficient Redistribution. American Political Science Review 95 (3):649–61.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2002. Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4):1231–94.Google Scholar
Adserà, Alícia, Carles Boix, and Mark Payne. 2003. Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 19 (2):445–90.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Allan Drazen. 1991. Why Are Stabilizations Delayed? American Economic Review 82 (5):1170–88.Google Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh. 2001. New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15 (1):165–76.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Stephen Coate. 2001. Lobbying and Welfare in a Representative Democracy. Review of Economic Studies 68 (1):67–82.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Calomiris, Charles W., and Eugene N. White. 1994. The Origins of Federal Deposit Insurance. In The Regulated Economy: A Historical Approach to Political Economy, edited by Claudia Golden and Gary D. Libecap, 145–88. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Caprio, Gerard, and Daniela Klingebiel. 1997. Bank Insolvency: Bad Luck, Bad Policy, or Bad Banking? In Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1996, edited by Michael Bruno and Boris Pleskovic, 79–104. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Dewatripont, Mathias, and Jean Tirole. 1994. The Prudential Regulation of Banks. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Feijen, Erik, and Enrico C. Perotti. 2005. The Political Economy of Financial Fragility. CEPR Discussion Paper 5317. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Center for Economic Policy Research, University of Amsterdam.
Ferejohn, John. 1986. Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice 50 (2):5–25.Google Scholar
Frederiksson, Per G., and Jakob Svensson. 2003. Political Instability, Corruption and Policy Formation: The Case of Environmental Policy. Journal of Public Economics 87 (7–8):1383–405.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 1991. Debt, Development and Democracy: Modern Political Economy and Latin America, 1965–1985. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Grindle, Merilee Serrill. 2000. Audacious Reforms: Institutional Invention and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 1996. Electoral Competition and Special Interest Politics. Review of Economic Studies 63 (2):265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 2000. The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Hicken, Allen, Shanker Satyanath, and Ernest Sergenti. 2005. Political Institutions and Economic Performance: The Effects of Accountability and Obstacles to Policy Change. American Journal of Political Science 49 (4):897–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honohan, Patrick, and Daniela Klingebiel. 2003. The Fiscal Cost Implications of an Accommodating Approach to Banking Crises. Journal of Banking and Finance 27 (8):1539–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchcroft, Paul D. 1998. Booty Capitalism: The Politics of Banking in the Philippines. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Keefer, Philip. Forthcoming. Clientelism, Credibility and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies. American Journal of Political Science.
Keefer, Philip, and Stuti Khemani. 2005. Democracy, Public Expenditures, and the Poor: Understanding Political Incentives for Providing Public Services. World Bank Research Observer 20 (1):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Razvan Vlaicu. 2005. Democracy, Credibility and Clientelism. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 3472. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Lizzeri, Alessandro, and Nicola Persico. 2001. The Provision of Public Goods Under Alternative Electoral Incentives. American Economic Review 91 (1):225–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Andrew J. 2003. The Power of Institutions: Political Architecture and Governance. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Montinola, Gabriella R. 2003. Who Recovers First? Banking Crises Resolution in Developing Countries. Comparative Political Studies 36 (5):541–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, Casey B., Ricard Gil, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2004. Do Democracies Have Different Public Policies than Non-Democracies? Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (1):51–74.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Public Policy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Powell, G. Bingham, Jr., and Guy D. Whitten. 1993. A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2):391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmusen, Eric, and J. Mark Ramseyer. 1994. Cheap Bribes and the Corruption Ban: A Coordination Game Among Rational Legislators. Public Choice 78 (3–4):305–27.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1991. The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s. American Political Science Review 85 (3):777–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1999. Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks, Social Conflict, and Growth Collapses. Journal of Economic Growth 4 (4):385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Thomas, and Barry R. Weingast. 1991. The Political Foundations of the Thrift Debacle. In Politics and Economics in the Eighties, edited by Alberto Alesina and Geoffrey Carliner, 175–209. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosas, Guillermo. 2002. Bagehot or Bailout? The Political Economy of Bank Crises, 1975–2000. Ph.D. diss., Duke University, Durham, N.C.
Rosenbluth, Frances, and Ross Schaap. 2003. The Domestic Politics of Banking Regulation. International Organization 57 (2):307–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2004. Democracy and the Supply of Transparency. Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Satyanath, Shanker. 2006. Globalization, Politics, and Financial Turmoil: Asia's Banking Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsebelis, George. 1999. Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis. American Political Science Review 93 (3):591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2006. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.