Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-t4qhp Total loading time: 0.504 Render date: 2022-08-19T23:49:26.565Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

The (In)compatibility of Peace and Justice? The International Criminal Court and Civil Conflict Termination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

Get access

Abstract

Does the International Criminal Court's (ICC) pursuit of justice facilitate peace or prolong conflict? This paper addresses the “peace versus justice” debate by examining the ICC's impact on civil conflict termination. Active ICC involvement in a conflict increases the threat of punishment for rebel and state leaders, which, under certain conditions, generates incentives for these leaders to continue the conflict as a way to avoid capture, transfer to the Hague, and prosecution. The impact of ICC involvement is conditional upon the threat of domestic punishment that leaders face; as the risk of domestic punishment increases, the conflict-prolonging effects of ICC involvement diminish. I test these theoretical expectations on a data set of all civil conflict dyads from 2002 to 2013. Findings support the hypothesized relationship. Even after addressing potential selection and endogeneity concerns, I find that active involvement by the ICC significantly decreases the likelihood of conflict termination when the threat of domestic punishment is relatively low.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ai, Chunrong, and Norton, Edward C.. 2003. Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models. Economics Letters 80 (1):123–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhavan, Payam. 2001. Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities? The American Journal of International Law 95 (1):731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1996. Human Rights in Peace Negotiations. Human Rights Quarterly 18 (2):249–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Benjamin J. 2016. In the Shadow of the International Criminal Court: Can the ICC Deter Human Rights Violations? Journal of Conflict Resolution. Published electronically 25 April. doi:10.1177/0022002716639101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Benjamin J., and Prorok, Alyssa K.. 2014. Does the ICC Have an Africa Problem? Understanding the Determinants of ICC Involvement. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Arsanjani, Mahnoush H. 1999. The International Criminal Court and National Amnesty Laws. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 93:6568.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael, Strezhnev, Anton, and Voeten, Erik. 2015. Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from UN Voting Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (2):430–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch-Lindsay, Dylan, Enterline, Andrew J., and Joyce, Kyle A.. 2008. Third-Party Intervention and the Civil War Process. Journal of Peace Research 45 (3):345–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Christopher F. 2006. An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Kyle, and Schmidt, Holger. 2012. Following the Flag or Following the Charter? Examining the Determinants of UN Involvement in International Crises, 1945–2002. International Studies Quarterly 56 (1):3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, David. 2014. Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court in a World of Power Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bosco, David, and Rudolph, Christopher. 2013. Principles and Pragmatism: Explaining Why the ICC Investigates Some Cases but Not Others. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Broache, Michael. 2014. The International Criminal Court and Atrocities in DRC: A Case Study of the RCD-Goma (Nkunda Faction)/CNDP/M23 Rebel Group. Available at <http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2434703>. Accessed 21 June 2015..+Accessed+21+June+2015.>Google Scholar
Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Smith, Alastair. 1999. Policy Failure and Political Survival: The Contribution of Political Institutions. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (2):147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhaug, Halvard, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2008. Contagion or Confusion? Why Conflicts Cluster in Space. International Studies Quarterly 52 (2):215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, David B., and Signorino, Curtis S.. 2010. Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data. Political Analysis 18 (3):271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Terrence L., and Chaudoin, Stephen. 2013. Ratification Patterns and the International Criminal Court. International Studies Quarterly 57 (2):400409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L., and Richards, David L.. 2010. The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project. Human Rights Quarterly 32 (2):401–24. doi:10.1353/hrq.0.0141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Thomas Hethe. 2005. The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Amnesties, and the “Interests of Justice”: Striking a Delicate Balance. Washington University Global Studies Law Review 4 (2):389414.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, Hoeffler, Anke, and Söderbom, Mans. 2004. On the Duration of Civil War. Journal of Peace Research 41 (3):253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croco, Sarah E. 2011. The Decider's Dilemma: Leader Culpability, War Outcomes, and Domestic Punishment. American Political Science Review 105 (3):457–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, David. 2010. Blocking Resolution: How External States Can Prolong Civil Wars. Journal of Peace Research 47 (2):115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, David, Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Salehyan, Idean. 2009. It Takes Two: A Dyadic Analysis of Civil War Duration and Outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4):570–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, David, Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Salehyan, Idean. 2013. Non-State Actors in Civil Wars: A New Dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science 30 (5):516–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Kathleen. 2011. Divide and Conquer or Divide and Concede: How Do States Respond to Internally Divided Separatists? American Political Science Review 105 (2):275–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danner, Allison Marston. 2003. Enhancing the Legitimacy and Accountability of Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court. The American Journal of International Law 97 (3):510–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deephouse, David L., and Suchman, Mark. 2008. Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Greenwood, Royston, Oliver, Christine, Suddaby, Roy, and Sahlin-Andersson, Kerstin, 4977. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2009. The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case. International Organization 63 (1):3365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRouen, Karl, and Sobek, David. 2004. The Dynamics of Civil War Duration and Outcome. Journal of Peace Research 41 (3):303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doob, Anthony N., and Webster, Cheryl Marie. 2003. Sentence Severity and Crime: Accepting the Null Hypothesis. Crime and Justice 30:143–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., and Rocke, David M.. 1994. Conflict, Agency, and Gambling for Resurrection: The Principal-Agent Problem Goes to War. American Journal of Political Science 38 (2):362–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drago, Francesco, Galbiati, Roberto, and Vertova, Pietro. 2009. The Deterrent Effects of Prison: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Journal of Political Economy 117 (2):257–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, Kristine, and Hultman, Lisa. 2007. One-Sided Violence Against Civilians in War: Insights from New Fatality Data. Journal of Peace Research 44 (2):233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2004. Why Do Some Civil Wars Last so Much Longer than Others? Journal of Peace Research 41 (3):275301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehl, Caroline. 2004. Explaining the International Criminal Court: A “Practice Test” for Rationalist and Constructivist Approaches. European Journal of International Relations 10 (3):357–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fein, Helen. 1995. More Murder in the Middle: Life-Integrity Violations and Democracy in the World, 1987. Human Rights Quarterly 17 (1):170–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Michael J. 2006. Is Enforcement Necessary for Effectiveness? A Model of the International Criminal Regime. International Organization 60 (4):935–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, H.E. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, H.E. 2008. Which Way Out? The Manner and Consequences of Losing Office. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (6):771–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack. 2003. The Self-Defeating International Criminal Court. The University of Chicago Law Review 70 (1):89104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, and Krasner, Stephen D.. 2003. The Limits of Idealism. Daedalus 132 (1):4763.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Richard. 1995. Justice as a Tool for Peace-Making: Truth Commissions and International Criminal Tribunals. NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 28 (3):485504.Google Scholar
Goodliffe, Jay, and Hawkins, Darren. 2009. A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Rome: Explaining International Criminal Court Negotiations. Journal of Politics 71 (3):977–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurses, Mehmet. 2015. Transnational Ethnic Kin and Civil War Outcomes. Political Research Quarterly 68 (1):142–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanmer, Michael J., and Kalkan, Kerem Ozan. 2013. Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models. American Journal of Political Science 57 (1):263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2012. Trying the Perpetrators and Fueling the War: The (Perverse) Effects of the International Criminal Court? Paper presented at the APSA 2012 Annual Meeting, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Howe, Edmund S., and Loftus, Thomas C.. 1996. Integration of Certainty, Severity, and Celerity Information in Judged Deterrence Value: Further Evidence and Methodological Equivalence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26 (3):226–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Criminal Court. Office of the Prosecutor. 2003. Paper on Some Policy Issues before the Office of the Prosecutor. <http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/1FA7C4C6-DE5F-42B7-8B25-60AA962ED8B6/143594/030905_Policy_Paper.pdf>. Accessed 21 January 2014..+Accessed+21+January+2014.>Google Scholar
Jalloh, Charles Chernor. 2009. Regionalizing International Criminal Law? International Criminal Law Review 9 (3):445–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, and Simmons, Beth A.. 2014. Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity? SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2552820. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. <http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2552820>. Accessed 21 June 2015..+Accessed+21+June+2015.>Google Scholar
Keller, Linda. 2007. Achieving Peace with Justice: The International Criminal Court and Ugandan Alternative Justice Mechanisms. Connecticut Journal of International Law 23 (2):209–81.Google Scholar
Kleiman, Mark. 2009. When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ku, Julian, and Nzelibe, Jide. 2006. Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities? Washington University Law Review 84 (4):777833.Google Scholar
Levitt, Steven D. 1998. Why Do Increased Arrest Rates Appear to Reduce Crime: Deterrence, Incapacitation, or Measurement Error? Economic Inquiry 36 (3):353–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majzub, Diba. 2002. Peace or Justice? Amnesties and the International Criminal Court. Melbourne Journal of International Law 3 (2):247–79.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2010. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010. University of Maryland. Available at <http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html>. Accessed 21 June 2013..+Accessed+21+June+2013.>Google Scholar
Meernik, James, Nichols, Angela, and King, Kimi L.. 2010. The Impact of International Tribunals and Domestic Trials on Peace and Human Rights After Civil War. International Studies Perspectives 11 (4):309–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meernik, James, and Shairick, Jamie. 2011. Promoting International Humanitarian Law: Strong States and the Ratification of the ICC Treaty. International Area Studies Review 14 (2):2348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S. 1998. Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century. Crime and Justice 23:142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalepa, Monika. 2010. Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalepa, Monika, and Powell, Emilia Justyna. 2016. The Role of Domestic Opposition and International Justice Regimes in Peaceful Transitions of Power. Journal of Conflict Resolution 60 (7):11911218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, Desirée. 2010. Turning Weakness into Strength: Military Capabilities, Multiple Rebel Groups and Negotiated Settlements. Conflict Management and Peace Science 27 (3):253–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paternoster, Raymond. 1987. The Deterrent Effect of the Perceived Certainty and Severity of Punishment: A Review of the Evidence and Issues. Justice Quarterly 4 (2):173217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Emilia Justyna, and Staton, Jeffrey K.. 2009. Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation. International Studies Quarterly 53 (1):149–74. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.01527.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Jonathan. 2012. Determinants of the Attempting and Outcome of Coups d’état. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (6):1017–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prorok, Alyssa K. 2016. Leader Incentives and Civil War Outcomes. American Journal of Political Science 60 (1):7084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Darryl. 2003. Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court. European Journal of International Law 14 (3):481505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William. 2008. Prosecutorial Discretion v. Judicial Activism at the International Criminal Court. Journal of International Criminal Justice 6 (4):731–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William. 2011. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. 4th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharf, Michael. 1999. The Amnesty Exception to the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. Cornell International Law Journal 32 (3):507–27.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Danner, Allison. 2010. Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court. International Organization 64 (2):225–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souare, Issaka K. 2009. The International Criminal Court and African Conflicts: The Case of Uganda. Review of African Political Economy 36 (121):369–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahn, Carsten. 2009. Judicial Review of Prosecutorial Discretion: Five Years On. In The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, edited by Stahn, Carsten and Sluiter, Goran, 247–79. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Staiger, Douglas O., and Stock, James H.. 1997. Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments. Econometrica 65 (3):557–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, James H., and Yogo, Motohiro. 2005. Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression. In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, edited by Andrews, Donald, and Stock, James, 80108. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Themnér, Lotta, and Wallensteen, Peter. 2014. Armed Conflicts, 1946–2013. Journal of Peace Research 51 (4):541–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thyne, Clayton L. 2012. Information, Commitment, and Intra-War Bargaining: The Effect of Governmental Constraints on Civil War Duration. International Studies Quarterly 56 (2):307–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa-Vicencio, Charles. 2000. Why Perpetrators Should Not Always Be Prosecuted: Where the International Criminal Court and Truth Commissions Meet. Emory Law Journal 49 (1):205–22.Google Scholar
Wippman, David. 1999. Atrocities, Deterrence, and the Limits of International Justice. Fordham International Law Journal 23 (2):473–88.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Prorok supplementary material

Prorok supplementary material

Download Prorok supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1 MB
17
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The (In)compatibility of Peace and Justice? The International Criminal Court and Civil Conflict Termination
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The (In)compatibility of Peace and Justice? The International Criminal Court and Civil Conflict Termination
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The (In)compatibility of Peace and Justice? The International Criminal Court and Civil Conflict Termination
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *