Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Who's There? Election Observer Identity and the Local Credibility of Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2018

Get access

Abstract

Prior research has sought to understand the rise of election observers and their consequences for outcomes such as fraud, protest, and violence. These studies are important but they overlook a significant individual-level dynamic that observers themselves care about: the effect that election observers have on local attitudes about elections. We argue that the activities of election observers can enhance elections' local credibility, but only when locals perceive observers as being both capable of detecting fraud and unbiased in that pursuit. Not all observer groups are seen as equally capable and unbiased. Evidence from a large-scale, nationally representative experiment in Tunisia supports the argument. A key finding is that observers from the Arab League—an organization criticized internationally for low-quality election observation—enhanced credibility the most because they were perceived locally as both relatively capable and unbiased.


Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Abbott, Kenneth W. 1993. Trust but Verify: The Production of Information in Arms Control Treaties and Other International Agreements. Cornell International Law Journal 26 (1):158.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher, Blais, André, Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Listhaug, Ola. 2005. Losers' Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autesserre, Séverine. 2014. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Solingen, Etel. 2007. Designed to Fail or Failure of Design? The Origins and Legacy of the Arab League. In Crafting Cooperation: The Design and Effect of Regional Institutions in Comparative Perspective, edited by Johnston, Alistair Iain and Achyara, Amitav, 180220. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, Emily. 2014. Electoral Protest and Democracy in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, Emily, and Hyde, Susan D.. 2009. In the Shadow of Democracy Promotion: Strategic Manipulation, International Observers, and Election Boycotts. Comparative Political Studies 42 (3):392415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beber, Bernd, Gilligan, Michael J., Guardado, Jenny, and Karim, Sabrina. 2017. Peacekeeping, International Norms, and Transactional Sex in Monrovia, Liberia. International Organization 71 (1):130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2008. Electoral Institutions and Popular Confidence in Electoral Processes: A Cross-National Analysis. Electoral Studies 27 (2):305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2010. Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout. Comparative Political Studies 43 (12):1601–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boubakri, Amor. 2012. The League of Arab States and the Electoral Gap. In The Integrity of Elections: The Role of Regional Organizations, edited by Cordenillo, Raul and Ellis, Andrew, 7792. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Bove, Vincenzo, and Ruggeri, Andrea. 2016. Kinds of Blue: Diversity in UN Peacekeeping Missions and Civilian Protection. British Journal of Political Science 46 (3):681700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2014. Building Confidence in Elections: The Case of Electoral Monitors in Kosova. Journal of Experimental Political Science 1 (1):615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosig, Malte. 2013. Introduction: The African Security Regime Complex—Exploring Converging Actors and Policies. African Security 6 (3–4):171–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2015. The Taming of Democracy Assistance: Why Democracy Promotion Does Not Confront Dictators. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2016. When and Why Is Civil Society Support “Made-in-America”? Delegation to Non-State Actors in American Democracy Promotion. Review of International Organizations 11 (3):361–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn, and Prather, Lauren. 2017. The Promise and Limits of Election Observers in Building Election Credibility. Journal of Politics 79 (3):921935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantú, Francisco, and García-Ponce, Omar. 2015. Partisan Losers’ Effects: Perceptions of Electoral Integrity in Mexico. Electoral Studies 39:114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1997. The Observers Observed. Journal of Democracy 8 (3):1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloward, Karisa. 2014. False Commitments: Local Misrepresentation and the International Norms Against Female Genital Mutilation and Early Marriage. International Organization 68 (3):495526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corstange, Daniel, and Marinov, Nikolay. 2012. Taking Sides in Other People's Elections: The Polarizing Effect of Foreign Intervention. American Journal of Political Science 56 (3):655–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daxecker, Ursula E. 2012. The Cost of Exposing Cheating: International Election Monitoring, Fraud, and Post-Election Violence in Africa. Journal of Peace Research 49 (4):503–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daxecker, Ursula, and Steiner, Gerald. 2014. Election Monitoring: The Implications of Multiple Monitors for Electoral Integrity. In Advancing Electoral Integrity, edited by Norris, Pippa, Frank, Richard W., and Martínez i Coma, Ferran, 7393. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellmuth, Lisa Marie, and Tallberg, Jonas. 2015. The Social Legitimacy of International Organisations: Interest Representation, Institutional Performance, and Confidence Extrapolation in the United Nations. Review of International Studies 41 (3):451–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donno, Daniela. 2010. Who Is Punished? Regional Intergovernmental Organizations and the Enforcement of Democratic Norms. International Organization 64 (4):593625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortna, Virginia Paige. 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerent's Choices After Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Freyburg, Tina, and Richter, Solveig. 2015. Local Actors in the Driver's Seat: TransAtlantic Democracy Promotion Under Regime Competition in the Arab World. Democratization 22 (3):496518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Grant M., and Young, Lauren E.. 2017. Cooperation, Information, and Keeping the Peace: Civilian Engagement with Peacekeepers in Haiti. Journal of Peace Research 54 (1):6479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Jessica F. 2013. Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2009. The Power Politics of Regime Complexity: Human Rights Trade Conditionality in Europe. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):3337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hyde, Susan D., and Jablonski, Ryan S.. 2014. When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence? British Journal of Political Science 44 (1):149–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Ron, James. 2013. The Latin Bias: Regions, the Anglo-American Media, and Human Rights. International Studies Quarterly 57 (3):474–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2007. The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. World Politics 60 (1):3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2011. The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2012. Why Believe International Election Monitors? In The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue Is Not Enough, edited by Gourevitch, Peter A., Lake, David A., and Stein, Janice Gross, 3761. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, Susan D., and Marinov, Nikolay. 2014. Information and Self-Enforcing Democracy: The Role of International Election Observation. International Organization 68 (2):329–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin, and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2011. Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies. American Political Science Review 105 (4):765–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamal, Amaney A. 2012. Of Empires and Citizens: Pro-American Democracy or No Democracy at All? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Tana. 2011. Guilt by Association: The Link Between States’ Influence and Legitimacy of Inter-governmental Organizations. Review of International Organizations 6 (1):5784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2007. Varieties of Anti-Americanism: A Framework for Analysis. In Anti-Americanisms in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Keohane, Robert O., 938. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2009. D-Minus Elections: The Politics and Norms of International Election Observation. International Organization 63 (4):765–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2011. Do International Election Monitors Increase or Decrease Opposition Boycotts? Comparative Political Studies 44 (11):1527–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2012. Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works and Why It Often Fails. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Victor, David G.. 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1):723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Nicholas. 2013. Popular Evaluations of Election Quality in Africa: Evidence from Nigeria. Electoral Studies 32 (4):819–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthua, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marinov, Nikolay. 2013. Voter Attitudes when Democracy Promotion Turns Partisan: Evidence from a Survey-Experiment in Lebanon. Democratization 20 (7):1297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matanock, Aila M. 2017. Bullets for Ballots: Electoral Participation Provisions and Enduring Peace After Civil Conflict. International Security 41 (4):93132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merloe, Patrick. 2015. Election Monitoring Vs. Disinformation. Journal of Democracy 26 (3):7993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moaddel, Mansoor. 2015. A Panel Survey of Value Orientations and Political Actions in Tunisia, 2013–2015. Unpublished Data set. College Park, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Nooruddin, Irfan, and Sokhey, Sarah Wilson. 2012. Credible Certification of Child Labor Free Production. In The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue is Not Enough, edited by Gourevitch, Peter A., Lake, David A., and Stein, Janice Gross, 6285. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2013a. Does the World Agree About Standards of Electoral Integrity? Evidence for the Diffusion of Global Norms. Electoral Studies 32 (4):576–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2013b. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, Frank, Richard W., and Martínez i Coma, Ferran. 2015. Contentious Elections: From Votes to Violence. In Contentious Elections: From Ballots to Barricades, edited by Norris, Pippa, Frank, Richard W., and Martínez i Coma, Ferran, 121. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Petrova, Tsveta. 2014. From Solidarity to Geopolitics: Support for Democracy among Postcommunist States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Graeme. 2017. Political Orientation, Information and Perceptions of Election Fraud: Evidence from Russia. British Journal of Political Science 47 (3):589608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo. 2010. Trust in Elections and the Institutional Design of Electoral Authorities: Evidence from Latin America. Electoral Studies 29 (1):7490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savun, Burcu, and Tirone, Daniel C.. 2011. Foreign Aid, Democratization, and Civil Conflict: How Does Democracy Aid Affect Civil Conflict? American Journal of Political Science 55 (2):233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpser, Alberto. 2013. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpser, Alberto, and Donno, Daniela. 2012. Can International Election Monitoring Harm Governance? Journal of Politics 74 (2):501–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroup, Sarah S. 2012. Borders Among Activists: International NGOs in the United States, Britain, and France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2002. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bush and Prather supplementary material

Bush and Prather supplementary material 1

[Opens in a new window]
File 4 KB

Bush and Prather supplementary material

Bush and Prather supplementary material 2

[Opens in a new window]
File 82 KB

Altmetric attention score


Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 49
Total number of PDF views: 712 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th May 2018 - 4th December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-b4dcdd7-fbgh5 Total loading time: 0.402 Render date: 2020-12-04T15:46:03.733Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Fri Dec 04 2020 15:00:06 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Who's There? Election Observer Identity and the Local Credibility of Elections
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Who's There? Election Observer Identity and the Local Credibility of Elections
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Who's There? Election Observer Identity and the Local Credibility of Elections
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *