Skip to main content
×
Home

Courts Without Borders: Domestic Sources of U.S. Extraterritoriality in the Regulatory Sphere

  • Tonya L. Putnam (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Regulating private transactions across international boundaries has long posed a challenge to states. Extraterritoriality—the direct regulation of persons and conduct outside a state's borders—is an increasingly common mechanism by which strong states attempt to manage problems associated with transnational activities. This article seeks to account for variation across issues in the willingness of U.S. courts to regulate extraterritorially by focusing on the potential for external conduct to undermine domestic legal rules. It suggests further how attention to domestic-level regulatory processes, with particular focus on the role of private actors, can shed new light on transnational rulemaking and enforcement.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abbott Kenneth W., and Snidal Duncan. 2002. Values and Interests: International Legalization in the Fight Against Corruption. Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1):S141–78.
American Law Institute. 1987. Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States. St. Paul, Minn.: American Law Institute.
Bailey Michael, Goldstein Judith, and Weingast Barry R.. 1997. The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade. World Politics 49 (3):309–38.
Baron David P. 2001. Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 10 (1):745.
Baum Lawrence. 1994. What Judges Want: Judges' Goals and Judicial Behavior. Political Research Quarterly 47: 749758.
Baum Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Borchers Patrick J. 1998. Judgments Conventions and Minimum Contacts. Albany Law Review 61 (4):1161–76.
Borchers Patrick J. 2001. The Problem with General Jurisdiction. University of Chicago Legal Forum 2001: 119–36.
Born Gary B. 1992. A Reappraisal of the Extraterritorial Reach of U.S. Law. Law & Policy in International Business 24 (3):1100.
Born Gary B. 1996. International Civil Litigation in United States Courts: Commentary & Materials. 3d ed.Boston, Mass.: Kluwer Law International.
Bradley Curtis A. 2000. ‘Chevron’ Deference and Foreign Affairs. Virginia Law Review 86:649726.
Charney Jonathan I. 1989. Judicial Deference in International Relations. American Journal of International Law 83 (4):805–13.
Clark Harry L. 1999. Dealing with U.S. Extraterritorial Sanctions and Foreign Countermeasures. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Economic Law 20:6188.
Coyle Anne. 2004. A Modest Reform: The New Rule 32.1 Permitting Citation to Unpublished Opinions in the Federal Court of Appeals. Fordham Law Review 72: 2471–501.
Cross Frank B., and Nelson Blake J.. 2001. Strategic Institutional Effects on Supreme Court Decision Making. Northwestern University Law Review 95 (3):1437–94.
Cutler A. Claire, Haufler Virginia, and Porter Tony. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Drezner Daniel W. 2001. Globalization and Policy Convergence. International Studies Review 3 (1):5378.
Drezner Daniel W. 2007. All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Falk Richard A. 1964. The Role of Domestic Courts in the International Legal Order. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.
Ferejohn John A., and Kramer Larry D.. 2002. Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Institutionalizing Judicial Restraint. New York University Law Review 77 (4):9621039.
Ferejohn John A., and Weingast Barry R.. 1992a. A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation. International Review of Law and Economics 12 (2):263–79.
Ferejohn John A., and Weingast Barry R.. 1992b. Limitation of Statutes: Strategic Statutory Interpretation. The Georgetown Law Journal 80 (3):565–82.
Frieden Jeffry. 2006. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century. New York: Norton.
Friedman Lawrence M. 2004. American Law in the 20th Century. New York: Yale University Press.
Gerber David J. 1983. The Extraterritorial Application of the German Antitrust Laws. American Journal of International Law 77:756–83.
Glennon Michael J. 1989. Foreign Affairs and the Political Question Doctrine. American Journal of International Law 83:814–21.
Goldsmith Jack. 1998. Against Cyberanarchy. University of Chicago Law Review 65:11991250.
Griffin Joseph P. 1999. Extraterritoriality in U.S. and EU Antitrust Enforcement. Antitrust Law Journal 65 (1):159–99.
Gunther Gerald, and Sullivan Kathleen M.. 1997. Constitutional Law. 13th ed.Westbury, N.Y.: Foundation Press.
Harding Christopher, and Joshua Julian. 2003. Regulating Cartels in Europe: A Study of Legal Control of Corporate Delinquency. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Haufler Virginia. 2001. Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Jung Youngjin. 2005. Korean Competition Law: First Step Towards Globalization. Journal of Korean Law 4 (2):177200.
Keohane Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keohane Robert O. 2002. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. New York: Routledge.
King Kimi Lynn, and Meernik James. 1999. The Supreme Court and the Powers of the Executive: The Adjudication of Foreign Policy. Political Research Quarterly 52 (4):801–24.
Knill Christoph. 2005. Introduction: Cross-national Policy Convergence: Concepts, Approaches and Explanatory Factors. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5):764–74.
Kozlowski Mark. 2003. The Myth of the Imperial Judiciary: Why the Right Is Wrong About the Courts. New York: New York University Press.
Krasner Stephen D. 1991. Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics 43 (3):336–66.
Krasner Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty, Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Martin Lisa L., and Simmons Beth A.. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–57.
Mattei Ugo, and Lena Jeffrey. 2001. U.S. Jurisdiction over Conflicts Arising Outside of the United States: Some Hegemonic Implications. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 24:381400.
Mattli Walter. 2001. The Politics and Economics of International Standards Setting: An Introduction. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (3):328–44.
Mattli Walter, and Büthe Tim. 2003. Setting International Standards: Technical Rationality of Primacy of Power? World Politics 56 (1):142.
Meessen Karl M. 1996. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Theory and Practice. Boston: Kluwer Law International.
Milner Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Moravcsik Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4):513–53.
Nader Laura. 2002. The Life of the Law: Anthropological Projects. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Priest George L., and Klein Benjamin. 1984. The Selection of Disputes for Litigation. Journal of Legal Studies 13:155.
Raustiala Kal. 2006. The Evolution of Territoriality: International Relations and American Law. In Territoriality and Conflict in an Era of Globalization, edited by Kahler Miles and Walter Barbara F., 219–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Risse-Kappen Thomas. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rodman Kenneth A. 2001. Sanctions Beyond Borders: Multinational Corporations and U.S. Economic Statecraft. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Samuels Jeffrey M., and Samuels Linda B.. 2004. International Trademark Protection Streamlined: The Madrid Protocol Comes into Force in the United States. Journal of Intellectual Property Law 12 (1):151–62.
Sartori Anne E. 2003. An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions. Political Analysis 11 (2):111–38.
Segal Jeffrey A. 1988. Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General During the Burger and Warren Courts: A Research Note. The Western Political Quarterly 41 (1):135–44.
Segal Jeffrey A. 1997. Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts. American Political Science Review 91 (1):2844.
Sell Susan K. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Simmons Beth A. 1998. Compliance with International Agreements. Annual Review of Political Science 1:7593.
Simmons Beth A. 2001. The International Politics of Harmonization: The Case of Capital Market Regulation. International Organization 55 (3):589620.
Singer David Andrew. 2004. Capital Rules: The Domestic Politics of International Regulatory Harmonization. International Organization 58 (3):531–65.
Slaughter Anne-Marie. 2003. A Global Community of Courts. Harvard International Law Journal 44:191219.
Slaughter Anne-Marie. 2004. Sovereignty and Power in a Networked World Order. Stanford Journal of International Law 40:283327.
Sykes Alan O. 1999. The (Limited) Role of Regulatory Harmonization in International Markets for Goods and Services. Journal of International Economic Law 2 (1):4970.
Tamura Jiro, Gidley J. Mark, and Jasinski Douglas M.. 2005. Japan Cartels. Global Competition Review, April. Available at ⟨http://www.whitecase.com/publications/List.aspx?AdvancedServices=6224f06d-6f34-47bb-921e-50c4922a277f&year=2005⟩. Accessed 19 January 2009.
Tomz Michael, Wittenberg Jason, and King Gary. 2000. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Available at ⟨http://gking.harvard.edu/clarify/docs/clarify.html⟩. Accessed 27 March 2009.
Turley Jonathan. 1990. ‘When in Rome’: Multinational Misconduct and the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality. Northwestern University Law Review 84:598664.
Vogel David. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 50 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 201 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.