Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention

  • Séverine Autesserre (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Why do international peacebuilders fail to address the local causes of peace process failures? The existing explanations of peacebuilding failures, which focus on constraints and vested interests, do not explain the international neglect of local conflict. In this article, I show how discursive frames shape international intervention and preclude international action on local violence. Drawing on more than 330 interviews, multi-sited ethnography, and document analysis, I develop a case study of the Democratic Republic of Congo's transition from war to peace and democracy (2003–2006). I demonstrate that local agendas played a decisive role in sustaining local, national, and regional violence. However, a postconflict peacebuilding frame shaped the international understanding of violence and intervention in such a way that local conflict resolution appeared irrelevant and illegitimate. This frame included four key elements: international actors labeled the Congo a “postconflict” situation; they believed that violence there was innate and therefore acceptable even in peacetime; they conceptualized international intervention as exclusively concerned with the national and international realms; and they saw holding elections, as opposed to local conflict resolution, as a workable, appropriate, and effective tool for state- and peacebuilding. This frame authorized and justified specific practices and policies while precluding others, notably local conflict resolution, ultimately dooming the peacebuilding efforts. In conclusion, I contend that analyzing discursive frames is a fruitful approach to the puzzle of international peacebuilding failures beyond the Congo.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Séverine Autesserre . 2007. D. R. Congo: Explaining Peace Building Failures, 2003–2006. Review of African Political Economy 34 (113):423–41.

Robert D. Benford , and David A. Snow . 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–39.

Alex de Waal . 2005. Who Are the Darfurians? Arab and African Identities, Violence and External Engagement. African Affairs 104 (415):181205.

Paul J. DiMaggio , and Walter W. Powell . 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2):147–60.

Kevin C. Dunn 2003. Imagining the Congo: The International Relations of Identity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Robert Jervis . 2006. Understanding Beliefs. Political Psychology 27 (5):641–63.

Terrence Lyons . 2004. Post-Conflict Elections and the Process of Demilitarizing Politics: The Role of Electoral Administration. Democratization 11 (3):3662.

Iver Neumann . 2008. Discourse Analysis. In Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, edited by Audie Klotz and Deepa Prakash , 6177. New York: Palgrave.

Marina Ottaway . 2002. Rebuilding State Institutions in Collapsed States. Development and Change 33 (5):1001–23.

Roland Paris . 2003. Peacekeeping and the Constraints of Global Culture. European Journal of International Relations 9 (3):441–73.

Joseph F. Porac , Howard Thomas , and Charles W. F. Baden-Fuller . 1989. Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies 26 (4):397416.

Ibrahim Seaga Shaw . 2007. Historical Frames and the Politics of Humanitarian Intervention: From Ethiopia, Somalia to Rwanda. Globalisation, Societies and Education 5 (3):351–71.

Stephen John Stedman . 1997. Spoilers Problems in Peace Processes. International Security 22 (2):553.

Richard Youngs . 2004. Democratic Institution-Building and Conflict Resolution: Emerging EU Approaches. International Peacekeeping 11 (3):526–43.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×