Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 18
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Anderson, Christopher C. Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin and Schilling, Emily U. 2016. Kantian Dynamics Revisited: Time-Varying Analyses of Dyadic IGO-Conflict Relationships. International Interactions, Vol. 42, Issue. 4, p. 644.


    GEIS, ANNA and WAGNER, WOLFGANG 2011. How far is it from Königsberg to Kandahar? Democratic peace and democratic violence in International Relations. Review of International Studies, Vol. 37, Issue. 04, p. 1555.


    Rapkin, David P. and Thompson, William R. 2009. Systemic Transitions.


    Beckfield, Jason 2008. The Dual World Polity: Fragmentation and Integration in the Network of Intergovernmental Organizations. Social Problems, Vol. 55, Issue. 3, p. 419.


    Boehmer, Charles and Nordstrom, Timothy 2008. Intergovernmental Organization Memberships: Examining Political Community and the Attributes of International Organizations. International Interactions, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 282.


    Suh, Jae-Jung 2007. Power, Interest, and Identity in Military Alliances.


    Egeberg, Morten 2005. EU Institutions and the Transformation of European-Level Politics: How to Understand Profound Change (If It Occurs). Comparative European Politics, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 102.


    Ingram, Paul Robinson, Jeffrey and Busch, Marc L. 2005. The Intergovernmental Network of World Trade: IGO Connectedness, Governance, and Embeddedness1. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 111, Issue. 3, p. 824.


    Boehmer, Charles Gartzke, Erik and Nordstrom, Timothy 2004. Do Intergovernmental Organizations Promote Peace?. World Politics, Vol. 57, Issue. 01, p. 1.


    Diehl, Paul F. Ku, Charlotte and Zamora, Daniel 2003. The Dynamics of International Law: The Interaction of Normative and Operating Systems. International Organization, Vol. 57, Issue. 01,


    Faber, J. 1991. Cooperation and conflict among nations: An application of multi-sample confirmatory factor analysis. Statistica Neerlandica, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, p. 195.


    Kemp, Anita 1978. A path analytic model of international violence. International Interactions, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 53.


    Dixon, William J. 1977. Research on research revisited: another half decade of quantitative and field research on international organizations. International Organization, Vol. 31, Issue. 01, p. 65.


    WEEDE, ERICH 1977. THREATS TO DETENTE: INTUITIVE HOPES AND COUNTERINTUITIVE REALITIES. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 5, Issue. 4, p. 407.


    Miller, James G. 1976. Living systems: The supranational system. Behavioral Science, Vol. 21, Issue. 5, p. 320.


    Small, Melvin 1976. The Applicability of Quantitative International Politics to Diplomatic History. The Historian, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 281.


    Singer, J. David 1972. The “Correlates of War” Project: Interim Report and Rationale. World Politics, Vol. 24, Issue. 02, p. 243.


    Singer, J. David 1970. Individual values, national interests, and political development in the international system. Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 6, Issue. 9, p. 197.


    ×

Intergovernmental Organization and the Preservation of Peace, 1816–1964: Some Bivariate Relationships

Abstract

In the three centuries or so since the modern international system began flo take on its present shape, its component members have come together in a wide variety of organizations, for a wide variety of purposes. Those who act on behalf of the nations have turned to international organizations to oversee peace settlements, to strengthen their collective defense capacity, to mediate conflicts between themselves, to discourage interference from the outside, to harmonize their trade relations, to supervise international waterways, to accelerate the production of food, to codify diplomatic practice, and to formalize legal proceedings. Some organizations are established primarily for the neutral purpose of making coexistence possible, others for the more affirmative purposes of positive cooperation. Some have been directed toward the modification of the system, others toward the preservation of its status quo.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

W. S. Robinson , “Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals,” American Sociological Review, 061950 (Vol. 15, No. 3), PP. 351357

J. David Singer , “Man and World Politics: The Psycho-Cultural Interface,” Journal of Social Issues, 071968 (Vol. 24, No. 3), pp. 127156

J. David Singer and Melvin Small , “The Composition and Status Ordering of the International System: 1815–1940,” World Politics, 011966 (Vol. 18, No. 2), pp. 236282

Bruce M. Russett , J. David Singer , and Melvin Small , “National Political Units in the Twentieth Century: A Standardized List,” American Political Science Review, 091968 (Vol. 62, No. 3), pp. 932951

Paul Smoker , “Nation-State Escalation and International Integration,” Journal of Peace Research, 1967 (Vol. 4), pp. 6175

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×