Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe

  • Laurence R. Helfer (a1) and Erik Voeten (a2)

Do international court judgments influence the behavior of actors other than the parties to a dispute? Are international courts agents of policy change or do their judgments merely reflect evolving social and political trends? We develop a theory that specifies the conditions under which international courts can use their interpretive discretion to have system-wide effects. We examine the theory in the context of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) rulings on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) issues by creating a new data set that matches these rulings with laws in all Council of Europe (CoE) member states. We also collect data on LGBT policies unaffected by ECtHR judgments to control for the confounding effect of evolving trends in national policies. We find that ECtHR judgments against one country substantially increase the probability of national-level policy change across Europe. The marginal effects of the judgments are especially high where public acceptance of sexual minorities is low, but where national courts can rely on ECtHR precedents to invalidate domestic laws or where the government in power is not ideologically opposed to LGBT equality. We conclude by exploring the implications of our findings for other international courts.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Amy Adamczyk , and Cassady Pitt . 2009. Shaping Attitudes About Homosexuality: The Role of Religion and Cultural Context. Social Science Research 38 (2):338–51.

Karen J. Alter , and Sophie Meunier-Aitsahalia . 1994. Judicial Politics in the European Community: European Integration and the Pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon Decision. Comparative Political Studies 26 (4):535–61.

Marc L. Busch 2007. Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade. International Organization 61 (4):735–61.

Xinyuan Dai . 2005. Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism. International Organization 59 (2):363–98.

George W. Downs , and Michael A. Jones . 2002. Reputation, Compliance, and International Law. Journal of Legal Studies 31 (S1):S95S114.

Laurence R. Helfer 2008. Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime. European Journal of International Law 19 (1):125–59.

Laurence R. Helfer , Karen J. Alter , and M. Florencia Guerzovich . 2009. Islands of Effective International Adjudication: Constructing an Intellectual Property Rule of Law in the Andean Community. American Journal of International Law 103 (1):147.

Robert L. Howse , and Ruti Teitel . 2010. Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters. Global Policy 1 (2):127–36.

Robert Inglehart , and Wayne E. Baker . 2000. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review 65 (1):1951.

Helen Keller , and Alec Stone Sweet . 2008. A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Mattias Kumm , and Ferreres Comella . 2005. The Primacy Clause of the Constitutional Treaty and the Future of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union. International Journal of Constitutional Law 3 (2-3):473–92.

David S. Lee 2008. Randomized Experiments from Non-Random Selection in US House Elections. Journal of Econometrics 142 (2):675–97.

Lisa Martin . 2012. Against Compliance. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey Dunoff and Mark Pollack , 591610. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jeffrey K. Staton , and Will H. Moore . 2011. Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics. International Organization 65 (3):533–87.

Erik Voeten . 2007. The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights. International Organization 61 (4):669701.

John R. Zaller 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 41
Total number of PDF views: 317 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1393 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

A correction has been issued for this article: