Skip to main content
×
Home

Neoliberal Economists and Capital Account Liberalization in Emerging Markets

  • Jeffrey Chwieroth (a1)
Abstract

One of the most important developments in the world economy during the past three decades has been the willingness of governments in emerging markets to liberalize controls over international capital movements—a process known as capital account liberalization. What accounts for this trend? While existing research highlights a number of important factors, it neglects the role played by the rise and spread of neoliberal ideas that prioritized liberalization as a policy choice. Extending the literature on epistemic communities, I argue one critical mechanism shaping policy decisions is the formation of a coherent team of neoliberal economists. Using a new data set that codes the professional training of more than 1500 policymakers in emerging markets, I assess the relative importance of this argument quantitatively on a sample of twenty-nine emerging markets from 1977 to 1999. In order to assess the independent effect of neoliberal economists, I also take into account the endogeneity of the appointment process, assessing whether appointments are driven by credibility concerns, political interests, or economic conditions. I also stress that a fuller understanding of the appointment process necessitates a focus on the social environment in which appointments are situated.Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Program on International Politics, Economics and Security (PIPES), University of Chicago, 28 April 2005; the 99th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, 28–31 August 2003; and the Meeting of the Working Group on Political Economy, European University Institute (EUI), San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy, 29 October 2003. The author is grateful for helpful comments on earlier drafts provided by David Andrews, Benjamin J. Cohen, Scott Cooper, Garrett Glasgow, Lloyd Gruber, Emilie Hafner-Burton, Bob Hancke, Joseph Jupille, Ralf Leiteritz, Charles Lipson, Layna Mosley, Lou Pauly, Andy Sobel, Duncan Snidal, Lora Viola, and participants in the PIPES workshop. The author would also like to thank Lisa Martin and the anonymous reviewers for their many suggestions and insightful comments on previous versions of this manuscript. Research support provided by the Department of Political Science at Syracuse University and a Jean Monnet Fellowship from the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies at the EUI is also gratefully acknowledged.

Copyright
References
Hide All

REFERENCES

Andrews, David M. 1994. Capital Mobility and State Autonomy: Toward a Structural Theory of International Monetary Relations. International Studies Quarterly 38 (2):193218.
Babb, Sarah. 2001. Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bates, Robert H., and Anne O. Krueger. 1993. Generalizations Arising from the Country Studies. In Political and Economic Interactions in Economic Policy Reform: Evidence from Eight Countries, edited by Robert H. Bates and Anne O. Krueger, 44472. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Bartolini, Leonardo, and Allan Drazen. 1997. Capital Account Liberalization as a Signal. American Economic Review 87 (1):13854.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 2004. Time-Series Cross-Section Issues: Dynamics, 2004. Unpublished manuscript, New York University. Available at 〈http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/politics/faculty/beck/beckkatz.pdf〉. Accessed 23 August 2006.
Beck, Thorsten, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh. 2001. New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15 (1):16576.
Beck, Thorsten, Asli Demirguc-Kunt, and Ross Eric Levine. 2000. A New Database of Financial Development and Structure. World Bank Economic Review 14 (3):597605.
Best, Jacqueline. 2005. The Limits of Transparency: Ambiguity and the History of International Finance. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Bradford S. Jones. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
British Bankers' Association (BBA). 2006. Historic BBA LIBOR Rates. Available at 〈http://www.bba.org.uk/bba/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=141〉. Accessed 9 May 2006.
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):55388.
Chinn, Menzie D., and Hiro Ito. 2002. Capital Account Liberalization, Institutions, and Financial Development: Cross Country Evidence. NBER Working Paper 8967. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Chwieroth, Jeffrey. 2007a. Testing and Measuring the Role of Ideas: The Case of Neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund. International Studies Quarterly 51 (1):530.
Chwieroth, Jeffrey. 2007b. A Capital Idea: Neoliberalism, the IMF, and the Liberalization of Capital Controls in Emerging Markets. Unpublished manuscript, London School of Economics, London.
Corrales, Javier. 1997. Why Argentines Followed Cavallo: A Technopol Between Democracy and Economic Reform. In Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s, edited by Jorge I. Dominguez, 4994. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Cukierman, Alex. 1992. Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
de Haan, Jakob, and Willem J. Kooi. 2000. Does Central Bank Independence Really Matter? New Evidence for Developing Countries using a New Indicator. Journal of Banking and Finance 24 (4):64364.
Diaz-Alejandro, Carlos. 1984. Latin American Debt: I Don't Think We Are in Kansas Anymore (with Discussion). Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:335403.
Dominguez, Jorge I., ed. 1997. Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Eichengreen, Barry. 2001. Capital Account Liberalization: What Do Cross-Country Studies Tell Us? World Bank Economic Review 15 (3):34165.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.
Fischer, Stanley. 1997. Applied Economics in Action: IMF Programs. American Economic Review 87 (2):2327.
Frieden, Jeffry A. 1991. Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance. International Organization 45 (4):42551.
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician's Dilemma: Reforming the State in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1):135.
Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. 1992. Institutions and Economic Adjustment. In The Politics of Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Politics, and the State, edited by Stephan Haggard and Robert Kaufman, 340. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Hall, Peter A., ed. 1989 The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Helleiner, Eric. 1994. States and the Reemergence of Global Finance: From Bretton Woods to the 1990s. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Various years. Annual Report on Exchange Restrictions and Exchange Arrangements. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2005. The IMF's Approach to Capital Account Liberalization. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2006a. Direction of Trade Statistics. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2006b. International Financial Statistics. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
Institute of International Finance (IIF). 1997. Capital Account Convertibility as an IMF Obligation: Background Paper. Unpublished memorandum, IIF, Washington, D.C.
Keefer, Philip, and David Stasavage. 2003. The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence and the Credibility of Monetary Policy. American Political Science Review 97 (3):40723.
Kirshner, Jonathan. 2003. Explaining Choices About Money: Disentangling Power, Ideas, and Conflict. In Monetary Orders: Ambiguous Economics, Ubiquitous Politics, edited by Jonathan Kirshner, 26080. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Klamer, Arjo, and David Colander. 1990. The Making of an Economist. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kristensen, Ida Pagder, and Gregory Wawro. 2006. On the Robustness of Panel Corrected Standard Errors in Dynamic Specifications with Unobserved Heterogeneity. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, New York.
Leblang, David A. 2004. Is Democracy Incompatible with International Economic Stability? In The Future of the International Monetary System, edited by Marc Uzan, 16898. London: Edward Elgar.
Markoff, John, and Veronica Montecinos. 1993. The Ubiquitous Rise of Economists. Journal of Public Policy 13 (1):3768.
Marshall, Monty G., Keith Jaggers, and Ted Robert Gurr. 2004. Polity IV Project. Available at 〈http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/polity/〉. Accessed 8 May 2006.
Maxfield, Sylvia. 1997. Gatekeepers of Growth: The International Political Economy of Central Banking in Developing Countries. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Munck, Gerardo L., and Jay Verkuilen. 2002. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy. Comparative Political Studies 35 (1):534.
Obstfeld, Maurice. 1998. The Global Capital Market: Benefactor or Menace? NBER Working Paper 6559. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Various years. International Capital Market Statistics. Paris: OECD.
Simmons, Beth A., Geoffrey Garrett, and Frank Dobbin. 2006. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization 60 (4):781810.
Simmons, Beth A., and Zachary Elkins. 2004. The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political Science Review 98 (1):17189.
Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tirole, Jean. 2002. Financial Crises, Liquidity, and the International Monetary System. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
U.S. Department of State. 2006. Bilateral Investment Treaty Program Fact Sheet. Available at 〈http://www.state.gov/error_404.html〉. Accessed 9 May 2006.
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Widmaier, Wesley W. 2003. Constructing Monetary Crises: New Keynesian Understandings of Monetary Cooperation in the 1990s. Review of International Studies 29 (1):6177.
Williamson, John. 1997. Orthodoxy is Right: Liberalize the Capital Account Last. In Capital Controls in Emerging Markets, edited by Christine Ries and Richard Sweeny, 1316. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
World Bank. 2006a. Global Development Finance. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Bank. 2006b. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 148 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 464 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.