Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Philadelphian system: sovereignty, arms control, and balance of power in the American states-union, circa 1787–1861

  • Daniel H. Deudney (a1)
Abstract

A rediscovery of the long-forgotten republican version of liberal political theory has arresting implications for the theory and practice of international relations. Republican liberalism has a theory of security that is superior to realism, because it addresses not only threats of war from other states but also the threat of despotism at home. In this view, a Hobson's choice between anarchy and hierarchy is not necessary because an intermediary structure, here dubbed “negarchy,” is also available. The American Union from 1787 until 1861 is a historical example. This Philadelphian system was not a real state since, for example, the union did not enjoy a monopoly of legitimate violence. Yet neither was it a state system, since the American states lacked sufficient autonomy. While it shared some features with the Westphalian system such as balance of power, it differed fundamentally. Its origins owed something to particular conditions of time and place, and the American Civil War ended this system. Yet close analysis indicates that it may have surprising relevance for the future of contemporary issues such as the European Union and nuclear governance.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Maurizio Viroli , From Politics to Reason of State: The Acquisition and Transformation of the Language of Politics 1250–1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)

Nicholas Onuf , “Civitas Maxima: Wolff, Vattel, and the Fate of Republicanism, American Journal of International Law 88 (041994), pp. 288289

Peter S. Onuf , “Reflections on the Founding: Constitutional Historiography in Bicentennial Perspective,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd series, 46 (Summer1989)

Donald Lutz , “The Relative Influence of European Writers in Late Eighteenth Century Political Thought,” American Political Science Review 78 (031984), pp. 8997

Charles Tilly , “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” in Peter B. Evans , Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol , eds., Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)

Stephen Krasner , “Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective,” Comparative Political Studies 21 (041988), pp. 6694

Nicholas Onuf , “Sovereignty: Outline of a Conceptual History,” Alternatives, vol. 16, no. 4, 1991, pp. 425446

Kenneth M. Stamp , “The Concept of a Perpetual Union,” Journal of American History 65 (061978), pp. 553

Herbert Storing , What the Antifederalists Were For (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981)

Peter Trubowitz , “Sectionalism and American Foreign Policy: The Political Geography of Consensus and Conflict,” International Studies Quarterly 36 (061992), pp. 173–90

Frederick D. Williams , ed., The Northwest Ordinance: Essays on Its Formulation, Provisions, and Legacy (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1989)

William Riker , “The Senate in American Federalism,” American Political Science Review 49 (061955), pp. 452469

Adam Watson , The Evolution of International Society (London: Routledge, 1992), pp. 1318

Robert Gilpin , War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)

Paul Schroeder , “The Nineteenth Century International System: Changes in Structure,” World Politics 39 (101986), pp. 126

Stephen Skrowronek , Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982)

Kalevi J. Holsti , Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)

Helen Milner , “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations: A Critique,” Review of International Studies 17 (011991), pp. 6785

V. G. Kiernan , The Duel in European History: Honour and the Reign of the Aristocracy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986)

Joseph Nye , “Neorealism and Neoliberalism,” World Politics 40 (011988), pp. 235–51 and p. 246 in particular

Alexander Wendt , “Anarchy is What States Make of It,” International Organization 46 (Spring1992), pp. 391–425

Daniel T. Rodgers , “Republicanism: the Career of a Concept,” Journal of American History 79 (061992), pp. 1138

Anne-Marie Burley , “Law Among Liberal States: Liberalism and the Act of State Doctrine,” Columbia Law Review 92 (121992), pp. 1907–96

Daniel Deudney , “Dividing Realism: Security Materialism vs Structural Realism on Nuclear Security and Proliferation,” Security Studies 2 (Spring/Summer1993), pp. 736

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 40 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 409 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 30th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.