Skip to main content

Protecting Democracy in Europe and the Americas

  • Darren Hawkins (a1)

Especially since the end of the Cold War, the Council of Europe (CE) and the Organization of American States (OAS) have acted to protect democracy in their member states from erosion or reversals, with CE policies more robust than those in the Americas. What explains this variation? I develop an argument focusing on institutional permeability, or the extent to which those organizations are accessible to nonstate actors. Permeability consists of three dimensions: range of third parties allowed access, level of decision making at which access is granted, and transparency of IO information to those third parties. Higher levels of permeability are likely to produce higher levels of constraint on state behavior through increasing levels of precision and obligation in international rules and practices. Alternative explanations, summarized as regional democracy norms, domestic democratic lock-in interests, and the power of stable democracies cannot explain the variation in multilateral democracy protection. More broadly, this article suggests that “democratizing” IOs by allowing ever-greater access to nonstate actors is likely to result in stronger, more constraining international rules, even in areas where states most jealously guard their sovereignty, such as the nature of their domestic political institutions.

Hide All
Abbott Kenneth W., and Snidal Duncan. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3):421–56.
Barnett Michael, and Finnemore Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Benedetti Fanny, and Washburn John L.. 1999. Drafting the International Criminal Court Treaty: Two Years to Rome and an Afterword on the Rome Diplomatic Conference. Global Governance 5 (1):137.
Benoît-Rohmer Florence, and Klebes Heinrich. 2005. Council of Europe Law: Towards a Pan-European Legal Area. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Boniface Dexter S. 2002. Is There a Democratic Norm in the Americas? An Analysis of the Organization of American States. Global Governance 8 (3):365–81.
Carothers Thomas. 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Carr Edward Hallett. 1964. Twenty Years Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. New York: Harper and Row.
Checkel Jeffrey T. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):553–88.
Cooper Andrew F., and Legler Thomas. 2005. A Tale of Two Mesas: The OAS Defense of Democracy in Peru and Venezuela. Global Governance 11 (4):425–44.
Dimitrova Antoaneta, and Pridham Geoffrey. 2004. International Actors and Democracy Promotion in Central and Eastern Europe: The Integration Model and Its Limits. Democratization 11 (5):91112.
Eckstein Harry. 1975. Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In Handbook of Political Science. Vol. 7, Strategies of Inquiry, edited by Greenstein Fred I. and Polsby Nelson W., 79138. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Finnemore Martha, and Sikkink Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.
Flynn Gregory, and Farrell Henry. 1999. Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE, Norms, and the “Construction” of Security in Post–Cold War Europe. International Organization 53 (3):505535.
Garrett Geoffrey. 1992. International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market. International Organization 46 (2):533–60.
George Alexander L., and Bennett Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hafner-Burton Emilie, and Pollack Mark A.. 2002. Mainstreaming Gender in Global Governance. European Journal of International Relations 8 (3):339–73.
Hawkins Darren G., Lake David A., Nielson Daniel L., and Tierney Michael J.. 2006. Delegation Under Anarchy: States, International Organizations, and Principal-Agent Theory. In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by Hawkins Darren G., Lake David A., Nielson Daniel L., and Tierney Michael J., 338. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
Helfer Laurence R. 2006. Understanding Change in International Organizations: Globalization and Innovation in the ILO. Vanderbilt Law Review 59 (3):647726.
Jacoby Wade. 2006. Inspiration, Coalition, and Substitution: External Influences on Postcommunist Transformations. World Politics 58 (4):623–51.
Joachim Jutta. 2003. Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women's Rights. International Studies Quarterly 47 (2):247–74.
Keck Margaret E., and Sikkink Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Kelley Judith. 2004. International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions. International Organization 58 (3):425–57.
Keohane Robert O., Moravcsik Andrew, and Slaughter Anne-Marie. 2000. Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational. International Organization 54 (3):457–88.
Kitschelt Herbert P. 1986. Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 16 (1):5785.
Klebes Heinrich. 1999. The Quest for Democratic Security: The Role of the Council of Europe and U.S. Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.
Klepak Hal. 2003. Power Multiplied or Power Restrained? The United States and Multilateral Institutions in the Americas. In U.S. Hegemony and International Organizations, edited by Foot Rosemary, MacFarlane S. Neil, and Mastanduno Michael, 239–63. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Koremenos Barbara, Lipson Charles, and Snidal Duncan. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55 (4):761–99.
Levitt Barry S. 2006. A Desultory Defense of Democracy: OAS Resolution 1080 and the Inter-American Democratic Charter. Latin American Politics and Society 48 (3):93123.
Levitt Barry S. 2007. Ecuador, 2004–2005: Democratic Crisis Redux. In Promoting Democracy in the Americas, edited by Legler Thomas, Lean Sharon F., and Boniface Dexter S., 225–45. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Martin Lisa L., and Simmons Beth. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–57.
McCoy Jennifer. 2006. International Response to Democratic Threats in the Americas, 1990–2005. Paper presented at Latin American Studies Association Congress, March, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Mearsheimer John J. 1994–95. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3):549.
Meyer David S., and Minkoff Debra C.. 2004. Conceptualizing Political Opportunity. Social Forces 82 (4):1457–92.
Moravcsik Andrew. 2000. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2):217–52.
Muñoz Heraldo. 1998. The Right to Democracy in the Americas. Translated by Mary D'Leon. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 40 (1):118.
Nielson Daniel L., and Tierney Michael J.. 2003. Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform. International Organization 57 (2):241–76.
Pedaliu Effie G. H. 2007. Human Rights and Foreign Policy: Wilson and the Greek Dictators, 1967–1970. Diplomacy and Statecraft 18 (1):185214.
Pevehouse Jon C. 2005. Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
Raustiala Kal. 1997. States, NGOs, and International Environmental Institutions. International Studies Quarterly 41 (4):719–40.
Reimann Kim D. 2006. A View from the Top: International Politics, Norms and the Worldwide Growth of NGOs. International Studies Quarterly 50 (1):4567.
Risse Thomas. 2000. “Let's Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):139.
Robertson A. H., and Merrills J. G.. 1993. Human Rights in Europe: A Study of the European Convention on Human Rights. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
Santa-Cruz Arturo. 2005. Constitutional Structures, Sovereignty, and the Emergence of Norms: The Case of International Election Monitoring. International Organization 59 (3):663–93.
Schimmelfennig Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):4780.
Schimmelfennig Frank. 2005. Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe. International Organization 59 (4):827–60.
Shifter Michael. 2002. The United States, the Organization of American States, and the Origins of the Inter-American System. In The Globalization of U.S.-Latin American Relations, edited by Bouvier Virginia M., 85104. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Smith Karen E. 2001. Western Actors and the Promotion of Democracy. In Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe, edited by Zielonka Jan and Pravda Alex, 3157. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tarrow Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vachudová Milada Anna. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Valenzuela Arturo. 1997. Paraguay: The Coup That Didn't Happen. Journal of Democracy 8 (1):4355.
Winkler Hans. 1995. Democracy and Human Rights in Europe: A Survey of the Admission Practice of the Council of Europe. Austrian Journal of Public and International Law 47 (2–3):147–72.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 56 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 209 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.