Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety

  • Edward D. Mansfield (a1) and Diana C. Mutz (a2)
Abstract

Although it is widely acknowledged that an understanding of mass attitudes about trade is crucial to the political economy of foreign commerce, only a handful of studies have addressed this topic. These studies have focused largely on testing two models, both of which emphasize that trade preferences are shaped by how trade affects an individual's income. The factor endowments or Heckscher-Ohlin model posits that these preferences are affected primarily by a person's skills. The specific factors or Ricardo-Viner model posits that trade preferences depend on the industry in which a person works. We find little support for either of these models using two representative national surveys of Americans. The only potential exception involves the effects of education. Initial tests indicate that educational attainment and support for open trade are directly related, which is often interpreted as support for the Heckscher-Ohlin model. However, further analysis reveals that education's effects are less representative of skill than of individuals' anxieties about involvement with out-groups in their own country and beyond. Furthermore, we find strong evidence that trade attitudes are guided less by material self-interest than by perceptions of how the U.S. economy as a whole is affected by trade.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Adoni, Hannah, and Cohen, Akiba A.. 1978. Television Economic News and the Social Construction of Economic Reality. Journal of Communication 28 (4):6170.
Alston, Richard M., Kearl, J. R., and Vaughan, Michael B.. 1992. Is There a Consensus Among Economists in the 1990's? American Economic Review 82 (2):203–9.
Attewell, Paul. 1990. What Is Skill? Work and Occupations 17 (4):422–48.
Baker, Andy. 2003. Why Is Trade Reform So Popular in Latin America? A Consumption-Based Theory of Trade Policy Preferences. World Politics 55 (3):423–55.
Baker, Andy. 2005. Who Wants to Globalize? Consumer Tastes and Labor Markets in a Theory of Trade Policy Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 49 (4):924–38.
Balistreri, Edward J. 1997. The Performance of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Model in Predicting Endogenous Policy Forces at the Individual Level. Canadian Journal of Economics 30 (1):117.
Bauer, Raymond A., Pool, Ithiel de Sola, and Dexter, Lewis Anthony. 1963. American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade. New York: Atherton.
Beaulieu, Eugene, Benarroch, Michael, and Gaisford, James Donald. 2004. Intra-Industry Trade Liberalization, Wage Inequality and Trade Policy Preferences. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Canada.
Beaulieu, Eugene, Yatawara, Ravindra A., and Wang, Wei Guo. 2005. Who Supports Free Trade in Latin America? World Economy 28 (7):941–58.
Behr, Roy L., and Iyengar, Shanto. 1985. Television News, Real World Cues, and Changes in the Public Agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (1):3857.
Brody, Richard A., and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1977. From Life Space to Polling Place: The Relevance of Personal Concerns for Voting Behavior. British Journal of Political Science 7 (3):337–60.
Burgoon, Brian A., and Hiscox, Michael J.. 2004. The Mysterious Case of Female Protectionism: Gender Bias in Attitudes Toward International Trade. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric. 2000. Geography, International Trade, and Political Mobilization in U.S. Industries. American Journal of Political Science 44 (4):703–19.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, Feldman, Stanley, and Knight, Kathleen. 1986. Judging Inflation and Unemployment: The Origins of Retrospective Evaluations. Journal of Politics 48 (3):565–88.
Erbring, Lutz, Goldenberg, Edie N., and Miller, Arthur H.. 1980. Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by the Media. American Journal of Political Science 24 (1):1649.
Erikson, Robert S., and Tedin, Kent L.. 2005. American Public Opinion: Its Origin, Content and Impact. 7th ed.New York: Pearson-Longman.
Fordham, Benjamin O. 2008. Economic Interests and Public Support for American Global Activism. International Organization 62 (1):163–82.
Fordham, Benjamin O., and McKeown, Timothy J.. 2003. Selection and Influence: Interest Groups and Congressional Voting on Trade Policy. International Organization 57 (3):519–49.
Gabel, Matthew J. 1998. Interests and Information: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Green, Donald P., and Gerken, Ann E.. 1989. Self-Interest and Public Opinion toward Smoking Restrictions and Cigarette Taxes. Public Opinion Quarterly 53 (1):116.
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hiscox, Michael J.. 2006. Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes Toward International Trade. International Organization 60 (2):469–98.
Hays, Jude C., Ehrlich, Sean D., and Peinhardt, Clint. 2005. Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: Am Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis. International Organization 59 (2):473–94.
Herrmann, Richard K., Tetlock, Philip E., and Diascro, Matthew N.. 2001. How Americans Think About Trade: Reconciling Conflicts Among Money, Power, and Principles. International Studies Quarterly 45 (2):191218.
Hiscox, Michael J. 2006. Through a Glass and Darkly: Attitudes Toward International Trade and the Curious Effects of Issue Framing. International Organization 60 (3):755–80.
Kaltenthaler, Karl C., Gelleny, Ronald D., and Ceccoli, Stephen J.. 2004. Explaining Citizen Support for Trade Liberalization. International Studies Quarterly 48 (4):829–52.
Kam, Cindy, and Kinder, Donald R.. 2007. Terror and Ethnocentrism: Foundations of American Support for the War on Terrorism. Journal of Politics 69 (2):320–38.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. Sociotropic Politics: The American Case. British Journal of Political Science 11 (2):129–61.
Kocher, Matthew A., and Minushkin, Susan. 2006. Trade and Investment Policy Preferences and Public Opinion in Mexico. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, March, San Diego, Calif.
Kono, Daniel Y. 2008. Does Public Opinion Affect Trade Policy? Business and Politics 10 (2): Article 2. Available at ⟨http://www.bepress.com/bap/vol10/iss2/art2⟩. Accessed 31 March 2009.
Leamer, Edward E. 1984. Sources of International Comparative Advantage. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Levinson, Daniel J. 1949. An Approach to the Theory and Measurement of Ethnocentric Ideology. Journal of Psychology 28 (1):1939.
Long, J. Scott, and Freese, Jeremy. 2005. Regression Models for Categorical Outcomes Using Stata. 2d ed.College Station, Tex: Stata Press.
MacKuen, Michael Bruce, and Coombs, Stephen Lane. 1981. More Than News: Media Power in Public Affairs. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Maggiotto, Michael A., and Wittkopf, Eugene R.. 1981. American Public Attitudes toward Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly 25 (4):601–31.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Mutz, Diana C.. 2006. What Determines Perceptions of Trade's Influence on the US Economy? Paper presented at the 102d Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August-September, Philadelphia.
Mayda, Anna-Maria, and Rodrik, Dani. 2005. Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others? European Economic Review 49 (6):1393–430.
Mutz, Diana C. 1992. Mass Media and the Depoliticization of Personal Experience. American Journal of Political Science 36 (2):483508.
Mutz, Diana C. 1994. Contextualizing Personal Experience: The Role of Mass Media. Journal of Politics 56 (4):689714.
Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nie, Norman H., Junn, Jane, and Stehlik-Barry, Kenneth. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
O'Rourke, Kevin H., and Sinnott, Richard. 2002. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence. In Brookings Trade Forum, 2002, edited by Collins, Susan M. and Rodrik, Dani, 157206. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rankin, David M. 2001. Identities, Interests, and Imports. Political Behavior 23 (4):351–76.
Rodrik, Dani. 1995. Political Economy of Trade Policy. In Handbook of International Economics. Vol. 3, edited by Grossman, Gene M. and Rogoff, Kenneth, 1457–94. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2001. What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences? Journal of International Economics 54 (2):267–92.
Sears, David O., and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1990. Self-Interest in Americans' Political Opinions. In Beyond Self-Interest, edited by Mansbridge, Jane J., 147–70. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Spenner, Kenneth I. 1990. Skill: Meanings, Methods, and Measures. Work and Occupations 17 (4):399421.
Stolper, Wolfgang Friedrich, and Samuelson, Paul A.. 1941. Protection and Real Wages. Review of Economic Studies 9:5873.
Tyler, Tom R. 1980. Impact of Directly and Indirectly Experienced Events: The Origins of Crime-Related Judgments and Behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1):1328.
Tyler, Tom R. 1984. Assessing the Risk of Crime Victimization: The Integration of Personal Victimization Experience and Socially Transmitted Information. Journal of Social Issues 40 (1):2738.
Tyler, Tom R., and Cook, Fay L.. 1984. The Mass Media and Judgments of Risk: Distinguishing Impact on Personal and Societal Level Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (4):693708.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2008a. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). Available at ⟨http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html⟩. Accessed 31 March 2009.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2008b. DP-3, Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics: 2000. Available at ⟨http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_DP3&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-_lang=en&-_caller=geoselect&-state=qt&-format=⟩. Accessed 30 April 2009.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 2008. Industry Economic Accounts. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Available at ⟨http://www.bea.gov/industry/gdpbyind_data.htm⟩. Accessed 30 April 2009.
U.S. Department of Labor. 2008a. Standard Occupational Classification. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at ⟨http://www.bls.gov/soc/⟩. Accessed 30 April 2009.
U.S. Department of Labor. 2008b. Occupational Employment Statistics. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at ⟨http://www.bls.gov/oes/oes_dl.htm⟩. Accessed 30 April 2009.
U.S. International Trade Commission. 2008. USITC Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb. Available at ⟨http://dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/user_set.asp⟩. Accessed 30 April 2009.
Wittkopf, Eugene R., and Maggiotto, Michael A.. 1983. Elites and Masses: A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes Toward America's World Role. Journal of Politics 45 (2):303–34.
Worldviews. 2002. American Public Opinion and Foreign Policy. Chicago Council on Foreign Relations. Available at ⟨http://www.worldviews.org/detailreports/usreport.pdf⟩. Accessed 30 April 2009.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 70
Total number of PDF views: 1030 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 3769 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.