Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bas, Muhammet A. and McLean, Elena V. 2016. Natural Disasters and the Size of Nations. International Interactions, p. 1.

    Poast, Paul 2016. Dyads Are Dead, Long Live Dyads! The Limits of Dyadic Designs in International Relations Research. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 369.

    Ásgeirsdóttir, Áslaug and Steinwand, Martin 2015. Dispute settlement mechanisms and maritime boundary settlements. The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 119.

    Haklai, Oded 2015. From Independent Statehood to Minority Rights: The Evolution of National Self-determination as an International Order Principle in the Post-State Formation Era. Ethnopolitics, Vol. 14, Issue. 5, p. 461.

    Kadercan, Burak 2015. Triangulating territory: a case for pragmatic interaction between political science, political geography, and critical IR. International Theory, Vol. 7, Issue. 01, p. 125.

    Schultz, Kenneth A. 2015. Borders, Conflict, and Trade. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 125.

    Fazal, Tanisha M. and Griffiths, Ryan D. 2014. Membership Has Its Privileges: The Changing Benefits of Statehood. International Studies Review, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 79.

    Gibler, Douglas M. 2014. Contiguous States, Stable Borders, and the Peace between Democracies. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 58, Issue. 1, p. 126.

    GRIFFITHS, RYAN 2014. Secession and the invisible hand of the international system. Review of International Studies, Vol. 40, Issue. 03, p. 559.

    Johnson, Dominic D.P. and Toft, Monica Duffy 2014. Grounds for War: The Evolution of Territorial Conflict. International Security, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 7.

    Clark, Julian and Jones, Alun 2013. The great implications of spatialisation: Grounds for closer engagement between political geography and political science?. Geoforum, Vol. 45, p. 305.


The Making of the Territorial Order: New Borders and the Emergence of Interstate Conflict

  • David B. Carter (a1) and H. E. Goemans (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 14 April 2011

We argue that new international borders are rarely new. We propose that when states choose new borders they use previous administrative frontiers to solve a difficult short-term bargaining problem and a long-term coordination problem. With a unique new set of data collected specifically for this project, we systematically examine the new international borders of the twentieth century resulting from secession, partition, and the use of force. New international borders, we find, are drawn not according to principles of “nationalism” or defensible borders, but rather according to previous administrative frontiers. How borders are drawn has important consequences for international stability: borders drawn along previously existing internal or external administrative frontiers experience fewer future territorial disputes and have a much lower risk of militarized confrontation if a dispute emerges.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Joshua Castellino . 1999. Territory and Identity in International Law: The Struggle for Self-Determination in the Western Sahara. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 28 (3):523–51.

David Friedman . 1977. A Theory of the Size and Shape of Nations. Journal of Political Economy 85 (1):5977.

Paul K. Huth 1996. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

N. Kliot , and Y. Mansfield . 1997. The Political Landscape of Partition: The Case of Cyprus. Political Geography 16 (6):495521.

Alexander B. Murphy 1990. Historical Justifications for Territorial Claims. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80 (4):531–48.

Roger Myerson . 2009. Learning from Schelling's Strategy of Conflict. Journal of Economic Literature 47 (4):1109–25.

Norman J. G. Pounds 1951. The Origin of the Idea of Natural Frontiers in France. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 41 (2):146–57.

Norman J. G. Pounds 1954. France and ‘Les Limites Naturelles’ from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Centuries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 44 (1):5162.

Steven R. Ratner 1996. Drawing a Better Line: Uti possidetis and the Borders of New States. American Journal of International Law 90 (4):590624.

Peter Sahlins . 1990. Natural Frontiers Revisited: France's Boundaries since the Seventeenth Century. American Historical Review 95 (5):1423–51.

Alberto Sbacchi . 1979. Haile Selassie and the Italians, 1941–1943. African Studies Review 22 (1):2542.

Malcolm N. Shaw 1996. The Heritage of States: The Principle of Uti Possidetis Juris Today. British Yearbook of International Law 67:75154.

Malcolm N. Shaw 1997. Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries. European Journal of International Law 8:478507.

Beth A. Simmons 2002. Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance; International Institutions and Territorial Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (6):829–56.

Beth A. Simmons 2005. Rules over Real Estate; Trade, Territorial Conflict and International Borders as Institutions. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (6):823–48.

Jaroslav Tir . 2003. Averting Armed International Conflicts Through State-to-State Territorial Transfers. Journal of Politics 65 (4):12351257.

Jaroslav Tir . 2005a. Dividing Countries to Promote Peace: Prospects for Long-Term Success of Partitions. Journal of Peace Research 42 (5):545–62.

Jaroslav Tir . 2005b. Keeping the Peace After Secession: Territorial Conflicts Between Rump and Secessionist States. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (5):713–41.

Jaroslav Tir , Philip Shafer , Paul F. Diehl , and Gary Goertz . 1998. Territorial Changes, 1816–1996: Procedures and Data. Conflict Management and Peace Science 16 (1):8997.

R. Harrison Wagner . 2007. War and the State: The Theory of International Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *