Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 166
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Andrews, Nathan 2016. A Swiss-Army Knife? A Critical Assessment of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Ghana. Business and Society Review, Vol. 121, Issue. 1, p. 59.

    Carstensen, Martin B. and Schmidt, Vivien A. 2016. Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 318.

    Cormier, Ben 2016. Empowered borrowers? tracking the World Bank’s Program-for-Results. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 209.

    Del Sarto, Raffaella A. 2016. Normative Empire Europe: The European Union, its Borderlands, and the ‘Arab Spring’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 54, Issue. 2, p. 215.

    Hofferberth, Matthias 2016. “Confusion is a fundamental state of mind”—On the peculiar intellectual career of global governance in international relations. Palgrave Communications, Vol. 2, p. 15044.

    Kollman, Kelly 2016. Pioneering marriage for same-sex couples in the Netherlands. Journal of European Public Policy, p. 1.

    Lantis, Jeffrey S. 2016. Nonproliferation and Norm Discourse: An Agentic Constructivist Model of U.S. Nuclear Export Policy Changes. Politics & Policy, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 220.

    Menashy, Francine 2016. Understanding the roles of non-state actors in global governance: evidence from the Global Partnership for Education. Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 98.

    Nelson, Chad E. 2016. The Evolution of Norms: American Policy toward Revolution in Iran and Egypt. Journal of Human Rights, p. 00.

    Palmer, Emma 2016. Localizing international criminal accountability in Cambodia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 97.

    Sanders, Rebecca 2016. Norm Proxy War and Resistance Through Outsourcing: The Dynamics of Transnational Human Rights Contestation. Human Rights Review, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 165.

    Stoeckl, Kristina 2016. The Russian Orthodox Church as moral norm entrepreneur. Religion, State and Society, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 132.

    Adler-Nissen, Rebecca 2015. The European External Action Service.

    Gutterman, Ellen 2015. Easier Done Than Said: Transnational Bribery, Norm Resonance, and the Origins of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 109.

    Heiduk, Felix 2015. What is in a name? Germany’s strategic partnerships with Asia’s rising powers. Asia Europe Journal, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. 131.

    Hoffman, Steven J. and Røttingen, John-Arne 2015. Assessing the Expected Impact of Global Health Treaties: Evidence From 90 Quantitative Evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 105, Issue. 1, p. 26.

    Lantis, Jeffrey S. 2015. Nuclear Technology and Norm Stewardship: US Nonproliferation Policies Revisited. International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 423.

    Ruzicka, Jan and Keating, Vincent Charles 2015. Going global: Trust research and international relations. Journal of Trust Research, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 8.

    Tan, Lena 2015. Metropolitan Identities and Twentieth-Century Decolonization.

    Weeks, Gregory 2015. Fighting to close the School of the Americas: Unintended consequences of successful activism. Journal of Human Rights, p. 1.


What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge


Social constructivism in international relations has come into its own during the past decade, not only as a metatheoretical critique of currently dominant neo-utilitarian approaches (neo-realism and neoliberal institutionalism) but increasingly in the form of detailed empirical findings and theoretical insights. Constructivism addresses many of the same issues addressed by neo-utilitarianism, though from a different vantage and, therefore, with different effect. It also concerns itself with issues that neo-utilitarianism treats by assumption, discounts, ignores, or simply cannot apprehend within its characteristic ontology and/or epistemology. The constructivist project has sought to open up the relatively narrow theoretical confines of conventional approaches—by pushing them back to problematize the interests and identities of actors; deeper to incorporate the intersubjective bases of social action and social order; and into the dimensions of space and time to establish international structure as contingent practice, constraining social action but also being (re)created and, therefore, potentially transformed by it.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *