Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Who Are These Belligerent Democratizers? Reassessing the Impact of Democratization on War

  • Vipin Narang (a1) and Rebecca M. Nelson (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

In a key finding in the democratic peace literature, Mansfield and Snyder argue that states with weak institutions undergoing incomplete transitions to democracy are more likely to initiate an external war than other types of states. We show that the empirical data do not support this claim. We find a dearth of observations where incomplete democratizers with weak institutions participated in war. Additionally, we find that the statistical relationship between incomplete democratization and war is entirely dependent on the dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire prior to World War I. We also find that the case selection in Mansfield and Snyder rarely involved incomplete democratizers with weak institutions. We therefore conclude that the finding that incomplete democratizers with weak institutions are more likely to initiate or participate in war is not supported by the empirical data.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bachman David. 2000. China's Democratization: What Difference Would It Make for U.S.-China Relations? In What If China Doesn't Democratize? Implications for War and Peace, edited by Friedman Edward and McCormick Barrett L., 195223. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
Bates Robert H. 2008. State Failure. Annual Review of Political Science 11:112.
Biddle Stephen. 2006. Seeing Baghdad, Thinking Saigon. Foreign Affairs 85 (2):214.
Braumoeller Bear F. 2004. Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms. International Organization 58 (4):807–20.
Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, Morrow James D., Siverson Randolph M., and Smith Alastair. 1999. An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review 93 (4):791807.
Dupuy R. Ernest, and Dupuy Trevor N.. 1993. The Harper Collins Encyclopedia of Military History: From 3500 B.C. to the Present. New York: HarperCollins.
Enterline Andrew J. 1996. Driving While Democratizing (DWD). International Security 20 (4):183–96.
Erickson Edward J. 2003. Defeat in Detail: The Ottoman Army in the Balkans, 1912–13. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
Flintoff Corey. 2006. Study Contradicts Bush Rationale on Democracy. National Public Radio broadcast, 27 January. Available at ⟨http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5174376⟩. Accessed 7 January 2009.
Fravel M. Taylor. 2008. The Limits of Diversion: Rethinking Internal and External Conflict. Unpublished manuscript.
Goldstone Jack A., Bates Robert H., Gurr Ted Robert, Lustik Michael, Marshall Monty G., Ulfelder Jay, and Woodward Mark. 2005. A Global Forecasting Model of Political Instability. Paper presented at the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Political Science AssociationSeptemberWashington, D.C.
Hegre Håvard, Ellingsen Tanja, Gates Scott, and Gleditsch Nils Petter. 2001. Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War 1816–1992. American Political Science Review 95 (1):3348.
Holmes Richard. 2001. The Oxford Companion to Military History. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan Fred. 2005. Elections Aren't Enough: Seeing Iraqis Vote Is Wonderful but You Can't Rush Democracy. Slate. 15 December 2005. Available at ⟨http://www.slate.com/id/2132506/⟩. Accessed 7 January 2009.
King Gary, and Zeng Langche. 2001. Improving Forecasts of State Failure. World Politics 53 (4):623–58.
King Gary, and Zeng Langche. 2007. When Can History Be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference. International Studies Quarterly 51 (1):183210.
Mansfield Edward D., and Snyder Jack L.. 1995a. Democratization and the Danger of War. International Security 20 (1):538.
Mansfield Edward D., and Snyder Jack L.. 1995b. Democratization and War. Foreign Affairs 74 (3):7997.
Mansfield Edward D., and Snyder Jack L.. 1996. The Effects of Democratization on War (The Authors Reply). International Security 20 (4):196207.
Mansfield Edward D., and Snyder Jack L.. 2002. Democratic Transitions, Institutional Strength, and War. International Organization 56 (2):297337.
Mansfield Edward D., and Snyder Jack L.. 2005. Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mansfield Edward D., and Snyder Jack L.. 2005/2006. Prone to Violence: The Paradox of the Democratic Peace. National Interest 82 (Winter):3945.
Mansfield Edward D., and Snyder Jack L.. 2007. The Sequencing “Fallacy.” Journal of Democracy 18 (3):59.
Marshall Monty G., and Jaggers Keith. 2007. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2006. Dataset Users' Manual. Center for Systemic Peace. Available at ⟨http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2006.pdf⟩. Accessed 7 January 2009.
McFaul Michael. 2007. Are New Democracies War-Prone? Journal of Democracy 18 (2):160–67.
Oneal John R., and Russett Bruce. 1997. The Classic Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985. International Studies Quarterly 41 (2):267–94.
Sater William F. 2007. Andean Tragedy: Fighting the War of the Pacific 1879–1884. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Snyder Jack. 2004. One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy 145:5262.
Thompson William R., and Tucker Richard M.. 1997. A Tale of Two Democratic Peace Critiques. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (3):428–54.
Wang Jianwei. 2008. Time for ‘New’ Thinking on Taiwan. China Security 4 (1):113–29.
Ward Michael D., and Gleditsch Kristian S.. 1998. Democratizing for Peace. American Political Science Review 92 (1):5161.
Weede Eric. 1996. Correspondence: Democratization and War. International Security 20 (4):180–83.
Wolf Reinhold. 1996. Correspondence: Democratization and War. International Security 20 (4):176–80.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 101 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 491 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.