Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism

Abstract

In this paper, we explain why the U.S. government chose multilateral security arrangements in Europe and bilateral ones in Asia in the 1940s and 1950s. After reviewing the inadequacies of a number of universal and indeterminate explanations, we put forward three explanations—great power status, efficient responses to threats, and regional identity—which rely on the combination of material and social forces for their explanatory power. Starting with common rationalist explanations that focus on material capabilities and institutional efficiency to explain the forms of international cooperation, we add to them the important effect that America's collective identity had on the formulation of its foreign policy goals. U.S. policymakers believed that the United States was a natural part of the North Atlantic community but that Southeast Asia was part of an alien political community. This difference helped drive the U.S. government to adopt divergent policies in two regions that, far from being natural, were constructed politically only in the 1940s. We conclude by pointing to the advantage of eclectic combinations of rationalist and constructivist insights, with an extension to the politics of regional collective identity in the 1990s.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Emanuel Adler , and Michael Barnett , eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dennis C. Blair , and John T. Hanley Jr., 2001. From Wheels to Webs: Reconstructing Asia-Pacific Security Arrangements. The Washington Quarterly 24 (1):717.

Thomas Borstelmann . 1999. Jim Crow's Coming Out: Race Relations and American Foreign Policy in the Truman Years. Presidential Studies Quarterly 29 (3):549–69.

Michael Brenner . 1995. Conclusion. In Multilateralism and Western Strategy, edited by Michael Brenner , 232–36. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Warren I. Cohen 2000. America's Response to China: A History of Sino-American Relations. 4th ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

John S. Duffield 2001. Why is There No APTO? Why is There No OSCAP? Asia-Pacific Security Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Contemporary Security Policy 22 (2):6995.

John Foster Dulles . 1952. Security in the Pacific. Foreign Affairs 30 (2):175–87.

Martin H. Folly 1988. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Britain, The United States, and the Genesis of the North Atlantic Treaty. Diplomatic History 12 (1):5977.

Benjamin O. Fordham 1998. Economic Interests, Party, and Ideology in Early Cold War Era U.S. Foreign Policy. International Organization 52 (2):359–96.

Jessica C. E. Gienow-Hecht 2000. Shame on US? Academics, Cultural Transfer, and the Cold War—A Critical Review. Diplomatic History 24 (3):465–94.

Mary Hampton . 1995. NATO at the Creation: U.S. Foreign Policy, West Germany, and the Wilsonian Impulse. Security Studies 4 (3):610–56.

Mary Hampton . 1998/1999. NATO, Germany, and the United States: Creating Positive Identity in Trans-Atlantia. Security Studies 8 (2–3):235–69.

Alan K. Henrikson 1975. The Map as an Idea: The Role of Cartographic Imagery During the Second World War. The American Cartographer 2 (1):1953.

Gerald Horne . 1999. Race from Power: U.S. Foreign Policy and the General Crisis of “White Supremacy.” Diplomatic History 23 (3):437–61.

Barbara Koremenos , Charles Lipson , and Duncan Snidal . 2001. Rational Design: Looking Back to Move Forward. International Organization 55 (4):10511082.

Mark Laffey , and Jutta Weldes . 1997. Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 3 (2):193237.

Jeffrey W. Legro 2000. Whence American Internationalism. International Organization 54 (2):253–90.

Geir Lundestad . 1999. “Empire by Invitation” in the American Century. Diplomatic History 23 (2):189217.

Arjun Makhijani . 1995. “Always” the Target? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 51 (3):2327.

Jonathan Mercer . 1995. Anarchy and Identity. International Organization 49 (2):229–52.

Anssi Paasi . 1986. The Institutionalization of Regions: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Emergence of Regions and the Constitution of Regional Identity. Fennia 164 (1):105–46.

John Gerard Ruggie . 1994. Third Try at World Order? America and Multilateralism After the Cold War. Political Science Quarterly 109 (4):553–70.

John Gerard Ruggie . 1997. The Past as Prologue: Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy. International Security 21 (4):89125.

John Gerard Ruggie . 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.

Frank Schimmelfennig . 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):4780.

Sheldon W. Simon 1993. The Clinton Administration and Asian Security: Toward Multilateralism. Australian Journal of International Affairs 47 (2):250–62.

Celeste A. Wallander 2000. Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War. International Organization 54 (4):705–35.

Paul Y. Watanabe 2001. Global Forces, Foreign Policy, and Asian Pacific Americans. Political Science and Politics 34 (3):639–44.

Steve Weber . 1991. Multilateralism in NATO: Shaping the Postwar Balance of Power, 1945–1961. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Alexander Wendt . 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 779 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1276 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.