Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 66
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cha, Jee-Weon and Strecker, Zoe 2016. Lack of musicality? Explaining anomalies in some senior Korean Christians’ hymn singing. Cogent Arts & Humanities, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 1159805.

    Bairner, Alan 2015. Asia's Land Down Under: the Socceroos and the 2015 Asian Cup. Asia Pacific Journal of Sport and Social Science, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Beeson, Mark 2015. Invasion by invitation: the role of alliances in the Asia-Pacific. Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 69, Issue. 3, p. 305.

    Funaiole, Matthew P. 2015. Conceptualizing Japan’s Foreign Policy Trajectory Through Social Identity Theory. East Asia, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 361.

    Hong, Ki-Joon 2015. A Path to “Emergent Peace” in Northeast Asia: The Shadow of the Past Matters. Asian Studies Review, Vol. 39, Issue. 3, p. 503.

    Nshimbi, Christopher Changwe 2015. Networks of Cross-border Non-State Actors: The Role of Social Capital in Regional Integration. Journal of Borderlands Studies, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 537.

    Zhang, Yongjin 2015. Regional international society in East Asia? A critical investigation. Global Discourse, Vol. 5, Issue. 3, p. 360.

    Chen, Dingding Pu, Xiaoyu and Johnston, Alastair Iain 2014. Debating China's Assertiveness. International Security, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 176.

    Dorussen, H. and Kirchner, E. J. 2014. Better a good neighbor than a distant friend: the scope and impact of regional security organizations. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 117.

    Jackson, V. 2014. Power, trust, and network complexity: three logics of hedging in Asian security. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 331.

    Kim, Inkyoung 2014. Messages from a middle power: participation by the Republic of Korea in regional environmental cooperation on transboundary air pollution issues. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 147.

    SON, KEY-YOUNG 2014. Middle Powers and the Rise of China: ‘Identity Norms’ of Dependency and Activism and the Outlook for Japan–South Korea Relations vis-à-vis the Great Powers. Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 15, Issue. 01, p. 91.

    Stein, A. A. 2014. Recalcitrance and initiative: US hegemony and regional powers in Asia and Europe after World War II. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 147.

    Chi, Sang-Hyun and Flint, Colin 2013. Standing different ground: the spatial heterogeneity of territorial disputes. GeoJournal, Vol. 78, Issue. 3, p. 553.

    Choi, Youngmi 2013. The Optimal Path of a China-Japan-Korea FTA: Multilateral Path or Sequential Path?. Pacific Focus, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 435.

    Cooley, Alexander and Nexon, Daniel H. 2013. “The Empire Will Compensate You”: The Structural Dynamics of the U.S. Overseas Basing Network.. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 11, Issue. 04, p. 1034.

    Fawcett, Louise 2013. Effective Multilateralism.

    Hafner-Burton, Emilie and Ron, James 2013. The Latin Bias: Regions, the Anglo-American Media, and Human Rights1. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 57, Issue. 3, p. 474.

    Lake, David A. 2013. Legitimating Power: The Domestic Politics of U.S. International Hierarchy. International Security, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 74.

    Murray, Philomena and Moxon-Browne, Edward 2013. The European Union as a Template for Regional Integration? The Case of ASEAN and Its Committee of Permanent Representatives. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 51, Issue. 3, p. 522.


Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism


In this paper, we explain why the U.S. government chose multilateral security arrangements in Europe and bilateral ones in Asia in the 1940s and 1950s. After reviewing the inadequacies of a number of universal and indeterminate explanations, we put forward three explanations—great power status, efficient responses to threats, and regional identity—which rely on the combination of material and social forces for their explanatory power. Starting with common rationalist explanations that focus on material capabilities and institutional efficiency to explain the forms of international cooperation, we add to them the important effect that America's collective identity had on the formulation of its foreign policy goals. U.S. policymakers believed that the United States was a natural part of the North Atlantic community but that Southeast Asia was part of an alien political community. This difference helped drive the U.S. government to adopt divergent policies in two regions that, far from being natural, were constructed politically only in the 1940s. We conclude by pointing to the advantage of eclectic combinations of rationalist and constructivist insights, with an extension to the politics of regional collective identity in the 1990s.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Emanuel Adler , and Michael Barnett , eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dennis C. Blair , and John T. Hanley Jr., 2001. From Wheels to Webs: Reconstructing Asia-Pacific Security Arrangements. The Washington Quarterly 24 (1):717.

Thomas Borstelmann . 1999. Jim Crow's Coming Out: Race Relations and American Foreign Policy in the Truman Years. Presidential Studies Quarterly 29 (3):549–69.

Michael Brenner . 1995. Conclusion. In Multilateralism and Western Strategy, edited by Michael Brenner , 232–36. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Warren I. Cohen 2000. America's Response to China: A History of Sino-American Relations. 4th ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

John S. Duffield 2001. Why is There No APTO? Why is There No OSCAP? Asia-Pacific Security Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Contemporary Security Policy 22 (2):6995.

John Foster Dulles . 1952. Security in the Pacific. Foreign Affairs 30 (2):175–87.

Martin H. Folly 1988. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Britain, The United States, and the Genesis of the North Atlantic Treaty. Diplomatic History 12 (1):5977.

Benjamin O. Fordham 1998. Economic Interests, Party, and Ideology in Early Cold War Era U.S. Foreign Policy. International Organization 52 (2):359–96.

Jessica C. E. Gienow-Hecht 2000. Shame on US? Academics, Cultural Transfer, and the Cold War—A Critical Review. Diplomatic History 24 (3):465–94.

Mary Hampton . 1995. NATO at the Creation: U.S. Foreign Policy, West Germany, and the Wilsonian Impulse. Security Studies 4 (3):610–56.

Mary Hampton . 1998/1999. NATO, Germany, and the United States: Creating Positive Identity in Trans-Atlantia. Security Studies 8 (2–3):235–69.

Alan K. Henrikson 1975. The Map as an Idea: The Role of Cartographic Imagery During the Second World War. The American Cartographer 2 (1):1953.

Gerald Horne . 1999. Race from Power: U.S. Foreign Policy and the General Crisis of “White Supremacy.” Diplomatic History 23 (3):437–61.

Barbara Koremenos , Charles Lipson , and Duncan Snidal . 2001. Rational Design: Looking Back to Move Forward. International Organization 55 (4):10511082.

Mark Laffey , and Jutta Weldes . 1997. Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 3 (2):193237.

Jeffrey W. Legro 2000. Whence American Internationalism. International Organization 54 (2):253–90.

Geir Lundestad . 1999. “Empire by Invitation” in the American Century. Diplomatic History 23 (2):189217.

Arjun Makhijani . 1995. “Always” the Target? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 51 (3):2327.

Jonathan Mercer . 1995. Anarchy and Identity. International Organization 49 (2):229–52.

Anssi Paasi . 1986. The Institutionalization of Regions: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Emergence of Regions and the Constitution of Regional Identity. Fennia 164 (1):105–46.

John Gerard Ruggie . 1994. Third Try at World Order? America and Multilateralism After the Cold War. Political Science Quarterly 109 (4):553–70.

John Gerard Ruggie . 1997. The Past as Prologue: Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy. International Security 21 (4):89125.

John Gerard Ruggie . 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.

Frank Schimmelfennig . 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):4780.

Sheldon W. Simon 1993. The Clinton Administration and Asian Security: Toward Multilateralism. Australian Journal of International Affairs 47 (2):250–62.

Celeste A. Wallander 2000. Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War. International Organization 54 (4):705–35.

Paul Y. Watanabe 2001. Global Forces, Foreign Policy, and Asian Pacific Americans. Political Science and Politics 34 (3):639–44.

Steve Weber . 1991. Multilateralism in NATO: Shaping the Postwar Balance of Power, 1945–1961. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Alexander Wendt . 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *