Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 105
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Adriaensen, Johan 2016. National Administrations in EU Trade Policy.

    Adriaensen, Johan 2016. National Administrations in EU Trade Policy.

    Chaudoin, Stephen Kucik, Jeffrey and Pelc, Krzysztof 2016. Do WTO Disputes Actually Increase Trade?. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 294.

    Hollweg, Claire H. Lederman, Daniel and Mitra, Devashish 2016. Structural Reforms and Labour-market Outcomes: International Panel-data Evidence. The World Economy, Vol. 39, Issue. 7, p. 925.

    Mahdi Ghodsi, M. 2016. Determinants of specific trade concerns raised on technical barriers to trade EU versus non-EU. Empirica,

    Oplatka, Izhar and Arar, Khalid Husny 2016. Leadership for social justice and the characteristics of traditional societies: ponderings on the application of western-grounded models. International Journal of Leadership in Education, Vol. 19, Issue. 3, p. 352.

    Pinto, Pablo M. and Weymouth, Stephen 2016. Partisan Cycles in Offshore Outsourcing: Evidence from U.S. Imports. Economics & Politics,

    Wang, Zhiyuan 2016. Institutionalized Autocracies, Policy Interdependence and Labor Rights. Journal of Human Rights, p. 00.

    Weinberg, Joe 2016. European Union Member States in Cross-National Analyses: The Dangers of Neglecting Supranational Policymaking. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60, Issue. 1, p. 98.

    Aklin, Michaël Arias, Eric Deniz, Emine and Peter Rosendorff, B. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    Bader, Julia 2015. The political economy of external exploitation. A comparative investigation of China's foreign relations. Democratization, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Böhmelt, Tobias 2015. Environmental Interest Groups and Authoritarian Regime Diversity. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 315.

    Boudreaux, Christopher J. 2015. The Evolutionary Effects of Democracy: In the Long Run, We are All Trading?. The International Trade Journal, Vol. 29, Issue. 5, p. 376.

    Chou, Kuang-Hann Chen, Chien-Hsun and Mai, Chao-Cheng 2015. Factors Influencing China’s Exports with a Spatial Econometric Model. The International Trade Journal, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 191.

    Crescenzi, Mark J.C. and Kadera, Kelly M. 2015. Built to Last: Understanding the Link between Democracy and Conflict in the International System. International Studies Quarterly, p. n/a.

    Doces, John A. and Magee, Christopher S. P. 2015. Trade and Democracy: A Factor-Based Approach. International Interactions, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 407.

    Earnest, David C. 2015. Expanding the Electorate: Comparing the Noncitizen Voting Practices of 25 Democracies. Journal of International Migration and Integration, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Efrat, Asif 2015. Promoting trade through private law: Explaining international legal harmonization. The Review of International Organizations,

    Gallagher, Mary E. and Hanson, Jonathan K. 2015. Power Tool or Dull Blade? Selectorate Theory for Autocracies. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 367.

    Hsueh, Roselyn 2015. Nations or Sectors in the Age of Globalization: China's Policy Toward Foreign Direct Investment in Telecommunications. Review of Policy Research, Vol. 32, Issue. 6, p. 627.


Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries

  • Helen V. Milner and Keiko Kubota (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2005

Rising international trade flows are a primary component of globalization. The liberalization of trade policy in many developing countries has helped foster the growth of these flows. Preceding and concurrent with this move to free trade, there has been a global movement toward democracy. We argue that these two trends are related: democratization of the political system reduces the ability of governments to use trade barriers as a strategy for building political support. Political leaders in labor-rich countries may prefer lower trade barriers as democracy increases. Empirical evidence supports our claim about the developing countries from 1970–99. Regime change toward democracy is associated with trade liberalization, controlling for many factors. Conventional explanations of economic reform, such as economic crises and external pressures, seem less salient. Democratization may have fostered globalization in this period.We wish to thank the editors at International Organization, David Baldwin, Jim Fearon, Geoffrey Garrett, Barbara Geddes, Tim Groseclose, Robert Kaufmann, Robert Keohane, David Laitin, Jean Leca, Edward Mansfield, Jim Morrow, Ronald Rogowski, B. Peter Rosendorff, Alex Segura, Mike Tomz, Robert Trager, Romain Wacziarg, and Greg Wawro, for their very helpful comments on versions of this article. We also received helpful comments from seminar participants at the University of Michigan, Stanford University, the University of Pennsylvania, Syracuse University, Princeton University, Rutgers University, Yale University, and the University of California at Berkeley. Ben Judkins, Robert Trager, Megumi Naoi, and Tom Kenyon provided invaluable research assistance. An earlier version was presented at the 2001 APSA meeting in San Francisco.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *