Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
EnglishFrançais
International Psychogeriatrics International Psychogeriatrics

Article contents

On studying ageism in long-term care: a systematic review of the literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2016

José Manuel Sousa de São José [Opens in a new window]  and
Carla Alexandra Filipe Amado
José Manuel Sousa de São José
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, University of Algarve and CIEO, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal
Carla Alexandra Filipe Amado
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, University of Algarve and CEFAGE-UAlg, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal
Corresponding
E-mail address:
jsjose@ualg.pt
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Ageism in long-term care is pervasive, but it is not easy to define, to identify and to fight it in practice. These difficulties could be overcome if we develop research capable to conceptualize, detect, measure, and understand the multidimensionality and complexity of ageism. Nevertheless, to achieve this, it is fundamental to know how ageism in long-term care has been previously studied.

Methods: This paper systematically reviews studies on ageism in long-term care services published before October 2015 and indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, and Social Care Online electronic databases. Electronic searches were complemented with visual scanning of reference lists and hand searching of leading journals in the field of gerontology. Four specific review questions were addressed: Which analytical angles (aetiology, prevalence, manifestations, consequences, and interventions) have been explored? Which theories and concepts have been used? Which methods have been employed? Which variants of ageism have been covered?

Results: Studies have focused mainly on the manifestations, etiology, and prevalence of ageism, neglecting its consequences and the interventions to tackle it; a significant number of studies used scales of ageism which, despite being appropriate considering the aims of the research, present important limitations; most studies have focused on residential services, neglecting non-residential services; some of the variants of ageism have been well covered, while implicit and self-ageism have been under-explored.

Conclusions: Research on ageism in long-term care services is scarce but important. Much has been done but much remains to be done. An agenda for future research is presented.

Keywords

ageism age-discrimination long-term care systematic review
Type
Review Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , March 2017 , pp. 373 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Abrams, D., Swift, H. J., Lamont, R. A. and Drury, L. (2015). The Barriers to and Enablers of Positive Attitudes to Ageing and Older People, At the Societal and Individual Level. Foresight, Government Office for Science. Kent: University of Kent. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/454735/gs-15-15-future-ageing-attitudes-barriers-enablers-er06.pdf; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Alley, D. E., Putney, N. M., Rice, M. and Bengtson, V. L. (2010). The increasing use of theory in social gerontology: 1990–2004. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65, 583–590. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angus, J. and Reeve, P. (2006). Ageism: a threat to “Aging Well” in the 21st Century. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 25, 137. doi: 10.1177/0733464805285745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayalon, L. (2014). Perceived age, gender, and racial/ethnic discrimination in Europe: results from the European social survey. Educational Gerontology, 40, 499–517. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2013.845490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayalon, L. (2015). Perceptions of old age and aging in the continuing care retirement community. International Psychogeriatrics, 27, 611–6620. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Band-Winterstein, T. (2013). Health care provision for older persons: the interplay between ageism and elder neglect. Journal of Applied Gerontology, XX, 1–15. doi: 10.1177/0733464812475308.Google Scholar
Bengtson, V. L., Gans, D., Pulney, N. M. and Silverstein, M. (2009). Handbook of Theories of Aging, 2nd edn. New York: Springer Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bettio, F. and Verashchagina, A. (2010). Long-Term Care for the Elderly. Provisions and Providers in 33 European Countries, EU Expert Group on Gender and Employment. Roma: Fondazione G. Brodolini.Google Scholar
Billings, J. (2006). Staff perceptions of ageist practice in the clinical setting: practice development project. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 7, 33–45. doi: org/10.1108/14717794200600012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodner, E., Cohen-Fridel, S. and Yaretzky, A. (2011). Sheltered housing or community dwelling: quality of life and ageism among elderly people. International Psychogeriatrics, 23, 1197–1204. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211001025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, H. et al. (2009). Older People's Vision for Long-term Care. Executive Summary. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Available at: http://www.cpa.org.uk/ltc/older-people-vision-for-care-full.pdf; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Butler, R. N. (1969). Age-ism: another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9, 243–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, R. N. (1975). Why Survive? Being old in America. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Bytheway, B. and Johnson, J. (2001). An evaluation of the use of diaries in a study of medication in later life. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 183–204. doi: 10.1080/13645570010029467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calasanti, T. M. and Slevin, K. F. (2006). Age Matters: Realigning Feminist Thinking. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carolan, C. M., Smith, A. and Forbat, L. (2015). Conceptualising psychological distress in families in palliative care: findings from a systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 29, 605–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condelius, A. and Andersson, M. (2015). Exploring access to care among older people in the last phase of life using the behavioural model of healthservices use: a qualitative study from the perspective of the next of kin of older persons who had died in a nursing home. BMC Geriatrics, 15, 138. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0126-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CRD (2009). Systematic Reviews. CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. York. Available at: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A., Norton, J. C., Norton, M. I. and Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: the pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 267–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs, D. et al. (2008). An ethnographic study of stigma and ageism in residential care or assisted living. The Gerontologist, 48, 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, S. (2014). The impact of power differentials on the care experiences of older people. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 26, 319–332. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2013.875970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunworth, M. and Kirwan, P. (2012). Do nurses and social workers have different values? An exploratory study of the care for older people. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 1–6. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.645172.Google ScholarPubMed
Ferraro, K. F. (2009). Theory welcome here. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Science, s 64b, 75–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraboni, M., Saltstone, R. and Hughes, S. (1990). The Fraboni scale of ageism (FSA): an attempt at a more precise measure of ageism. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 9, 55–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamliel, T. (2000). The lobby as an arena in the confrontation between acceptance and denial of old age. Journal of Aging Studies, 14, 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gething, L. (1994). Health professionals’ attitudes towards ageing and older people: preliminary report of the reactions to ageing questionnaire. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 13, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. (2011). Ageing abjection and embodiment in the fourth age. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J., Schimel, J. and Martens, A. (2002). Ageism: denying the face of the future. In Nelson, T. D. (ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons (pp. 27–48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hagestad, G. O. and Uhlenberg, P. (2005). The social separation of old and young: a root of ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 343–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00409.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, M., Rodrigues, R., Hoffmann, F., Gasior, K. and Marin, B. (2009). Facts and Figures on Long-Term Care. Europe and North America. Vienna: European Centre.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. N., Larsen, L. and Solem, P. E. (2009). A conceptual analysis of Ageism. Nordic Psychology, 61, 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, R. L. and Kane, R. A. (2005). Ageism in healthcare and long-term care. Generations, 29, 49–54.Google Scholar
Kogan, N. (1961). Attitudes towards old people: the development of a scale and examination of correlates. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafortune, G. and Balestat, G. (2007). Trends in Severe Disability Among Elderly People: Assessing the Evidence in 12 OECD Countries and the Future Implications. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 26. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/217072070078; last accessed 4 September 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagacé, M., Medouar, F., Loock, J. and Davignon, A. (2011). À mots couverts: le regard des aînés et des soignants sur la communication quotidienne et ses manifestations d'âgisme impliref. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 30, 185–196. doi: 10.1017/S0714980811000092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagacé, M., Tanguay, A., Lavallée, M., Laplante, J., Robichaud, S. (2012). The silent impact of ageist communication in long term care facilities: elders' perspectives on quality of life and coping strategies. Journal of Aging Studies, 26, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, R. A., Swift, H. J. and Abrams, D. (2015). A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychology and Aging, 31, 180–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, P. (1994). The third age, the fourth age and the future. Ageing & Society, 14, 436–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, B. R. (2003). Mind matters: cognitive and physical effects of aging self-stereotypes. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58B, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, B. R. and Banaji, M. R. (2002). Implicit ageism. In Nelson, T. D. (ed.), Ageism Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons (pp. 49–75). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, C. D. and Butler, L. (2007). Silent no more elderly women's stories of living with urinary incontinence in long term care. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 33, 14–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, J. L. and Ancoli-Israel, S. (2008). Sleep disturbances in long-term care. Clinical Geriatric Medicine, 24, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, K. E. (2003). Three faces of ageism: society, image and place. Ageing & Society, 23, 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6. Available at: http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097&representation=PDF; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google ScholarPubMed
Natan, M. B., Ataneli, M., Admenko, A. and Noy, R. H. (2013). Nurse assessment of residents’ pain in a long-term care facility. International Nursing Review, 60, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Health Service (2013). The Cavendish Review. An Independent Review into Healthcare Assistants and Support Workers in the NHS and Social Care Settings. London: National Health Servive. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/236212/Cavendish_Review.pdf; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. D. (2005). Ageism: prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neugarten, B. (1974). Age groups in American society and the rise of the young old. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 187–198. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 436–447. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X00001677.Google Scholar
North, M. S. and Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 982–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, M. S. and Fiske, S. T. (2013). Subtyping ageism: policy Issues in succession and consumption. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7, 36–57. doi: 10.1111/j.17512409.2012.01042.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2008). OECD Health Data 2008. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2011a). Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264097759-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2011b). Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2011-en; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
OECD/European Union (2013). A Good Life in Old Age? Monitoring and Improving Quality in Long-term Care, OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264194564-en; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Palmore, E. B. (1977). Facts on aging: a short quiz. The Gerontologist, 17, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmore, E. B. (1998). The Facts on Aging Quiz. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google ScholarPubMed
Palmore, E. B. (1999). Ageism: Negative and Positive. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Palmore, E. B. (2001). The ageism survey: first findings. The Gerontologist, 41, 572–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, A. D. and Mehlsen, M. (2011). Age-bias in staff appraisals of brain injury service provision? Nordic Psychology, 63, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M. and Warburton, J. (2012). Residential complexes in queensland, Australia: a space of segregation and ageism? Ageing & Society, 32, 60–84. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X10001534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popay, J. et al. (2006). Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. London: ESRC Research Methods Programme.Google Scholar
Reyna, C., Goodwin, E. J. and Ferrari, J. R. (2007). Older adult stereotypes among care providers in residential care facilities. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 33, 50–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberts, E., Robinson, J. and Seymor, L. (2002). Old Habits Die Hard: Tackling age Discrimination in Health and Social Care. London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
Rosencranz, H. A. and McNevin, T. E. (1969). A factor analysis of attitudes toward the aged. The Gerontologist, 9, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, E. G., Eckert, J. K. and Morgan, L. A. (2015). Stigma and discontinuity in multilevel senior housing's continuum of care. The Gerontologist, 00, 1–10. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv055.Google Scholar
Roth, E. G. et al. (2012). Baby Boomers in an active adult retirement community: comity interrupted. The Gerontologist, 52, 189–198. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Vodanovich, S. J. and Credé, M. (2005). The multidimensional nature of ageism: construct validity and group differences. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snellman, F. (2016). Whose ageism? The reinvigoration and definitions of an elusive concept. Nordic Psychology, 68, 148–159. doi: 10.1080/19012276.2015.1125301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taverna, M. V., Nguyen, C, Wright, R. Tysinger, J. W. and Sorenson, H. M. (2014). Iatro-compliance: an unintended consequence of excessive autonomy in long term care facilities. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 88, 53–60.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. and Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, N. (2006). Anti-discriminatory Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. H. (2005). A new approach for theoretically integrating micro and macro analysis. In Calhoun, C., Rojek, C. and Turner, B. S. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Sociology (pp. 405–422). New York: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Y., Foreman, P., Gething, L. and Petralia, W. (2004). Nurses’ attitudes toward aging and older adults – examining attitudes and practices among health services providers in Australia. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 30, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, S., Dobbs, D., Roth, E. G., Goldman, S., Peeples, A. D. and Wallace, B. (2014). Promoting and protecting against stigma in assisted living and nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 00, 1–13. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

São José and Amado supplementary material

Box S1

[Opens in a new window]
File 19 KB

São José and Amado supplementary material

Box S2

[Opens in a new window]
File 23 KB

São José and Amado supplementary material

Table S1

[Opens in a new window]
File 41 KB

São José and Amado supplementary material

Table S2

[Opens in a new window]
File 23 KB

São José and Amado supplementary material

Table S3

[Opens in a new window]
File 21 KB

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 101
Total number of PDF views: 684 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 17th November 2016 - 5th December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

8 Cited by
Hostname: page-component-b4dcdd7-9fdqb Total loading time: 0.449 Render date: 2020-12-05T09:14:56.073Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Sat Dec 05 2020 09:00:06 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

On studying ageism in long-term care: a systematic review of the literature
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

On studying ageism in long-term care: a systematic review of the literature
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

On studying ageism in long-term care: a systematic review of the literature
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *