Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The sensitivity and specificity of the Modified Conflict Tactics Scale for detecting clinically significant elder abuse

  • Claudia Cooper (a1), Kate Maxmin (a1), Amber Selwood (a1), Martin Blanchard (a1) and Gill Livingston (a1)...
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Background: A third of family carers of people with dementia describe acting abusively in research studies, but far fewer cases of abuse are currently detected in clinical situations. This discrepancy may be explained by inadequate detection by health professionals, or disagreement regarding what constitutes elder abuse. This study was undertaken to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the revised Modified Conflict Tactics Scale (MCTS) for detecting clinically significant abuse.

Methods: We interviewed 220 family carers of people consecutively referred to psychiatric services with dementia in Essex and London (U.K.), using the MCTS to measure abuse. We defined abuse cases using (1) the MCTS conventional scoring system; (2) the Pillemer criteria; and (3) clinical judgment of an expert panel.

Results: Our panel judged that 15 (6.8%) of carers reported potentially clinical concerning abusive behavior; but 47 (21%) were cases according to the Pillemer criteria and 74 (34%) using the MCTS conventional scoring system. We developed a weighted MCTS scoring system, with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting clinically concerning abuse.

Conclusions: The MCTS could be used routinely in clinical practice with carers of people with dementia to detect clinically concerning cases of abuse, many of which are currently being missed.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence should be addressed to: Claudia Cooper, Dept of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, Holborn Union Building, Archway Campus, Highgate Hill, London, N19 5LW, U.K. Phone: +44 (0) 207 2885931. Email: ccooper@doctors.org.uk.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. R. Beach , R. Schulz , G. M. Williamson , L. S. Miller , M. F. Weiner and C. E. Lance (2005). Risk factors for potentially harmful informal caregiver behavior. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 255261.

C. Cooper , M. Manela , C. Katona and G. Livingston (2008a). Screening for elder abuse in dementia in the LASER-AD study: prevalence, correlates and validation of instruments. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 283288.

C. Cooper , A. Selwood and G. Livingston (2008b). The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review. Age and Ageing, 37, 151160.

C. Cooper , A. Selwood , M. Blanchard , Z. Walker , R. Blizard and G. Livingston (2009) Abuse of people with dementia by family carers: representative cross sectional survey. BMJ, 338, b155; doi: 10.1136/bmj.b155.

T. Fulmer (2005). Dyadic vulnerability/risk profiling for elder neglect. Gerontologist, 45, 498.

M. S. Lachs , C. S. Williams , S. O'Brien , K. A. Pillemer and M. E. Charlson (1998). The mortality of elder mistreatment. JAMA, 280, 428432.

D. Nelson (2002). Violence against elderly people: a neglected problem. Lancet, 360, 1094.

R. A. Oswald , G. J. Jogerst , J. M. Daly and S. E. Bentler (2004). Iowa family physician's reporting of elder abuse. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 16, 7588.

K. Pillemer and D. Finkelhor (1988). The prevalence of elder abuse: a random sample survey. Gerontologist, 28, 5157.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Psychogeriatrics
  • ISSN: 1041-6102
  • EISSN: 1741-203X
  • URL: /core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: