Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:28:58.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring the association between optimism and quality of life among informal caregivers of persons with dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2018

Pablo Ruisoto*
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Israel Contador
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Bernardino Fernández-Calvo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University Federal of Paraiba, Paraiba, Brazil
David Palenzuela
Affiliation:
Department of Personality, Psychological Evaluation and Treatment, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Francisco Ramos
Affiliation:
Department of Personality, Psychological Evaluation and Treatment, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Prof. Pablo Ruisoto, Department of Basic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, University of Salamanca, Avda. De la Merced, 109-131, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain. Phone: +34-669-197-002. Email: ruisoto@usal.es.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

We aimed to analyze the relationship between optimism and quality of life (QoL) among informal caregivers of patients with dementia (PWD).

Design:

In this cross-sectional study, a hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the association between optimism and caregiver's QoL after controlling the effect of different covariates, including burden.

Participants:

A sample of 130 PWD and their informal caregivers underwent a comprehensive protocol of assessment.

Measurements:

Caregivers completed the Battery of Generalized Expectancies of Control Scales, the Zarit Burden Interview, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief as measure of QoL. Optimism was estimated based on the combination of three expectancies of control, namely, self-efficacy, contingency, and success.

Results:

QoL correlated positively with optimism and negatively with burden. Optimism predicted each dimension of QoL, even after controlling for the effect of sociodemographic, care-recipients’ clinical covariates, and burden in all models.

Conclusion:

Optimism consistently predicted well-being and QoL in informal caregivers of PWD.

Type
Original Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2018 

Introduction

Approximately, 47 million people worldwide were living with dementia in 2015, and the figure is likely to double in 20 years (Prince et al., Reference Prince, Ali, Guerche, Prina, Albanese and Wu2016). In this context, numerous studies have found a robust relationship between caring for patients with dementia (PWD) and negative health outcomes (Etters et al., Reference Etters, Goodall and Harrison2008). Caring for PWD involves important demands that may lead to exhaustion, frustration, and other adverse reactions among informal caregivers when the situation is maintained over time. In the case of caring for patients with Alzheimer's disease, the degree of dependence on the caregiver increases progressively and irreversibly, creating a perfect context for the occurrence of stress-related health problems. Not surprisingly, caring for a PWD has been considered even more stressful than caring for a person with a physical disability (Ory et al., Reference Ory, Hoffman, Yee, Tennstedt and Schulz1990).

It is well known that exposure to stress is associated with different health problems through the immune dysfunction (Glaser and Kiecolt-Glaser, Reference Glaser and Kiecolt-Glaser2005; Kemeny and Schedlowski, Reference Kemeny and Schedlowski2007), although coping strategies can help ameliorate the negative effect of stress on health and well-being (Raggi et al., Reference Raggi, Tasca, Panerai, Neri and Ferri2015; Snyder et al., Reference Snyder2015). In the context of caregiving, Pearlin et al.’s (Reference Pearlin, Mullan, Semple and Skaff1990) stress model underlines the importance of the subjective appraisal of resources to deal with the situation of caring, compared with the objective burden, such as degree of dependency or behavioral disturbances. Therefore, it seems that optimistic people use more problem-focused and adaptive coping strategies (Carver and Scheier, Reference Carver and Scheier2014). In this study, we adopted a perspective of optimism (also referred as “grounded” optimism) based on an integrated and multidimensional approach of generalized expectancies of control (GEC; Palenzuela et al., Reference Palenzuela, Prieto, Barros and Almeida1997; Palenzuela, Reference Palenzuela2008). From this point of view, optimism may be defined as the conviction of being able to exercise control (self-efficacy component) in an environment perceived as controllable (contingency component), which supports expectancies of goal achievement (success or outcome component). Previous research has found that a higher level of optimism in caregivers predicted less burnout (Contador et al., Reference Contador, Fernández-Calvo, Palenzuela, Miguéis and Ramos2012) and reduced demands of institutional care (Contador et al., Reference Contador2015). Despite these observations, the relationship between optimism and quality of life (QoL) among informal caregivers remains elusive.

QoL is defined as individuals’ perceptions of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live, and in relation to their goals, expectancies, standards, and concerns (The WHOQOL Group, 2008). Previous studies have provided evidence supporting the case for control-related psychological resources and positive emotions (Roepke et al., Reference Roepke2008; Carver and Scheier, Reference Carver and Scheier2014) for the management of the adverse effects of caregivers’ role stress. Therefore, strategies to improve optimism or perception of control may improve the psychological adjustment. In this context, optimism may act as a mediator or moderator between known stress-related health risk factors and QoL (Márquez-González et al., Reference Márquez-González, Losada, Peñacoba and Romero-Moreno2009; Mausbach et al., Reference Mausbach2012). In fact, a protective relationship between optimism and all-cause mortality in old age has already been described (Giltay et al., Reference Giltay, Geleijnse, Zitman, Hoekstra and Schouten2004). However, as far as we know, the role of optimism as a psychological construct in QoL of informal caregivers of PWD remains unknown.

The objective of this study is to analyze the predictive value of optimism on perceived QoL among informal caregivers of PWD. To our knowledge, this is the first study attempting to evaluate this relationship considering the effect of different covariables, such as sociodemographic characteristics, patient's attributes, care situation, and burden. This research will potentially contribute to the development of interventions aimed at improving the well-being of caregivers of PWD.

Methods

Participants

A convenient sample of 130 informal caregivers (mean age = 58.62 ± 12.45; 36 males and 94 females) and their respective patients (mean age = 77.97 ± 6.02; 48 males and 82 females) was recruited through consecutive referrals to the local Association of Family Members of Patients with Alzheimer's (AFA) in Salamanca (semi-rural area, north western Spain). Informal caregivers who visited the AFA (from January to December 2009) because they were interested in specific adult day-care programs were invited to participate in the study. All caregivers volunteered to participate in the study. Their role was that of primary caregiver, taking on responsibility for any decisions and for the patient's well-being for at least 6 months. None of the caregivers were receiving specialized psychological support at the time of assessment, and they were living at home with the PWD. All care recipients met the DSM-IV-TR criteria for the diagnosis of dementia, which was corroborated by the general practitioner, and they were susceptible to receiving assistance in the AFA day-care center of Salamanca. A written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the AFA (Salamanca), conforming to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Measures

Information obtained about PWD included age, gender, education, type of dementia, and time since diagnosis. All patients underwent a standard assessment protocol including the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale (Hughes et al., Reference Hughes, Berg, Danziger, Coben and Martin1982) to assess the severity of the syndrome. In addition, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Folstein et al., Reference Folstein, Folstein and McHugh1975), the Barthel index (Mahoney and Barthel, Reference Mahoney and Barthel1965), and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Brief Questionnaire Form (NPI-Q) (Kaufer et al., Reference Kaufer2000) were used to assess the patients’ cognitive status, functional impairment, and psychopathological symptoms, respectively.

All caregivers were also interviewed in one session divided into two parts: a sociodemographic questionnaire and a psychological protocol using instruments developed and/or validated into Spanish. The caregivers’ questionnaire provided sociodemographics (age, sex, and education) and data about context of care (relationship with the patients and duration of caregiving). In addition, the following standardized measures were included in this survey: the Zarit Burden Interview (Zarit et al., Reference Zarit, Todd and Zarit1986), the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (Goldberg et al., Reference Goldberg, Bridges, Duncan-Jones and Grayson1988), the Battery of Generalized Expectancies of Control Scales (BEEGC, acronym in Spanish; Palenzuela et al., Reference Palenzuela, Prieto, Barros and Almeida1997), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief (WHOQOL-BRIEF; The WHOQOL Group, 1998; Lucas-Carrasco, Reference Lucas-Carrasco2012).

Assessment of optimism and quality of life

The BEEGC is based on Palenzuela's approach to personal control (Palenzuela et al., Reference Palenzuela, Prieto, Barros and Almeida1997). The questionnaire includes 20 items distributed in five GEC-related scales (contingency, self-efficacy, success, helplessness, and luck). Respondents rate their degree of agreement with each statement on a nine-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 9 (totally agree). Independent scores are obtained by adding the items contained in each scale, which are positively formulated (e.g. high scores on each dimension represent higher levels of this construct). Although each dimension measures different theoretical concepts, we combined the scores to study the targeted psychological construct of optimism (self-efficacy, contingency, and success; range: 3–27), based on the confirmatory factor analysis of Palenzuela et al. (Reference Palenzuela, Prieto, Barros and Almeida1997). Therefore, the scales assess different theoretical constructs, but higher order constructs related to positive control expectancies (e.g. optimism) were obtained by calculating composite scores.

The WHOQOL-BRIEF version (The WHOQOL Group, 1998; Lucas-Carrasco, Reference Lucas-Carrasco2012) intended to produce a profile with four domain scores: physical health (seven items), psychological health (six items), social relationships (four items), and environment (eight items), plus two unscored questions about overall QoL and satisfaction with health. Participants rate how they felt in the domains over the last two weeks on a five-point scale. Domain scores are calculated by multiplying the mean of all the items included within the domain by four. Potential scores for each domain score, therefore, range from 4to 20. Higher scores indicate higher QoL.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences application, version 21.0 for Mac. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of groups were expressed as means (M) and standard deviation (SD). Caregivers with scores above the median (Mdn = 78) in the sum of the perceived personal control subscales (self-efficacy, contingency, and success) were categorized as optimistic caregivers (50.8% of the sample), whereas those with scores below the median value in perceived personal control (49.2% of the sample) were considered as non-optimistic. Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the association between quantitative variables. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test (independent samples) were used to determine significant group differences for quantitative variables. Levene's tests were used to assess the homogeneity of variances for all variables. Only depression and burden scales did not satisfy with this assumption, so corrected p-values (equal variances not assumed) for t-contrast were considered for these factors. Moreover, Mann–Whitney U tests were also conducted to confirm the statistical significance of the parametric approach for these variables. Then, independent multiple regression models were conducted including optimism (main predictive variable) and QoL dimensions as the outcome variables. The inclusion of covariates (enter method) on each model was based on correlation analysis between the target variables and each QoL dimension. Therefore, the characteristics of attributes of caregivers and patients including optimism, age, education (years), and caring time (months), cognitive status (MMSE scores), functional impairment (the Barthel index), time from diagnosis (months), psychopathological symptoms (NPI-Q score), severity of dementia (CDR score), and burden were included as covariates. The significance adopted in the analysis was p < 0.05.

Results

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the sample as a function of caregivers’ level of optimism (optimistic vs. non-optimistic).

Table 1. Characteristics of patients and caregivers as a function of caregivers’ level of optimism (n = 130)

a M/F = frequency for males/females.

b S = spouse; C = child; O = other.

c AD =Alzheimer-type dementia; OD = other dementias.

d Mild dementia = 1; moderate dementia = 2; severe dementia = 3.

* = < 0.01; ** = < 0.001

The groups of caregivers (optimistic vs. non-optimistic) did not differ in age, sex, or years of schooling. However, the percentage of caregivers who were first-degree relatives (spouses or children) was higher (92.03% vs. 69.69%) in the non-optimistic group than in the optimistic one. Second, there were no differences in the characteristics of patients cared for by optimistic versus non-optimistic caregivers, except for the type of dementia. In the optimistic group, 56.06% of the patients had Alzheimer's disease, whereas in the non-optimistic group, this percentage was only 25%. Finally, the optimistic group scored significantly higher than the non-optimistic group in physical, psychological, social, and environmental QoL, and lower in depression, anxiety, and burden. Statistical contrast for depression and burden remained significant using the Mann–Whitney test.

Association between optimism and QoL dimensions

Optimism scores positively correlated with all the QoL dimensions: physical health (r = 0.424, p < 0.001), psychological health (r = 0.554, p < 0.001), social relationships (r = 0.389, p < 0.001), and environment (r = 0.383, p < 0.001).

Patients’ and caregivers’ variables associated with QoL dimensions

Caregivers’ burden showed negative correlations with all the QoL dimensions: physical (r = −0.469, p = 0.001), psychological (r = −0.505, p < 0.001), social (r = −0.472, p < 0.001), and environmental (r = −0.494, p < 0.001). Caregiver's age (r = −0.191, p = 0.029) correlated with physical QoL negatively, whereas caring time showed a positive association with psychological QoL (r = 0.182, p = 0.038). Patients’ educational level was positively associated with caregivers’ social (r = 0.195, p = 0.026) and environmental QoL (r = 0.187, p = 0.033). Finally, greater dependence (r = 0.213, p = 0.015) and a longer period of time from diagnostic (r = −0.023, p = 0.023) were also associated with caregivers’ lower scores in environmental QoL.

Prediction of QoL dimensions

Table 2 includes multiple regression models using each dimension of QoL as outcome, and optimism as main predictor. Caregivers’ age, years of education, time of care, burden, and PWD's characteristics (independence, cognitive status, functional impairment, psychological and behavioral symptoms, time from diagnosis, and severity of dementia) were considered as covariates in all models. Optimism remained the best predictor of every dimension of QoL, even after controlling for the effect of all covariates.

Table 2. Regression models for quality of life domains as outcome measures (n = 130)

Discussion

In this study, we showed that optimism is a significant predictor of QoL among informal caregivers, after controlling for the effect of different covariates. This prediction remained significant for all dimensions, even when burden was considered in all models. Therefore, optimism, defined by the combination of three GECs (contingency, self-efficacy, and success), is a relevant construct for predicting QoL dimensions among informal caregivers. This finding is consistent with previous studies that show the importance of psychological resources for caring of PWD (Márquez-González et al., Reference Márquez-González, Losada, Peñacoba and Romero-Moreno2009; Mausbach et al., Reference Mausbach2012; Carver and Scheier, Reference Carver and Scheier2014). Therefore, optimism may protect caregivers from the effects of anger on their physical health (López et al., Reference López, Romero-Moreno, Marquez-Gonzalez and Losada2013), burden (Contador et al., Reference Contador, Fernández-Calvo, Palenzuela, Miguéis and Ramos2012), or even suicide ideation (O'Dwyer et al., Reference O'Dwyer, Moyle, Zimmer-Gembeck and De Leo2013).

In this research, optimism predicted QoL in informal caregivers beyond burden and other clinical and sociodemographic variables, such as neuropsychiatric and behavioral symptoms or level of daily functioning, which traditionally have drawn more attention from researchers (Shin et al., Reference Shin, Carter, Masterman, Fairbanks and Cummings2005; Pinquart and Sörensen, Reference Pinquart and Sörensen2007). Optimistic expectancies, such as internal control, self-efficacy, and success, may encourage caregivers to engage in more effective coping skills. Thus, optimism may explain differences in the adaptation to this stressful situation by mitigating the negative consequences of caring for a PWD (Menezes de Lucena et al., Reference Menezes de Lucena, Fernández-Calvo, Hernández, Ramos and Contador-Castillo2006).

It seems that non-first-degree relatives were more prevalent in the optimistic group. Potentially, caring for PWD under this condition may be assumed more voluntary, whereas first-degree relatives experience more sense of responsibility or feel trapped by a family caregiving role (Pearlin et al., Reference Pearlin, Aneshensel and LeBlanc1997; Archbold, Reference Archbold1983). Moreover, the influence of sociocultural factors (e.g. cohabitation arrangements or rotation) should also be taken into account to explain this relationship (Rivera et al., Reference Rivera, Bermejo, Franco, Morales-González and Benito-León2009). Regarding differences in type of dementia, most optimistic caregivers deal with AD patients compared to less optimistic ones. More information and resources on AD, currently the most prevalent and researched type of dementia, are probably available compared to other dementias, which implies more control to deal with the caring situation (National Institute on Aging, 2018).

This study may contribute to understanding the positive role of optimism in QoL of informal caregivers, who have been reported to project part of their own QoL onto PWD (Arons et al., Reference Arons, Krabbe, Schölzel-Dorenbos, van der Wilt and Older Rikkert2013). This result supports the need to shift from a patient-focused approach to a combined patient- and caregiver-focused approach for interventions in dementia care. Interventions aiming to improve the QoL of informal caregivers of PWD should consider maximizing caregiver's psychological resources, such as optimism, fostering a subjective appraisal of control over one's life, especially in the presence of chronic conditions that involve dealing with stressors like fatigue or pain (Kurtz et al., Reference Kurtz, Kurtz, Given and Given2008). The ability of the informal caregiver to recognize the importance of caring for oneself is essential for themselves and quality of caring received by the PWD.

Our findings highlight the importance of optimism for QoL in family caregivers of PWD beyond subjective (burden) and objective stressors (behavioral disturbances). Hence, Pearlin et al. (Reference Pearlin, Mullan, Semple and Skaff1990) emphasized the effect of intrapsychic variables (e.g. sense of competence) as mediators on the relationship between the stressors (objective and subjective) and negative outcomes related to physical or psychological health of caregiving. Considering that optimism prevents subjective overload of family caregivers (Contador et al., Reference Contador, Fernández-Calvo, Palenzuela, Miguéis and Ramos2012), this research suggests that optimism has a moderator effect on the inverse relationship between burden and QoL of family caregivers. The small sample size and sociocultural differences should be considered as potential limitations before generalizing these findings to the whole caregivers’ population.

Finally, these results encourage the use of non-pharmacological interventions approaches based on GEC to improve the QoL of PWD caregivers. In fact, this research may help to understand the needs of informal caregivers and contribute to improve their QoL, supporting new intervention strategies based on GEC. Although prevention and reduction of burden is a key element of some interventions programs aimed to support family caregivers of PWD (Parker et al., Reference Parker, Mills and Abbey2008), the importance of GEC and related coping strategies to prevent the negative effect of stress on family caregivers has been ignored (Chien et al., Reference Chien2011). Therefore, interventions that foster optimism in caregivers of PWD would improve their QoL. Future research should further explore the relationship between optimism and health outcomes in order to optimize the care and management of PWD. Positive appraisals of the challenges of dementia-caregiving emerge as powerful psychological resources to enhance greater mental and physical health in informal caregivers.

Conflict of interest

None.

Description of authors’ roles

P. Ruisoto was responsible for the statistical design of the study, carrying out the statistical analysis, and writing the paper. I. Contador designed the study, collected the data, and wrote the paper. B. Fernández-Calvo formulated the research questions and designed the study. Finally, D. Palenzuela and F. Ramos supervised the data collection, statistical analysis, and writing the final draft of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Velum Foundation and the Association of Family Members of Patients with Alzheimer's (AFA, Salamanca) for their collaboration in this study.

References

Archbold, P. G. (1983). Impact of parent-caring on women. Family Relations, 32, 3945.Google Scholar
Arons, A. M. M., Krabbe, P. F., Schölzel-Dorenbos, C. J., van der Wilt, G. J. and Older Rikkert, M. G. (2013). Quality of life in dementia: a study on proxy bias. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 110.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. and Scheier, M. F. (2014). Dispositional optimism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 293299.Google Scholar
Chien, L. Y. et al. (2011). Caregiver support groups in patients with dementia: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26, 10891098.Google Scholar
Contador, I. et al. (2015). A control-based multidimensional approach to the role of optimism in the use of dementia day care services. American Journal of Alzheimer´s Disease and Other Dementia, 30, 686693.Google Scholar
Contador, I., Fernández-Calvo, B., Palenzuela, D. L., Miguéis, S. and Ramos, F. (2012). Prediction of burden in family caregivers of patients with dementia: a perspective of optimism based on generalized expectancies of control. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 675682.Google Scholar
Etters, L., Goodall, D. and Harrison, B. E. (2008). Caregiver burden among dementia patient caregivers: a review of the literature. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 20, 423428.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-Mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.Google Scholar
Giltay, E. J., Geleijnse, J. M., Zitman, F. G., Hoekstra, T. and Schouten, E. G. (2004). Dispositional optimism and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a prospective cohort of elderly Dutch men and women. Archives in General Psychiatry, 61, 11261135.Google Scholar
Glaser, R. and Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2005). Stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health. Nature Reviews Immunology, 5, 243.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D., Bridges, K., Duncan-Jones, P. and Grayson, D. (1988). Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. British Medical Journal, 297, 897899.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W. L., Coben, L. A. and Martin, R. L. (1982). A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 566572.Google Scholar
Kaufer, D. I. et al. (2000). Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 12, 233239.Google Scholar
Kemeny, M. E. and Schedlowski, M. (2007). Understanding the interaction between psychosocial stress and immune-related diseases: a stepwise progression. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 21, 10091018.Google Scholar
Kurtz, M. E., Kurtz, J. C., Given, C. W. and Given, B. A. (2008). Patient optimism and mastery—do they play a role in cancer patients' management of pain and fatigue? Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 36, 110.Google Scholar
López, J., Romero-Moreno, R., Marquez-Gonzalez, M. and Losada, A. (2013). Anger and health in dementia caregivers: exploring the mediation effect of optimism. Stress Health, 31, 158165.Google Scholar
Lucas-Carrasco, R. (2012). The WHO quality of life (WHQOL) questionnaire: Spanish development and validation studies. Quality of Life Research, 21, 161165.Google Scholar
Mahoney, F. I. and Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 6165.Google Scholar
Márquez-González, M., Losada, A., Peñacoba, C. and Romero-Moreno, R. (2009). Optimismo como moderador de la relación entre el estrés y la depresión de los familiares cuidadores de personas mayores dependientes [Optimism as a moderator in the relationship between stress appraisals and depression in family caregivers of frail elderly people]. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 444, 251255.Google Scholar
Mausbach, B. T. et al. (2012). Multiple mediators of the relations between caregiving stress and depressive symptoms. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 2738.Google Scholar
Menezes de Lucena, V., Fernández-Calvo, B., Hernández, L., Ramos, F. and Contador-Castillo, I. (2006). Resiliencia y el modelo Burnout: engagement en cuidadores formales de ancianos [Resilience and the burnout-engagement model in formal caregivers of the elderly]. Psicothema, 18, 791796.Google Scholar
National Institute on Aging (NIA) (2018). Stopping Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Advancing Our Nation's Research Agenda. Available at: https://www.nia.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2017-07/fy2018-bypass-budget-main-report-508; last accessed 30 April 2018.Google Scholar
O'Dwyer, S. T., Moyle, W., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. and De Leo, D. (2013). Suicidal ideation in family carers of people with dementia: a pilot study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28, 11821188.Google Scholar
Ory, M. G., Hoffman, R. R., Yee, J. L., Tennstedt, S. and Schulz, R. (1990). Prevalence and impact of caregiving: a detailed comparison between dementia and non-dementia caregivers. The Gerontologist, 39, 177185.Google Scholar
Palenzuela, D. L. (2008). A new perspective of generalized expectancies of control: grounded optimism, ungrounded optimism and fatalism. Paper presented at the VII International Congress of the Spanish Society for the Anxiety and Stress Research, Benidorm, Spain.Google Scholar
Palenzuela, D. L., Prieto, G., Barros, A. M. and Almeida, L. S. (1997). Spanish version of a Battery of Generalized Expectancies of Control scales (BEEGC). Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 10, 7596.Google Scholar
Parker, D., Mills, S. and Abbey, J. (2008). Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 6, 137172.Google Scholar
Pearlin, L. I., Aneshensel, C. S. and LeBlanc, A. J. (1997). The forms and mechanisms of stress proliferation: the case of AIDS caregivers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 223236.Google Scholar
Pearlin, L. I., Mullan, J. T., Semple, S. J. and Skaff, M. M. (1990). Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist, 30, 583594.Google Scholar
Pinquart, M. and Sörensen, S. (2007). Correlates of physical health of informal caregivers: a meta-analysis. Journal of Gerontology, Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62, 126137.Google Scholar
Prince, M., Ali, G. C., Guerche, T. M., Prina, A. M., Albanese, E. and Wu, Y. T. (2016). Recent global trends in the prevalence and incidence of dementia, and survival with dementia. Alzheimer´s Research & Therapy, 8, 123.Google Scholar
Raggi, A., Tasca, D., Panerai, S., Neri, W. and Ferri, R. (2015). The burden of distress and related coping processes in family caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease living in the community. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 358, 7781.Google Scholar
Rivera, J., Bermejo, F., Franco, M., Morales-González, J. M. and Benito-León, J. (2009). Understanding care of people with dementia in Spain: cohabitation arrangements, rotation and rejection to long term care institution. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 142148.Google Scholar
Roepke, S. K. et al. (2008). Personal mastery is associated with reduced sympathetic arousal in stressed Alzheimer caregivers. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 310317.Google Scholar
Shin, I. S., Carter, M., Masterman, D., Fairbanks, L. and Cummings, J. L. (2005). Neuropsychiatric symptoms and quality of life in Alzheimer disease. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13, 469474.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. M. et al. (2015). Dementia caregivers’ coping strategies and their relationship to health and well-being: the cache county study. Aging & Mental Health, 19, 390399.Google Scholar
The WHOQOL Group (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BRIEF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551558.Google Scholar
The WHOQOL Group (2008). Development of the WHOQOL: rationale and current status. International Journal of Mental Health, 23, 2456.Google Scholar
Zarit, S. H., Todd, P. A. and Zarit, J. M. (1986). Subjective burden of husbands and wives as caregivers: a longitudinal study. The Gerontologist, 26, 260266.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of patients and caregivers as a function of caregivers’ level of optimism (n = 130)

Figure 1

Table 2. Regression models for quality of life domains as outcome measures (n = 130)