Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Preferences regarding disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia: a systematic review

  • Pim van den Dungen (a1), Lisa van Kuijk (a1), Harm van Marwijk (a1), Johannes van der Wouden (a1), Eric Moll van Charante (a2), Henriette van der Horst (a1) and Hein van Hout (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract Background:

Studies in memory clinics suggest that the majority of patients would like to know of a diagnosis of dementia. It is less clear what preferences are in the community. Our objective was to review the literature on preferences regarding disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia and to assess key arguments in favor of and against disclosure.

Methods:

Systematic search of empirical studies was performed in Pubmed, Embase, and Psycinfo. We extracted preferences of individuals without cognitive impairment (general population; relatives of dementia patients; and physicians) and preferences of individuals referred to a memory clinic or already diagnosed with dementia. A meta-analysis was done using a random effects model. Our main conclusions are based on studies with a response rate ≥75%.

Results:

We included 23 articles (9.065 respondents). In studies with individuals without cognitive impairment, the pooled percentage in favor of disclosure was 90.7% (95%CI: 83.8%–97.5%). In studies with patients who were referred to a memory clinic or already diagnosed with dementia, the pooled percentage that considered disclosure favorable was 84.8% (95%CI: 75.6%–94.0%). The central arguments in favor of disclosure pertained to autonomy and the possibility to plan one's future. Arguments against disclosure were fear of getting upset and that knowing has no use.

Conclusions:

The vast majority of individuals without and with cognitive impairment prefers to be informed about a diagnosis of dementia for reasons pertaining to autonomy.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence should be addressed to: Pim van den Dungen, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Phone: +31-20-4448199, Fax +31-20-4448361. Email: p.vandendungen@vumc.nl.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

F. Aminzadeh , A. Byszewski , F. J. Molnar and M. Eisner (2007). Emotional impact of dementia diagnosis: exploring persons with dementia and caregivers’ perspectives. Aging and Mental Health, 11, 281290.

A. M. Byszewski , F. J. Molnar , F. Aminzadeh , M. Eisner , F. Gardezi and R. Bassett (2007). Dementia diagnosis disclosure: a study of patient and caregiver perspectives. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders., 21, 107114.

S. Cahill , M. Clark , C. Walsh , H. O’Connell and B. Lawlor (2006). Dementia in primary care: the first survey of Irish general practitioners. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 319324.

C. Cooper , P. Bebbington and G. Livingston (2011). Cognitive impairment and happiness in old people in low and middle income countries: results from the 10/66 study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 130, 198204.

R. DerSimonian and N. Laird (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7, 177188.

M. P. Eccles , R. Foy , C. Bamford , J. Lecouturier , N. Steen and P. M. Whitty (2009). Improving professional practice in the disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia: a modeling experiment to evaluate a theory-based intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 377387.

P. Elson (2006). Do older adults presenting with memory complaints wish to be told if later diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 419425.

R. Foy et al. (2007a). Which factors explain variation in intention to disclose a diagnosis of dementia? A theory-based survey of mental health professionals. Implementation Science, 2, 31.

J. E. Galvin and C. H. Sadowsky (2012). Practical guidelines for the recognition and diagnosis of dementia. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 25, 367382.

H. C. Heal and H. J. Husband (1998). Disclosing a diagnosis of dementia: is age a factor? Aging and Mental Health, 2, 144150.

S. Holroyd , D. G. Snustad and Z. L. Chalifoux (1996). Attitudes of older adults’ on being told the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44, 400403.

H. P. Hout, van , M. J. Vernooij-Dassen , D. A. Jansen and W. A. Stalman (2006). Do general practitioners disclose correct information to their patients suspected of dementia and their caregivers? A prospective observational study. Aging and Mental Health, 10, 151155.

H. P. Hout, van , M. Vernooij-Dassen , K. Bakker , M. Blom and R. Grol (2000). General practitioners on dementia: tasks, practices and obstacles. Patient Education and Counseling, 39, 219225.

S. Iliffe et al. (2009). Primary care and dementia: 1. diagnosis, screening and disclosure. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 895901.

A. Jha , N. Tabet and M. Orrell (2001). To tell or not to tell-comparison of older patients’ reaction to their diagnosis of dementia and depression. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 879885.

T. Koch and S. Iliffe (2010). Rapid appraisal of barriers to the diagnosis and management of patients with dementia in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Family Practice, 11 52.

M. Kutzleben, von , W. Schmid , M. Halek , B. Holle and S. Bartholomeyczik (2012). Community-dwelling persons with dementia: what do they need? What do they demand? What do they do? A systematic review on the subjective experiences of persons with dementia. Aging and Mental Health, 16, 378390.

M. Marzanski (2000). Would you like to know what is wrong with you? On telling the truth to patients with dementia. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26, 108113.

E. Mormont , F. K. de and J. Jamart (2012). Experiences of the patients and their caregivers regarding the disclosure of the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a Belgian retrospective survey. Acta Neurologica Belgica, 112, 249254.

J. Phillips et al. (2012). Difficulties in disclosing the diagnosis of dementia: a qualitative study in general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 62, 546553.

F. Segal-Gidan , D. Cherry , R. Jones , B. Williams , L. Hewett and J. Chodosh (2011). Alzheimer's disease management guideline: update 2008. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 7, e5159.

L. S. Seyfried , H. C. Kales , R. V. Ignacio , Y. Conwell , and M. Valenstein (2011). Predictors of suicide in patients with dementia. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 7, 567573.

M. M. Shimizu , I. Raicher , D. Y. Takahashi , P. Caramelli and R. Nitrini (2008). Disclosure of the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: caregivers’ opinions in a Brazilian sample. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 66, 625630.

K. Sullivan and F. O’Conor (2001). Should a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease be disclosed? Aging and Mental Health, 5, 340348.

M. E. Tarek , K. Segers and N. C. Van (2009). What belgian neurologists and neuropsychiatrists tell their patients with Alzheimer disease and why: a national survey. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 23, 3337.

J. M. Vroomen , J. E. Bosmans , H. P. van Hout , and S. E. de Rooij (2013). Reviewing the definition of crisis in dementia care. BMC Geriatrics, 13, 10.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Psychogeriatrics
  • ISSN: 1041-6102
  • EISSN: 1741-203X
  • URL: /core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

van den Dungen Supplementary Material
Appendix 1

 Word (30 KB)
30 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

van den Dungen Supplementary Material
Appendix 2

 Word (27 KB)
27 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 57 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 329 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.