Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Kantian nonideal theory and nuclear proliferation

  • Thomas E. Doyle (a1)
Abstract

Recent revelations of Iran’s hitherto undisclosed uranium enrichment programs have once again incited western fears that Tehran seeks nuclear weapons’ capability. Their fears seem motivated by more than the concern for compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). Rather, they seem strongly connected to the western moral assumptions about what kind of government or people can be trusted with a nuclear arsenal. In this paper, I critically examine the western assumptions of the immorality of contemporary nuclear proliferation from an international ethical stance that otherwise might be expected to give it unequivocal support – the stance of Kantian nonideal theory. In contrast to the uses of Kant that were prominent during the Cold War, I advance and apply a sketch of a Kantian nonideal theory that specifies the conditions (although strict conditions) under which nuclear proliferation for states like Iran is morally permissible even though the NPT forbids it.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* E-mail: tdoyle@uci.edu
References
Hide All
Ansari, A.M. (2006), Confronting Iran: The Failure of American Foreign Policy and the Next Great Conflict in the Middle East, New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.
Bakanic, E.D. (2008), ‘The End of Japan’s Nuclear Taboo’. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, retrieved 06/09/2008 from http://www.thebulletin.org/node/3105
Bederman, D.J. (2006), International Law Frameworks, 2nd edn., New York, NY, USA: Thomson West.
Beitz, C.R. [1979] (1999), Political Theory and International Relations, with a New Afterword by the Author, Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Booth, K. (2007), Theory of World Security, Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bull, H. (1977), Anarchical Society, London, UK: Macmillan.
Bunn, G. (2006), ‘The nuclear nonproliferation regime and its history’, in G. Bunn and C.F. Chyba (eds), US Nuclear Weapons Policy: Confronting Today’s Threats, Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution Press.
Campbell, K.M., Einhorn, R.J.Reiss, M.B. (eds) (2004), The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices, Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institute Press.
Churchill, R.P. (1983), ‘Nuclear arms as a philosophical and moral issue’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 469: 4657.
Chyba, C.F., Braun, C.Bunn, G. (2006), ‘New challenges to the nonproliferation regime’, in G. Bunn and C.F. Chyba (eds), US Nuclear Weapons Policy: Confronting Today’s Threats, Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution Press.
Donaldson, T. (1985), ‘Nuclear deterrence and self defense’, Ethics 95(3): 537548.
Doyle, T.E. (2009a), ‘Moral dilemmas: acquiring nuclear weapons in the second nuclear age’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Irvine.
Doyle, T.E. (2009b), ‘The moral implications of the subversion of the nonproliferation treaty regime’, Ethics and Global Politics 2(2): 131154.
Einhorn, R.J. (2004), ‘Will the abstainers reconsider? Focusing on individual cases’, in K.M. Campbell, R.J. Einhorn and M.B. Reiss (eds), The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices, Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution Press.
Fuerth, L. (2004), ‘Turkey: nuclear choices amongst dangerous neighbors’, in K.M. Campbell, R.J. Einhorn, and M.B. Reiss (eds), The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices, Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution Press.
Gauthier, D. (1984), ‘Deterrence, maximization, and rationality’, Ethics 94(3): 474495.
Hashmi, S.H.Lee, S.P. (eds) (2004), Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, T. [1651] (1968), Leviathan. Ed and introd by C. B. Macpherson. Baltimore, Md, USA: Penguin.
Hoffe, O. (2006), Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace, Alexandra Newton. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hymans, J.E.C. (2006), The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1785), ‘Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals’, in M.J. Gregor (ed.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1793), ‘Religion within the boundaries of mere reason’, in A.W. Wood and G.D. Giovanni (eds), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–216.
Kant, I. (1795), ‘Towards perpetual peace’, in M.J. Gregor (ed.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–352.
Kant, I. (1797a), ‘The metaphysics of morals’, in M.J. Gregor (ed.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 353–604.
Kant, I. (1797b), ‘On a supposed right to lie from philanthropy’, in trans. M.J. Gregor and A. Wood (eds), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I.Infield, Louis trans. (1963), Lectures on Ethics, New York and Evanston: Harper & Row, Publishers, p.157.
Kavka, G.S. (1978), ‘Some paradoxes of deterrence’, Journal of Philosophy 75(6): 285302.
Kavka, G.S. (1983), ‘Doubts about unilateral disarmament’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 12(3): 255260.
Kavka, G.S. (1986), Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory, Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. pp. 349–358.
Korsgaard, C. (1996), Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lebow, R.N. (2003), The Tragic View of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, S.P. (1985), ‘The morality of nuclear deterrence: hostage holding and consequences’, Ethics 95(4): 549566.
McMahan, J. (1985), ‘Deterrence and deontology’, Ethics 95(3): 517536.
Nasr, V. (2007), The Shia Revival: How Conflicts Within Islam Will Shape the Future. With a New Afterword, New York, USA: W. W. Norton & Company.
Nell, O. (1975), Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics, New York, USA: Columbia University Press.
Nye, J.S. (1986), Nuclear Ethics, New York, USA: The Free Press.
Orend, B. (2000), War and International Justice: a Kantian Perspective, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Price, R.M. (1997), The Chemical Weapons Taboo, Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
Quester, G. (2006), Nuclear First Strike: Consequences of a Broken Taboo, Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ramsey, R.P. (1962), ‘The case for making “Just War” possible’, in J.C. Bennett (ed.), Nuclear Weapons and the Conflict of Conscience, New York, NY, USA: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, rev. edn., Cambridge MA, USA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999), The Law of Peoples, Cambridge MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Sagan, S.D. (2004), ‘Realist perspectives on ethical norms and weapons of mass destruction’, in S. H. Hashmi and S. P. Lee (eds), Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Secular and Religious Perspectives, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sanger, D.E. (2009), ‘Iran threatens to back out in fuel deal’, New York Times, 20 October, A6.
Schapiro, T. (2003), ‘Compliance, complicity, and the nature of nonideal conditions’, The Journal of Philosophy C(7): 329355.
Slackman, M. (2009), ‘Iran will not ship Uranium abroad, foreign minister says’, New York Times. 19 November, A14.
Smith, D.D. (2006), Deterring America: Rogue States and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Cambridge, UK, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Swift, A. (2007), ‘The value of philosophy in non-ideal circumstances’. Seminar in Political Theory. University College London, 14 November. Retreived 26 March 2009 from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/seminars/pt
Tertrais, B. (2003), ‘The New Dynamics of Nuclear Proliferation’, CEPS/IISS European Security Forum. Brussels, 3 March 2003.
Tucker, R.W. (1985), ‘Morality and deterrence’, Ethics 95(3): 461478.
Walzer, M. [1977] (2000), Just and Unjust Wars: a Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations, 3rd edn., New York, USA: Basic.
Way, C. (2007), ‘Understanding nuclear weapons proliferation’. Institute for Global Conflict and Cooperation: Public Policy and Nuclear Threats. University of California, San Diego. Retrieved 17 July 2007 from http://igcc.ucsd.edu/PPNT.php
Wendt, A. (1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 283–285.
Williams, M.C. (2005), The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Theory
  • ISSN: 1752-9719
  • EISSN: 1752-9727
  • URL: /core/journals/international-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed