Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Kantian nonideal theory and nuclear proliferation

  • Thomas E. Doyle (a1)

Recent revelations of Iran’s hitherto undisclosed uranium enrichment programs have once again incited western fears that Tehran seeks nuclear weapons’ capability. Their fears seem motivated by more than the concern for compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). Rather, they seem strongly connected to the western moral assumptions about what kind of government or people can be trusted with a nuclear arsenal. In this paper, I critically examine the western assumptions of the immorality of contemporary nuclear proliferation from an international ethical stance that otherwise might be expected to give it unequivocal support – the stance of Kantian nonideal theory. In contrast to the uses of Kant that were prominent during the Cold War, I advance and apply a sketch of a Kantian nonideal theory that specifies the conditions (although strict conditions) under which nuclear proliferation for states like Iran is morally permissible even though the NPT forbids it.

Corresponding author
* E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D.J. Bederman (2006), International Law Frameworks, 2nd edn., New York, NY, USA: Thomson West.

H. Bull (1977), Anarchical Society, London, UK: Macmillan.

R.P. Churchill (1983), ‘Nuclear arms as a philosophical and moral issue’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 469: 4657.

T. Donaldson (1985), ‘Nuclear deterrence and self defense’, Ethics 95(3): 537548.

T.E. Doyle (2009b), ‘The moral implications of the subversion of the nonproliferation treaty regime’, Ethics and Global Politics 2(2): 131154.

D. Gauthier (1984), ‘Deterrence, maximization, and rationality’, Ethics 94(3): 474495.

G.S. Kavka (1978), ‘Some paradoxes of deterrence’, Journal of Philosophy 75(6): 285302.

S.P. Lee (1985), ‘The morality of nuclear deterrence: hostage holding and consequences’, Ethics 95(4): 549566.

J. McMahan (1985), ‘Deterrence and deontology’, Ethics 95(3): 517536.

S.D. Sagan (2004), ‘Realist perspectives on ethical norms and weapons of mass destruction’, in S. H. Hashmi and S. P. Lee (eds), Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Secular and Religious Perspectives, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

R.W. Tucker (1985), ‘Morality and deterrence’, Ethics 95(3): 461478.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Theory
  • ISSN: 1752-9719
  • EISSN: 1752-9727
  • URL: /core/journals/international-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 26 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 451 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.