Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T21:22:36.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Realism and international law: the challenge of John H. Herz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2010

Casper Sylvest
Casper Sylvest*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Public Management, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
*
E-mail: csy@sam.sdu.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The proliferation, globalization, and fragmentation of law in world politics have fostered an attempt to re-integrate International Law (IL) and International Relations (IR) scholarship, but so far the contribution of realist theory to this interdisciplinary perspective has been meagre. Combining intellectual history, the jurisprudence of IL and IR theory, this article provides an analysis of John H. Herz’s classical realism and its perspective on international law. In retrieving this vision, the article emphasizes the political and intellectual context from which Herz’s realism developed: the study of public law in Germany during the interwar period and in particular the contribution of Hans Kelsen and the pure theory of law to the study of international law. Herz was deeply inspired by Kelsen but he criticized the pure theory for ignoring the sociological foundations of law. Following his emigration to the United States, Herz embraced realism but without disregarding international law. Indeed, his mature, globally oriented realism offers a balanced, fruitful perspective for thinking about the relationship between politics and law that is deeply relevant for contemporary theory: it challenges modern, law-blind variants of realism and holds considerable potential for contributing to the approaches that have most successfully studied the law–politics nexus.

Keywords

realismIR theoryinternational lawJohn H. HerzHans Kelsenthe pure theory of law
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 410 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K.W. (2005), ‘Toward a richer institutionalism for international law and policy’, Journal of Law and International Relations 1: 9–34.Google Scholar
Abbott, K.W.Snidal, D. (2000), ‘Hard and soft law in international governance’, International Organization 54: 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D., Farrell, T.Lambert, H. (2008), International Law and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ashley, R.K. (1984), ‘The poverty of neorealism’, International Organization 38: 225–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkawi, T. (1998), ‘Strategy as a vocation: Weber, Morgenthau and modern strategic studies’, Review of International Studies 24: 159–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, C.J. (2004), International Law and International Relations, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Barkin, S. (2010), Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, R.J. (2009), ‘International law and international relations scholarship’, in D. Armstrong (ed.), Routledge Handbook of International Law, London: Routledge, pp. 13–43.Google Scholar
Berman, P.S. (2006), ‘Seeing beyond the limits of international law’, Texas Law Review 84: 1265–1306.Google Scholar
von Bernstorff, J. (2001), Die Glaube an das universale Recht: Zur Völkerrechtstheorie Hans Kelsens und seiner Schüler, Nomos: Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
Booth, K.Wheeler, N. (2008), The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics, Palgrave: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Brewster, R. (2009), ‘The limits of reputation on compliance’, International Theory 1: 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bristler, E. [J.H. Herz] (1938), Die Völkerrechtslehre des Nationalsozialismus, Europa: Zürich.Google Scholar
Bull, H. (1986), ‘Hans Kelsen and international law’, in R. Tur and W. Twining (eds), Essays on Kelsen, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 321–336.Google Scholar
Byers, M. (2008), ‘International law’, in D. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 612–631.Google Scholar
Cali, B. (ed.) (2010), International Law for International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, E.H. (1946, 1939), The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939, 2nd edn, New York: Harper Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, G.Herz, J.H. (1973), Government and Politics in the Twentieth Century, 3rd edn., New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Carty, A. (2008), ‘Sociological theories of international law’, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford: Oxford University press Online edn, Retrieved 18 March 2010 from www.mpepil.comGoogle Scholar
Europäische Ideen (1978), ‘John H. Herz zum 70. Geburtstag’ 41 (special issue).Google Scholar
Finnemore, M. (2006), ‘New directions, new collaborations for international law and international relations’, in T. Biersteker, et al. (eds), International Law and International Relations: Bridging Theory and Practice, New York: Routledge, pp. 266–277.Google Scholar
Florin, J.Herz, J.H. (1940), ‘Bolshevist and national socialist doctrines of international law: a case study of the function of social science in the totalitarian dictatorships’, Social Research 7: 1–31.Google Scholar
Frei, C. (2001), Hans J. Morgenthau: An Intellectual Biography, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Garth, B.G. (2008), ‘The globalization of law’, in K.E. Whittington, R.D. Kelemen and G.A. Caldeira (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 245–264.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J.L.Posner, E.A. (2005), The Limits of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J.Martin, L.L. (2000), ‘Legalization, trade liberalization and domestic politics: a cautionary note’, International Organization 54: 603–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R.O.Slaughter, A.-M. (eds) (2000), Legalization and World Politics, International Organization (special issue) 54(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gott, V.L. (1938), ‘The national socialist theory of international law’, American Journal of International Law 32: 704–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilthot, N. (2010), ‘American Katechon: when political theology became International Relations theory’, Constellations 17: 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, J. (1993), The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Guzman, A.T. (2008), How International Law Works, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A.T. (2009a), ‘How international law works: introduction’, International Theory 1: 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A.T. (2009b), ‘How international law works: a response to commentators’, International Theory 1: 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacke, C.Puglierin, J. (2007), ‘John H. Herz: balancing utopia and reality’, International Relations 21: 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, N. (1933), Das Problem des Geistiges Seins: Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der Geschichtsphilosophie unter der Geisteswissenschaften, Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, O.A.Lavinbuk, A.N. (2006), ‘Rationalism and revisionism in international law’, Harvard Law Review 119: 1404–1443.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1991), Elements of the Philosophy of Right (translated by H.B. Nisbet), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, H. [J.H.] (1931), Die Identität des Staates, Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde, Universität zu Köln, Düsseldorf: H. Ohligschläger.Google Scholar
Herz, H. [J.H.] (1935a), ‘Beiträge zum Problem der Identität des Staates’, Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 15: 241–268.Google Scholar
Herz, H. [J.H.] (1935b), ‘Das Recht im Stufenbau der Seinsschichten’, Revue internationale de la théorie du droit/Internationale Zeitschrift für Theorie des Rechts 9: 283–294.Google Scholar
Herz, H. [J.H.] (1936), ‘Eine neue Wendung in der Meerengenfrage’, Die Friedens-Warte 36: 137–147.Google Scholar
Herz, H. [J.H.] (1937a), ‘Recht und Realdialektik’, Revue internationale de la théorie du droit/Internationale Zeitschrift für Theorie des Rechts 11: 1–11.Google Scholar
Herz, H. [J.H.] (1937b), ‘Das Meerengenstatut von Montreux: Seine völkerrechtliche und politische Tragweite’, Die Friedens-Warte 37: 126–144, 153–159.Google Scholar
Herz, H. [J.H.] (1939), ‘Einige Bemerkungen zur Grundlegung des Völkerrechts’, Revue internationale de la théorie du droit/Internationale Zeitschrift für Theorie des Rechts 13: 275–300.Google Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1939), ‘The national socialist doctrine of international law and problems of international organization’, Political Science Quarterly 54: 536–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1941), ‘Expropriation of alien property: an inquiry into the sociology of international law’, Social Research 8: 63–78.Google Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1942), ‘Power politics and world organization’, American Political Science Review 36: 1039–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1951), Political Realism and Political Idealism: A Study in Theories and Realities, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1959), International Politics in the Atomic Age, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1964), ‘The pure theory of law revisited: Hans Kelsen’s doctrine of international law in the nuclear age’, in S. Engel (ed.), Law, State and International Legal Order, Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, pp. 107–118.Google Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1975), ‘Carl Schmitt’, Intellect, May/June, 283–285.Google Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1976), The Nation-State and the Crisis of World Politics: Essays on International Politics in the Twentieth Century, New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1980), ‘Weltbild und Bewusstwerdung – vernachlässigte Faktoren beim Studium der Internationalen Beziehungen’, Aus Politik und Zeit Geschichte. Beilage zur Wochen Zeitung des Parlament 11: 3–17.Google Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1981), ‘Political realism revisited’, International Studies Quarterly 25: 182–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1982), ‘Foreign policy and human survival’, in G. Schwab (ed.), United States Foreign Policy at the Crossroads, Westport: Greenwood Press, pp. 165–193.Google Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1984a), Vom Überleben: Wie ein Weltbild entstand, Düsseldorf: Droste.Google Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1984b), ‘Reflections on Hans Morgenthau’s political realism’, American Foreign Policy Newsletter 7(February): 1, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, J.H. (1992), ‘Looking at Carl Schmitt from the vantage point of the 1990s’, Interpretation 19: 307–314.Google Scholar
Herz, J.H. (2003), ‘The security dilemma in international relations: background and present problems’, International Relations 17: 411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueck, I. (2004), ‘Peace, security and international organisations: the German international lawyers and the Hague Conferences’, in R. Lesaffer (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the late Middle Ages to World War One, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Relations (2008), ‘Special issue commemorating the centenary of the birth of John H. Herz’, K. Booth and J. Puglierin (eds), 22(4).Google Scholar
John H. Herz Papers, German and Jewish Émigré Collection, M.E. Grenander Department of Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, State University of New York [The papers are uncatalogued; all references are provisional] (unpublished).Google Scholar
John M. Spalek Collection (GER-106), German and Jewish Émigré Collection, M.E. Grenander Department of Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, State University of New York (unpublished).Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1998), E. H. Carr: A Duty to Lie, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, J.W. (1935), ‘The “pure” theory of international law’, British Yearbook of International Law 16: 5–19.Google Scholar
Jütersonke, O. (2006), ‘Hans J. Morgenthau on the limits of justiciability in international law’, Journal of the History of International Law 8: 181–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jütersonke, O. (2008), ‘The image of law in Politics Among Nations’, in M.C. Williams (ed.), Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–211.Google Scholar
Katznelson, I. (2003), Desolation and Enlightenment: Political Knowledge after Total War, Totalitarianism and the Holocaust, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, P., Sil, R. (2008), ‘Eclectic theorizing in the study and practice of international relations’, in D. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–130.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. (2003), The State of the Political: Conceptions of Politics and the State in the Thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Franz Neumann, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1935), The Legal Process and International Order, London: Constable.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1942), Law and Peace in International Relations, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1981a [1928]), Der soziologische und der juristische Staatsbegriff: Kritische Untersuchung des Verhältnisses von Staat und Recht, 2nd edn, Aalen: Scientia.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1981b [1920,1928]), Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts: Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre, 2nd edn, Aalen: Scientia.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1998a [1923]), ‘ “Foreword” to the second printing of main problems in the theory of public law’, reprinted in S.L. Paulson and B.L. Paulson (eds), Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1998b [1962]), ‘Sovereignty’, reprinted in S.L. Paulson and B.L. Paulson (eds), Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 525–536.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2001), The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, S.D. (2002), ‘Realist views of international law’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society of International Law 96: 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunz, J.L. (1924), ‘On the theoretical basis of the law of nations’, Transactions of the Grotius Society 10: 115–142.Google Scholar
Kunz, J.L. (1968 [1934]), ‘The “Vienna School” and international law [1934]’, in Kunz, The Changing Law of Nations: Essays on International Law, Athens: Ohio University Press, pp. 59–124.Google Scholar
Kydd, A. (2009), ‘Reputation and cooperation: Guzman on international law’, International Theory 1: 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. (2004), A Life of H. L. A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Métall, R. (ed.) (1974), 33 Beiträge zur Reinen Rechtslehre, Vienna: Hans Kelsen-Institut.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H.J. (1940), ‘Positivism, functionalism and international law’, American Journal of International Law 34: 260–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, H.J. (1978 [1951]), Review of Herz, political realism and political idealism (1951), Europaïsche Ideen 41: 70–72.Google Scholar
Oren, I. (2009), ‘The unrealism of contemporary realism: the tension between realist theory and realist practice’, Perspectives on Politics 7: 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, S.L. (1998), ‘Introduction’, in S.L. Paulson and B.L. Paulson (eds), Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. xxiii–liii.Google Scholar
Paulson, S.L. (2005), ‘The theory of public law in Germany, 1914–1945’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25: 525–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E.A. (2009), The Perils of Global Legalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuss, L (1935), ‘National socialist conceptions of international law’, American Political Science Review 29: 594–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, C. (2001), ‘The strange death of liberal international theory’, European Journal of International Law 12: 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, C. (2004), ‘The politics of international law’, in C. Reus-Smit (ed.), The Politics of International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, W.E. (1999), Carl Schmitt: The End of Law, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W.E. (2008), ‘Realism and the left: the case of Morgenthau’, Review of International Studies 34: 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, W.E. (2009a), Hans Morgenthau: Realism and Beyond, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W.E. (2009b), ‘A theoretical missed opportunity? Hans J. Morgenthau as critical realist’, in D. Bell (ed.), Political Thought and International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, W.E. (2009c), ‘Realism and the critique of technology’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22: 563–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieder, S. (2009), ‘Pragmatism and international law’, in H. Bauer and E. Brighi (eds), Pragmatism in International Relations, London: Routledge, pp. 124–142.Google Scholar
Simma, B. (1995), ‘The contribution of Alfred Verdross to the theory of international law’, European Journal of International Law 6: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, B. (2008), ‘International law and international relations’, in K.E. Whittington, R.D. Kelemen and G.A. Caldeira (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M. (1993), ‘International law and international relations theory: a dual agenda’, American Journal of International Law 87: 205–239.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., Tulumello, A.Wood, S. (1998), ‘International law and International Relations theory: a new generation of interdisciplinary scholarship’, American Journal of International Law 92: 367–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, D.Wendt, A. (2009), ‘Why there is International Theory now’, International Theory 1: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söllner, A. (1988), ‘Vom Völkerrecht zur science of International Relations: Vier typische Vertreter der politikwissenschaftlichen Emigration’, in I. Srubar (ed.), Exil, Wissenschaft, Identität: Die Emigration deutscher Sozialwissenschaftler 1933–1945, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 164–180.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, H. (1994), The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction, 3rd edn, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke, J.G. (1998 [1936]), ‘Monism and dualism in the theory of international law’, reprinted in S.L. Paulson and B.L. Paulson (eds), Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 537–552.Google Scholar
Stern, W.B. (1936), ‘Kelsen’s theory of international law’, American Political Science Review 30: 736–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirk, P. (2005), ‘John H. Herz and the fragility of international order’, Review of International Studies 31: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirk, P. (2008), ‘John Herz and the international law of the Third Reich’, International Relations 22: 427–440.Google Scholar
Stolleis, M. (2001), Public Law in Germany 1800–1914, Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Stolleis, M. (2004) [1999]), A History of Public Law in Germany, 1914–1945 (translated by T. Dunlap), Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvest, C. (2008), ‘John H. Herz and the resurrection of classical realism’, International Relations 22: 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thierry, H. (1990), ‘The European tradition in international law: Georges Scelle’, European Journal of International Law 1: 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. (2009), ‘The rational enforcement of international law: solving the sanctioner’s dilemma’, International Theory 1: 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, S.P. (2009), ‘Hans J. Morgenthau and the legacy of Max Weber’, in D. Bell (ed.), Political Thought and International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vagts, D.F. (1990), ‘International Law in the Third Reich’, American Journal of International Law 84: 661–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdross, A. (1914), ‘Zur Konstruktion des Völkerrechts’, Zeitschrift für Völkerrecht 8: 329–359.Google Scholar
Verdross, A. (1923), ‘Völkerrecht und einheitliches Rechtssystem’, Zeitschrift für Völkerrecht 12: 405–438.Google Scholar
Waltz, K.N. (1959), Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1949) [1904]), ‘ “Objectivity” in social science and social policy’, in Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (translated and eds E. Shils and H. Finch), New York: Free Press, pp. 50–112.Google Scholar
Werkmeister, W.H. (1990), Nicolai Hartmann’s New Ontology, Tallahassee: Florida State University Press.Google Scholar
Zolo, D. (1998), ‘Hans Kelsen: international peace through international law’, European Journal of International Law 9: 306–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar