Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:18:42.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is the purpose of international law?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2011

Jeffrey L. Dunoff
Jeffrey L. Dunoff*
Affiliation:
Professor of Law and Director, Institute for International Law & Public Policy, Temple University Beasley School of Law, Philadelphia, PA, USA
*
E-mail: jeffrey.dunoff@temple.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account by Jutta Brunnée and Stephen J. Toope
Information
International Theory , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , 20 June 2011 , pp. 326 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, José E. 2003. “Hegemonic International Law Revisited.” American Journal of International Law 97:873–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 1993. “Ideological Drift and the Struggle over Meaning.” Connecticut Law Review 25:869–891.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian. 1995. “Conceptual Questions and Jurisprudence.” Legal Theory 1:465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, Toope, Stephen. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, Toope, Stephen. 2011. “Interactional international law: an introduction.” International Theory 3:307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael, Nolte, Georg, eds. 2003. United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 2003. The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, Nevill, Penny. 2011. “Relations between International Courts and Tribunals: The ‘Regime Problem’ .” In Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation, edited by M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. 2011. “A New Approach to Regime Interaction.” In Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation, edited by M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L.Trachtman, Joel P.. 2009. Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law & Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1958. “Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart.” Harvard Law Review 71:630–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1958. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71:593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Law Commission. 2006. “Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission,” finalized by Martti Koskenniemi, UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682 (13 April).Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. 2009. “The Mystery of Global Governance.” In Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance, edited by J. Dunoff and J. Trachtman. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, Nico. 2005. “International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order.” European Journal of International Law 16:369–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2011. “The mystery of legal obligation.” International Theory 3:319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, Nicola. 2008. “Philosophy, Political Morality, and History: Explaining the Enduring Resonance of the Hart-Fuller Debate.” New York University Law Review 83:1059–1087.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam. 2008. “Better to See Law This Way.” New York University Law Review 83:1088–1108.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1994. “Fuller's Internal Point of View.” Law and Philosophy 13:285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2005. “The Social Construction of the Concept of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25:493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, Roger F. 1984. Lon L. Fuller. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Rüdiger, Volker, Röben, eds. 2008. Legitimacy in International Law. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, Kenneth. 1986. “The Ideal Element in a Definition of Law.” Law and Philosophy 5:89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar