Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:24:49.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lythrum salicaria (Purple Loosestrife) Control with Herbicides: Multiyear Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2018

Stevan Z. Knezevic ,
O. Adewale Osipitan Open the ORCID record for O. Adewale Osipitan [Opens in a new window] ,
Maxwel C. Oliveira  and
Jon E. Scott
Stevan Z. Knezevic*
Affiliation:
Professor, Northeast Research and Extension Center, Haskell Ag Lab, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Concord, NE, USA
O. Adewale Osipitan
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Northeast Research and Extension Center, Haskell Ag Lab, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Concord, NE, USA
Maxwel C. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Northeast Research and Extension Center, Haskell Ag Lab, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Concord, NE, USA
Jon E. Scott
Affiliation:
Research Technologist, Northeast Research and Extension Center, Haskell Ag Lab, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Concord, NE, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Stevan Z. Knezevic, Professor, Northeast Research and Extension Center, Haskell Ag Lab, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Concord, NE, USA (Email: sknezevic2@unl.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of 14 herbicide treatments for purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) control over a period of 10 yr. The study commenced in 2000/2001 at four wetland locations in Nebraska. The evaluated herbicides included: glyphosate at 2.2 and 3.4 kg ha−1; 2,4-D dimethylamine at 1.4 and 2.8 kg ae ha−1; triclopyr at 1.3 and 2.1 kg ae ha−1; imazapyr at 1.1 and 1.7 kg ae ha−1; metsulfuron at 0.042 and 0.084 ai kg ha−1; fosamine at 13.5 and 22.4 kg ai ha−1; triclopyr at 1.3 kg ae ha−1 plus 2,4-D amine at 1.4 ae kg ha−1; and metsulfuron at 0.042 kg ai ha−1 plus 2,4-D amine at 1.4 kg ae ha−1. Some treatments provided excellent control (90%) that lasted only one season, while others suppressed L. salicaria growth for multiple seasons, depending on the location and the age of L. salicaria stand. Application of higher rates of glyphosate, imazapyr, and metsulfuron consistently provided excellent control (≥90%) of L. salicaria that lasted 360 d after treatment at most locations. Application of fosamine and the lower rate of 2,4-D amine provided the least L. salicaria control at most locations. The older the L. salicaria stand, the more multiple applications of herbicides were needed to completely control L. salicaria. Generally, there were higher percentages of grasses in the 2,4-D-, triclopyr-, and metsulfuron-treated plots compared with higher percentages of broadleaf species in the glyphosate- and imazapyr-treated plots at each location.

Keywords

Ryan M. Wersal, Minnesota State University, MankatoInvasive speciesmetsulfuronmanagementwetland
Type
Research and Education
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 143 - 154
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, JV, Gesch, RW, Jia, Y, Chao, WS, Horvath, DP (2005) Seasonal shifts in dormancy status, carbohydrate metabolism, and related gene expression in crown buds of leafy spurge. Plant Cell Environ 28:1567–1578 Google Scholar
Champion, P, James, T, Singers, N, Bodmin, K (2011) Garlon® 360 Trial for the Control of Wetland Weeds. Science for Conservation 311. Wellington, NZ: Department of Conservation. 38 pGoogle Scholar
Chao, WS, Foley, ME, Horvath, DP, Anderson, JV (2007) Signals regulating dormancy in vegetative buds. Int J Plant Dev Biol 1:49–56 Google Scholar
Emery, SL, Perry, JA (1996) Decomposition rates and phosphorus concentrations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and cattail (Typha spp.) in fourteen Minnesota wetlands. Hydrobiologia 323:129–138 Google Scholar
Gabor, TS, Haagsma, T, Murkin, HR, Armson, E (1995) Effects of triclopyr amine on purple loosestrife and non-target wetland plants in south-eastern Ontario. J Aquat Plant Manag 33:48–51 Google Scholar
Haworth-Brockman, MJ, Murkin, HR, Clay, RT (1993) Effects of shallow flooding on newly established purple loosestrife seedlings. Wetlands 13:224–227 Google Scholar
Katovich, EJS, Becker, RL, Kinkaid, BD (1996) Influence of nontarget neighbors and spray volume on retention and efficacy of triclopyr in purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Weed Sci 44:143–147 Google Scholar
Kleppel, GS, LaBarge, E (2011) Using sheep to control purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4:50–57 Google Scholar
Klimes, J (2007) Bud banks and their role in vegetative regeneration–a literature review and proposal for simple classification and assessment. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8:115–129 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Smith, D, Kulm, R, Doty, D, Kinkaid, D, Goodrich, M, Stolcpart, R (2004) Purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) control with herbicides: single-year application. Weed Technol 18:1255–1260 Google Scholar
Lindgren, CJ, Walker, D (2013) Predicting the spread of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in the prairies. Can Field-Nat 126:306–319 Google Scholar
Mal, TK, Lovett-Doust, J (2005) Phenotypic plasticity in vegetative and reproductive traits in an invasive weed, Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae), in response to soil moisture. Am J Bot 92:819–825 Google Scholar
Malecki, RA, Blossey, B, Hight, SD, Schroeder, D, Kok, LT, Coulson, JR (1993) Biological control of purple loosestrife. BioScience 43:680–686 Google Scholar
McAvoy, TJ, Kok, LT, Johnson, N (2016) A multiyear year study of three plant communities with purple loosestrife and biological control agents in Virginia. Biol Control 94:62–73 Google Scholar
Mitich, LW (1999) Purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria L. Weed Technol 13:843–846 Google Scholar
Mullin, BH (1998) The biology and management of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Weed Technol 12:397–401 Google Scholar
Mullin, BH (2000) Invasive Plant Species. Ames, IA: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Issue Paper 13:18 pGoogle Scholar
Munger, GT (2002) Lythium salicaria (purple loosestrife). In Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Fort Collins, CO. Report. P 2Google Scholar
[NRCS-USDA] Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (2016) Soil Series Description. https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/osdname.aspx. Accessed: March 24, 2018Google Scholar
Rice, PM, Toney, JC, Bedunah, DJ, Carlson, CE (1997) Plant community diversity and growth form responses to herbicide applications for control of Centaurea maculosa . J Appl Ecol 34:1397–1412 Google Scholar
Templer, P, Findlay, S, Wigand, C (1998) Sediment chemistry associated with native and non-native emergent macrophytes of a Hudson River marsh ecosystem. Wetlands 18:70–78 Google Scholar
Thompson, DQ, Stuckey, RL, Thompson, EB (1987) Spread, Impact and Control of Purple Loosestrife in North American Wetlands. 2nd issue. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish Wildlife Research. 58 pGoogle Scholar
Weiher, E, Wisheu, IC, Keddy, PA, Moore, DR (1996) Establishment, persistence, and management implications of experimental wetland plant communities. Wetlands 16:208–218 Google Scholar
Wilcox, DA (1989) Migration and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) along highway corridors. Environ Manag 13:365–370 Google Scholar