Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:09:32.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Short-Term Vegetation Response Following Mechanical Control of Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) on the Virgin River, Nevada, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven M. Ostoja*
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Yosemite Field Station, Oakhurst California, USA, 93644
Matthew L. Brooks
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Yosemite Field Station, Oakhurst California, USA, 93644
Tom Dudley
Affiliation:
Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA 93106-6150
Steven R. Lee
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Yosemite Field Station, Oakhurst California, USA, 93644
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: sostoja@usgs.gov

Abstract

Tamarisk (a.k.a. saltcedar, Tamarix spp.) is an invasive plant species that occurs throughout western riparian and wetland ecosystems. It is implicated in alterations of ecosystem structure and function and is the subject of many local control projects, including removal using heavy equipment. We evaluated short-term vegetation responses to mechanical Tamarix spp. removal at sites ranging from 2 to 5 yr post-treatment along the Virgin River in Nevada, USA. Treatments resulted in lower density and cover (but not eradication) of Tamarix spp., increased cover of the native shrub Pluchea sericia (arrow weed), decreased density and cover of all woody species combined, increased density of both native annual forbs and the nonnative annual Salsola tragus (prickly Russian-thistle), and lower density of nonnative annual grasses. The treated plots had lower mean woody species richness, but greater herbaceous species richness and diversity. Among herbaceous species, native taxa increased in richness whereas nonnative species increased in both species richness and diversity. Thus, efforts to remove Tamarix spp. at the Virgin River reduced vegetative cover contributing to fuel loads and probability of fire, and resulted in positive effects for native plant diversity, with mixed effects on other nonnative species. However, absolute abundances of native species and species diversity were very low, suggesting that targets of restoring vegetation to pre-invasion conditions were not met. Longer evaluation periods are needed to adequately evaluate how short-term post-treatment patterns translate to long-term patterns of plant community dynamics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, EB (1982) Water and nutrient competition between Salsola kali and two native grass species (Agropyron smithii and Bouteloua gracilis). Ecology 63:732741 Google Scholar
Bateman, HL, Dudley, TL, Bean, DW, Ostoja, SM, Hultine, KR, Kuehn, MJ (2010) A river system to watch: documenting the effects of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) biocontrol in the Virgin River Valley. Ecol Restor 28:405410 Google Scholar
Bateman, HL, Ostoja, SM (2012) Invasive woody plants affect the composition of native lizard and small mammal communities in riparian woodlands. Anim Conserv 15:294304 Google Scholar
Bay, RF, Sher, AA (2008) Success of active revegetation after Tamarix removal in riparian ecosystems of the southwestern United States: A quantitative assessment of past restoration projects. Restor Ecol 16:113128 Google Scholar
Bean, DW, Dudley, TL, Hultine, KR (2012) Bring on the beetles: The history and impact of tamarisk biological control. Pages 377403 in Sher, A, Quigley, M, eds. Tamarix: A case study of ecological change in the American West. New York Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Francis, A (2009) The biology of Canadian weeds. 65. Salsola tragus L. Can J Plant Sci 89:775789 Google Scholar
Billington, DP, Jackson, DC, Melosi, MV (2005) The history of large federal dams: Planning, design and construction in the era of big dams. USDI-Bureau of Reclamation File Report. 623 pGoogle Scholar
D'Antonio, C, Meyerson, LA (2002) Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: A synthesis. Restor Ecol 10:703713 Google Scholar
D'Antonio, CM, Vitousek, PM (1992) Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:6387 Google Scholar
Douglass, CH, Nissen, SJ, Hart, CR (2013) Tamarisk management: lessons and techniques. Pages 333353 in Sher, AA, Quigley, M, eds. Tamarix: A case study of ecological change in the American West. New York Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Drus, GM (2012) Fire ecology of Tamarix . Pages 240255 in Sher, AA, Quigley, M, eds. Tamarix: A case study of ecological change in the American West. New York Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Drus, GM, Dudley, TL, Brooks, ML, Matchett, JR (2012) Influence of biological control on fire intensity profiles of tamarisk (Tamarix ramosissima Lebed.). Int J Wildland Fire 22:446458 Google Scholar
Dudley, T, Bean, D (2012) Tamarisk biocontrol, endangered species risk and resolution of conflict through riparian restoration. BioControl 57:331347 Google Scholar
Dudley, TL, Brooks, ML (2011) Effectiveness monitoring of springfed wetlands and riparian restoration treatments: progressive management of invasive tamarisk in the southern Nevada Region. Final report, Clark County Desert Conservation Program, Project 2005-UCSB-552-P. 158 pGoogle Scholar
Dudley, TL, DeLoach, CJ (2004) Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.), endangered species and biological weed control - can they mix? Weed Technol 18:15421551 Google Scholar
Fleishman, E, McDonal, N, MacNally, R, Murphy, DD, Walters, J, Floyd, T (2003) Effects of floristics, physiognomy and non-native vegetation on riparian bird communities in a Mojave Desert watershed. J Anim Ecol 72:484490 Google Scholar
Friedman, JM, Auble, GT, Shafroth, PB, Scott, ML, Merigliano, MF, Freehling, MD, Griffin, ER (2005) Dominance of non-native riparian trees in western USA. Biol Invasions 7:747751 Google Scholar
Friedman, JM, Osterkamp, WR, Lewis, WM (1996) The role of vegetation and bed-level fluctuations in the process of channel narrowing. Geomorphology 14:341351 Google Scholar
Harms, RS, Hiebert, RD (2006) Vegetation response following invasive tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) removal and implications for riparian restoration. Restor Ecol 14:461472 Google Scholar
Hart, CR, White, LD, McDonald, A, Sheng, ZP (2005) Saltcedar control and water salvage on the Pecos river, Texas, 1999–2003. J Environ Manage 75:399409 Google Scholar
Hilmes, MM, Vaill, JE (1997) Estimates of bridge scour at two sites on the Virgin River, southeastern Nevada using a sediment-transport model and historical geomorphic data. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4073. http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri974073/report.html#HDR28. Accessed January 7, 2013Google Scholar
Horton, JS, Campbell, CJ (1974) Management of phreatophyte and riparian vegetation for maximum multiple use values. Res. Pap. RM-117. Fort Collins, CO U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 23 pGoogle Scholar
Hultine, K, Dudley, TL (2013) Tamarix from organism to landscape. Pages 149167 in Sher, A, Quigley, M, eds. Tamarix: A case study of ecological change in the American West. New York Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Jaeger, KL, Wohl, E (2011) Channel response in a semiarid stream to removal of tamarisk and Russian olive. Water Resour Res 47 Google Scholar
Jones, ZF, Bock, CE (2005) The Botteri's sparrow and exotic Arizona grasslands: an ecological trap or habitat regained? Condor 107:731741 Google Scholar
Mack, RN, Foster, SK (2009) Eradicating plant invaders: combining ecologically-based tactics and broad-sense strategy. Pages 3560 in Inderjit, ed. Management of Non-native Invasive Plant Species. Heidelberg, Germany Springer Google Scholar
Marshall, RM, Stoleson, SH (2000) Chapter 3: Threats. Pages 1324 in Status, ecology, and conservation of the southwestern willow flycatcher. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-60Google Scholar
McDaniel, KC, Taylor, JP (1999) Steps for restoring bosque vegetation along the middle Rio Grande of New Mexico. Pages 713714 in Eldridge, D, Freudenberger, D, eds. People and rangelands: building the future: Proceedings, 6th International Rangeland Congress. Aitkenvale, Queensland, Australia Townsville, Queensland Google Scholar
Meinhardt, KA, Gehring, CA (2013) Tamarix and soil ecology. Pages 225239 in Sher, A, Quigley, M, eds. Tamarix: A case study of ecological change in the American West. New York Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Mortenson, SJ, Weisberg, PJ (2010) Does river regulation increase dominance of woody species in riparian landscapes? Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:562574 Google Scholar
Naiman, RJ, Decamps, H, Pollock, M (1993) The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol Appl 3:209212 Google Scholar
Oksanen, J, Blanchet, FG, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, Minchin, PR, O'Hara, RB, Simpson, GL, Solymos, P, Stevens, MHH, Wagner, H (2012) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-5. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed March 12, 2013Google Scholar
O' Meara, S, Larsen, D, Owens, C (2010) Methods to control saltcedar and Russian olive. Pages 65102 in Shafroth, PB, Brown, CA, Merritt, DM, eds. Saltcedar and Russian olive control demonstration act science assessment: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5247 Google Scholar
Parsons, AJ, Abrahams, AD, Wainwright, J (1996) Responses of interrill runoff and erosion rates to vegetation change in southern Arizona. Geomorphology 14:311317 Google Scholar
Patten, DT (1998) Riparian ecosystems of semi-arid North America: Diversity and human impacts. Wetlands 18:498512 Google Scholar
R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed March 12, 2013Google Scholar
Reynolds, LV, Cooper, DJ (2011) Ecosystem response to removal of exotic riparian shrubs and a transition to upland vegetation. Plant Ecol 212:12431261 Google Scholar
Richardson, DM, Holmes, PM, Esler, KJ, Galatowitsch, SM, Stromberg, JC, Kirkman, SP, Pysek, P, Hobbs, RJ (2007) Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Divers Distrib 13:126139 Google Scholar
Robinson, TW (1965) Introduction, spread and areal extent of saltcedar (Tamarix) in the western states. USGS Prof. Paper 491-AGoogle Scholar
Sabo, JL, Sponseller, R, Dixon, M, Gade, K, Harms, T, Heffernan, J, Jani, A, Katz, G, Soykan, C, Watts, J, Welter, J (2005) Riparian zones increased regional species richness by harboring different, not more species. Ecology 86:5662 Google Scholar
SAS Institute, Inc (2009) JMP 8.0 Statistical Discovery Software. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA Google Scholar
Seaby, RM, Henderson, PA (2006) Species Diversity and Richness Version 4? Lymington, England Pisces Conservation Google Scholar
Shafroth, PB, Beauchamp, VB, Briggs, MK, Lair, K, Scott, ML, Sher, AA (2008) Planning riparian restoration in the context of Tamarix control in western North America. Restor Ecol 16:97112 Google Scholar
Shafroth, PB, Brown, CA, Merritt, DM, eds. (2010) Saltcedar and Russian olive control demonstration act science assessment: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5247. 143 pGoogle Scholar
Shafroth, PB, Cleverly, JR, Dudley, TL, Taylor, JP, van Riper, C, Weeks, EP, Stuart, JN (2005) Control of Tamarix in the western United States — implications for water salvage, wildlife use and riparian restoration. Environ Manage 35:116 Google Scholar
Sogge, MK, Felley, DL, Wotawa, M (2005) A quantitative model of avian community and habitat relationships along the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon. Pages 161192 in van Riper, C, Mattson, D, eds. The Colorado Plateau II: biophysical, socioeconomic and cultural research. Tucson, AZ University of Arizona Press Google Scholar
Solow, AR (1993) A simple test for change in community structure. J Anim Ecol 62:191193 Google Scholar
Stromberg, JC (2001) Restoration of riparian vegetation in the south-western United States: importance of flow regimes and fluvial dynamism. J Arid Environ 49:1734 Google Scholar
Taylor, JP, McDaniel, KC (1998) Restoration of saltcedar (Tamarix sp.) -infested floodplains on the Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge. Weed Technol 12:345352 Google Scholar
Taylor, JP, McDaniel, KC (2004) Revegetation strategies after saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) control in headwater, transitional, and depositional watershed areas. Weed Technol 18:12781282 Google Scholar
van Riper, C, Paxton, KL, O'Brien, C, Shafroth, PB, McGrath, LJ (2008) Rethinking avian response to Tamarix on the lower Colorado River: a threshold hypothesis. Restor Ecol 16:155167 Google Scholar
Vincent, KR, Friedman, JM, Griffin, ER (2009) Erosional consequence of saltcedar control. Environ Manage 44:218227 Google Scholar
Whitaker, D, Christman, M (2010) Clustsig: Significant Cluster Analysis. R package version 1.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clustsig. Accessed March 12, 2013Google Scholar
Young, JA (1991) Tumbleweed. Sci Am 264:8287 Google Scholar