Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-9m8n8 Total loading time: 0.545 Render date: 2022-10-03T16:08:52.547Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Article contents

THE FINAL STAGE OF NINEVITE 5 POTTERY: MORPHOLOGICAL TYPES, TECHNOLOGY AND DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS FROM TELL ARBID (NORTH-EAST SYRIA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2016

Abstract

This paper presents major trends in pottery development in the final Ninevite 5 period, which corresponds to the final EJZ 2 period in the Syrian Jezirah. This discussion is based primarily on a pottery assemblage from Tell Arbid, a site in north-east Syria. The pottery was recovered from a dwelling quarter (Area D), where both final Ninevite 5 (final EJZ 2) and post-Ninevite 5 (EZJ 3) occupation were recognized. Excavations at Tell Arbid have provided new data regarding the late Ninevite 5 pottery repertoire and its internal development. Morphological types of vessels and their technology are discussed at length. Major traits of the final Ninevite 5 pottery are recognized and defined, including pottery “index fossils” as well as some less distinct pottery types. Chronological variability of pottery types has also been traced, special attention being given to continuity and changes in pottery production between final Ninevite 5 and post-Ninevite 5 (EJZ 3) periods. A trend toward standardization visible in the final Ninevite 5 pottery development is related to political and economic factors in the Syrian Jezirah at this time.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 78 , December 2016 , pp. 175 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broekmans, T., Adriaens, A. and Pantos, E.. 2006. Insights into North Mesopotamian Metallic Ware. Archaeometry 48: 219–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderone, L. and Weiss, H.. 2003. The End of the Ninevite 5 Period at Tell Leilan. Pp. 193220 in Rova, E. and Weiss, H. (eds.), The Origins of North Mesopotamian Civilization: Ninevite 5 Chronology, Economy, Society. Subartu IX.Google Scholar
Curvers, H.H. and Schwartz, G.M.. 1990. Excavations at Tell al-Raqai: A Small Rural Site of Early Urban Northern Mesopotamia. American Journal of Archaeology 94: 323.Google Scholar
Daszkiewicz, M. and Schneider, G.. 1996. Chemical Composition of North Mesopotamian Early Dynastic Period Ceramics from Tell Rad Shaqrah. Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean 7: 171–75.Google Scholar
Duru, R. 1979. Keban Project Değirmentepe Excavations 1973. Keban Project Publications, Series III, no. 2. Ankara.Google Scholar
Eichler, S., Wäfler, M. and Warburton, D.. 1990, Tall al-Hamidiya 2. Göttingen Symposium. Recent Excavations in the Upper Khabur Region, Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis Series Archaeologica 6. Freiburg Schweiz: Universitätsverlag, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Erkanal, H. 1988. Girnavaz. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient Gesellschaft 120: 139–52.Google Scholar
Erkanal, H. 1989, 1988 Girnavaz Kazıları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı XI: 261–73.Google Scholar
Fortin, M. 1988. Rapport préliminaire sur la première campagne de fouilles (printemps 1986) à Tell ‘Atij, sur le moyen Khabour, Syria 65: 139–71.Google Scholar
Fortin, M. 1990, Rapport préliminaire sur la seconde campagne de fouilles à Tell ‘Atij et la première à Tell Gudeda (automne 1987) sur le moyen Khabour, Syria 67: 219–56.Google Scholar
Fortin, M. and Schwartz, G.M.. 2003. The Middle Habur in the Third Millennium B.C. Pp. 221–48 in Rova, E. and Weiss, H. (eds), The Origins of North Mesopotamian Civilization: Ninevite 5 Chronology, Economy, Society. Subartu IX.Google Scholar
Grossman, K. 2013. Early Bronze Age Hamoukar: A Settlement Biography. PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago: Chicago.Google Scholar
Grossman, K. 2014. Ninevite 5 Ceramics. Pp. 83–94 in Lebeau, M. (ed.), Associated Regional Chronologies for the Ancient Near East and the Eastern Mediterranean, Interregional vol I: Ceramics. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Kibaroğlu, M., Falb, C. and Satır, M.. 2008. On the Origin of the Northmesopotamian Metallic Ware: A New View form Sediment Geochemistry. Pp. 211–23 in Yalcin, Ü. (ed.), Anatolian Metal IV, Der Anschnitt, Beiheft 21. Bochum: Deutsches Bergau-Museum.Google Scholar
Killick, R. and Roaf, M.. 2003. The Relative Chronology of Ninevite 5 Sites in the Tigris Region and Beyond. Pp. 73–82 in Rova, E. and Weiss, H. (eds.), The Origins of North Mesopotamian Civilization: Ninevite 5 Chronology, Economy, Society. Subartu IX.Google Scholar
Koşay, H.Z. 1976. Keban Project Pulur Excavations 1968–1970. Keban Project Publications, Series III, no. 1. Ankara.Google Scholar
Kühne, H. and Schneider, G.. 1988. Neue Untersuchungen zur Metallischen Ware. Damaszener Mitteilungen 3: 83139.Google Scholar
Lebeau, M. 2003. Aperçu de la Jezirah Bichrome Ware découverte à Tell Beydar (chantier H). Pp. 309–16 in Lebeau, M. and Suleiman, A. (eds.), Tell Beydar, the 1995–1999 Seasons of Excavations, A Preliminary Report. Subartu 10. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Lebeau, M. (ed.). 2011. Arcane, Associated Regional Chronologies for the Ancient Near East and the Eastern Mediterranean, vol. I, Jezirah. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Mallowan, M.E.L. 1937. The Excavations at Tall Chagar Bazar and an Archaeological Survey of the Habur Region, Second Campaign, 1936. Iraq 4: 91177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matney, T. and Somers, L.. 1999. The Second Season of Work at Ziyaret Tepe in the Diyarbakir Province, Preliminary Report. Anatolica 25: 203–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matney, T., McGinnis, J., McDonald, H., Nicoll, K., Rainville, L., Roaf, M., Smith, M.L., Stein, D.. 2003. Archaeological Investigations at Ziyaret Tepe, 2002. Anatolica 29: 175221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R.J. (ed.). 2003. Excavations at Tell Brak, vol. IV: Exploring an Upper Mesopotamian Regional Centre, 1994–1996. Cambridge-London: McDonald Institute Monographs, British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Numoto, H. 1989. Changes of the Ninevite 5 Carinated Bowl. Al-Rafidaan 10: 1326.Google Scholar
Numoto, H. 2003. Ninevite 5 Pottery from Tell Fisna and Thuwaij and its Relative Chronology in Mosul Region. Pp. 83–152 in Rova, E. and Weiss, H. (eds.), The Origins of North Mesopotamian Civilization: Ninevite 5 Chronology, Economy, Society. Subartu IX.Google Scholar
Oates, D, Oates, J. and McDonald, H.. 2001. Excavations at Tell Brak, vol. 2: Nagar in the Third Millennium BC. Cambridge-London: McDonald Institute Monographs, British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Ökse, T. and Görmüş, A.. 2006. Excavations at Salat Tepe in the Upper Tigris Region: Stratigraphical Sequence and Preliminary Results of the 2005–2006 Seasons. Akkadica 127: 167–97.Google Scholar
Pruss, A. 2000. The Metallic Ware of Upper Mesopotamia: Definition, Chronology and Distribution. Pp. 193203 in Marro, C. and Hauptmann, H. (eds.), Chronologies des pays du Caucase et de l'Euphrate aux IVé-IIIé millénaires. Actes du colloque d'Istanbul, 16–19 décembre 1999. Varia Anatolica 11. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Rice, P.M. 1987. Pottery Analysis. A Sourcebook. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roaf, M. 1984. Excavations at Tell Mohammed Arab in the Eski Mosul Dam Salvage Project. Iraq 46: 141–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roaf, M. 2000. Ninive-5-Kultur. Reallexikon der Assyriologie 9: 434–39.Google Scholar
Roaf, M. and Killick, R.. 1987. A Mysterious Affair of Styles: The Ninevite 5 Pottery of Northern Mesopotamia. Iraq 49: 199230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rova, E. 1988. Distribution and Chronology of the Nineveh 5 Pottery and its Culture. Rome: Universita degli Studi di Roma.Google Scholar
Rova, E. 2003. The IIIrd Millennium Pottery Morphology. The Typology Principles, the Coding System and Some Preliminary Results. Pp. 395489, in Lebeau, M. and Suleiman, A. (eds.), Tell Beydar, the 1995–1999 Seasons of Excavations. A Preliminary Report. Subartu X. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Rova, E. 2011. Ceramic. Pp. 4972, in Lebeau, M. (ed.), Associated Regional Chronologies for the Ancient Near East and the Eastern Mediterranean, vol. I, Jezirah. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Rova, E. and Weiss, H. (eds.). 2003. The Origins of North Mesopotamian Civilization: Ninevite 5 Chronology, Economy, Society. Subartu IX. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Sagona, A. 1984. The Caucasian Region in the Early Bronze Age, International Series 214. Oxford, British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Schachner, A. 2004. Vorbericht über die Ausgrabungen in Giricano, 2001. Pp. 505–46 in Tuna, N., Öztürk, I., and Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds.), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs Activities in 2001. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar
Schneider, G. 1989. Technological Study of North-Mesopotamian Stone Ware. World Archaeology 21/1: 3050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, G. and Daszkiewicz, M.. 2001. Stone Ware and Ninevite 5. Notes on composition and technology of pottery from Tell Brak. Pp. 194216 in Oates, D., Oates, J., McDonald, H. (eds.), Excavations at Tell Brak, vol. 2: Nagar in the Third Millennium bc . Cambridge and London: McDonald Institute Monographs, British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G.M. 1987. The Ninevite V Period and the Development of Complex Society in Northern Mesopotamia. Paléorient 13/2: 93100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, G.M. 1988. A Ceramic Chronology from Tell Leilan. Operation 1. New Haven and London: Yale University.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G.M. and Curvers, H.H.. 1992. Tell al-Raqai 1989 and 1990: Further Investigations at a Small Rural Site of Early Urban Northern Mesopotamia. American Journal of Archaeology 96: 397418.Google Scholar
Smogorzewska, A. 2010. Technological Marks on Pottery Vessels. Evidence from Tell Arbid, Tell Rad Shaqrah and Tell Djassa el-Gharbi (Northeastern Syria). Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean 19: 555–64.Google Scholar
Smogorzewska, A. 2012. Jazirah Burnished Ware from Tell Arbid and its Northern Affiliations. Anatolica 38: 129–47.Google Scholar
Smogorzewska, A. 2013. Fenestrated pot stands in Ninevite 5 pottery tradition: New evidence from Tell Arbid (north-east Syria). Akkadica 134/2: 187–99.Google Scholar
Smogorzewska, A. 2014. Ninevite 5 Kitchen Ware: Morphology and Technological Characteristic . Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean 23: 471504.Google Scholar
Uysal, B. 2008. The Technical Features of the Ninevite 5 ware in Southeastern Anatolia . Pp. 313–23 in Córdoba, J.M., Molist, M., Carmen Pérez, M., Rubio, I., I. and Martínez, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East (Madrid, 3–8 April 2006). Madrid: Centro Superior de Estudios Sobre el Oriente Próximo y Egipto.Google Scholar
Valentini, S. 2008a. Ninevite 5 Pottery from Tell Barri in Jezirah. Pp. 259–72 in Kühne, H., Czichon, R.M. and Kreppner, F.J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East (29 March–3 April 2004, Freie Universität Berlin), vol. 2: Social and Cultural Transformation: The Archaeology of Transitional Periods and Dark Ages. Excavations Reports. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Valentini, S. 2008b. The Jezirah Burnished Ware. Antiguo Oriente 6: 2538.Google Scholar
Valentini, S. 2008c. Tell Barri: Tendenze evolutive nella ceramica del Protodinastico. Pp. 203–19 in Pierobon Benoit, R., (ed.), Tell Barri. Storia di un insediamento antico tra Oriente e Occidente. Atti del convegno di Napoli (24–25 Novembre 2005), La Parola del Passato 63.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. 1990. Tell Leilan 1989: New Data for Mid-Third Millennium Urbanization and State Formation, Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orientgesellschaft 122: 193–218.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

THE FINAL STAGE OF NINEVITE 5 POTTERY: MORPHOLOGICAL TYPES, TECHNOLOGY AND DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS FROM TELL ARBID (NORTH-EAST SYRIA)
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

THE FINAL STAGE OF NINEVITE 5 POTTERY: MORPHOLOGICAL TYPES, TECHNOLOGY AND DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS FROM TELL ARBID (NORTH-EAST SYRIA)
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

THE FINAL STAGE OF NINEVITE 5 POTTERY: MORPHOLOGICAL TYPES, TECHNOLOGY AND DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS FROM TELL ARBID (NORTH-EAST SYRIA)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *