Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:42:45.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of prescribing practices in an acute psychiatric ward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

John Tully
Affiliation:
University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
Elizabeth Park
Affiliation:
University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
Allison Dunne
Affiliation:
University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
Ivan T Murray
Affiliation:
University College Hospital Galway and Cavan Mental Health Services, Ireland
Colm McDonald
Affiliation:
University College Hospital Galway and National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
Brian P Hallahan*
Affiliation:
University College Hospital Galway and National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
*
*Correspondence Email: brian.hallahan@nuigalway.ie

Abstract

Objectives: Prescription writing is a basic clinical skill for all doctors; however, errors in prescriptions are frequent and can result in significant harm to patients both from sub-therapeutic dosages and from over prescribing. This study examines the prescribing practices of ‘as required’ medications in an acute psychiatric inpatient unit attached to a university teaching hospital.

Method: A clinical audit was conducted to examine both prescribing practices of ‘as required’ medication and recording of ‘as required’ medication in nursing notes. A series of educational interventions were undertaken in an attempt to improve prescribing practices in relation to ‘as required’ medication and two further audits were completed to assess any change in practice and whether such changes were sustained.

Results: Psycho-education led to an improvement in a number of prescribing practices, including increased generic prescribing, improved documentation of indications for medication administration and increased writing of medication dosages in acceptable abbreviations. These benefits were maintained four months after the education interventions. Rates of documenting the frequency of medication correctly and recording the administration of medication in nursing notes remained low.

Conclusion: Our audit cycle clearly demonstrates that education can ameliorate prescribing practices and these improvements were maintained four months after education was delivered. However some aspects of prescribing practice remained deficient, and more focused educational interventions are required in these areas.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.van Doormaal, JE, van den Bemt, PM, Mol, PGet al.Medication errors: the impact of prescribing and transcribing errors on preventable harm in hospitalised patients. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18: 22–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Cunney, A, Williams, D, Felly, J. Prescription monitoring in an Irish hospital. Ir Med J 2003; 96: 20–3.Google Scholar
3.Nirodi, A, Mitchell, A. The quality of psychotropic drug prescribing in patients in psychiatric units for the elderly. Aging Ment Health 2002; 6: 191–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Winslow, E, Nestor, V, Davidoff, SKet al.Legibility and completeness of physicians' handwritten medication orders. Heart Lung 1997; 26: 158–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Ved, P, Coupe, T. Improving prescription quality in an in-patient mental health unit: three cycles of clinical audit. Psychiat Bull 2002; 31: 293–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hallahan, B, Murray, I, McDonald, C. Improving prescription quality in an in-patient mental health unit: three cycles of a clinical audit: letter. Psychiat Bull 2007; 31: 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Baker, JA, Lovell, K, Harris, N, Campbell, M. Multidisciplinary consensus of best practice for pro re nata (PRN) psychotropic medications within acute mental health settings: a Delphi study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2007; 14: 478–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Geffen, J, Sorenson, L, Stokes, Jet al.Pro re nata medication for psychoses: an audit of practice in two metropolitan hospitals. Aust NZJ Psychiatry 2002; 36: 649656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.McGettigan, P, McManus, J, O'Shea, Bet al.Low rate of generic prescribing in the Republic of Ireland compared to England and Northern Ireland: prescribes' concerns. Ir Med J 1997; 90: 146–7.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Himmel, W, Simmenroth-Nayda, A, Niebling, Wet al.What do primary care patient think about generic drugs? Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005; 43: 472–9.Google Scholar
11.Jobst, BC, Holmes, GL. Prescribing antiepileptic drugs: should patients be switched on the basis of cost? CNS Drugs 2004; 18:617–28.Google Scholar