Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ksp62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T17:41:17.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global dominant party systems dataset (GDPS): Data on executive dominance 1900–2024

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2025

Boris Lipovina*
Affiliation:
Doctoral School of International Relations and Political Science, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
Get access

Abstract

Despite a long tradition of research on dominant party systems (DPS), comparative analysis remains limited by conceptual ambiguities, regional and historical biases, and the absence of accessible data. This research note introduces the Global Dominant Party Systems (GDPS) Dataset, which includes 187 cases of executive dominance across 106 independent countries from 1900 to 2024, addressing the regional and historical biases that have traditionally plagued the literature. Drawing on foundational theories and refined concepts, the dataset differentiates between dominant parties and DPS and develops the minimal definition of DPS that focuses on executive arena and at least minimally contested elections. The dataset identifies cases with mechanical properties typical of DPS, that is those in which one party (or coalition) consistently monopolizes executive power and electoral competition fails to produce changes in government leadership. Despite setting permissive minimal criteria, the dataset also offers a broad range of variables on democracy, corruption and institutional features which can be used to set different criteria for case selection and conduct robustness checks. The dataset also includes variables on ethnic and opposition fragmentation, voter turnout, economy and population size, enabling researchers to investigate the institutional and socio-economic foundations of dominance across regime types and world regions. Finally, the proposed model of DPS evolution and change can serve as a useful guide for qualitative research on unpacking causal mechanisms. While limited to positive cases of dominance, the dataset offers new potential for cross-regional hypothesis testing and theory development on executive power, party system change, and democratic resilience.

Information

Type
Research Note: Dataset
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Società Italiana di Scienza Politica.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Lipovina supplementary material

Lipovina supplementary material
Download Lipovina supplementary material(File)
File 33.4 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Lipovina Dataset

Link