Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Learning from the other side: how social networks influence turnout in a referendum campaign

  • Davide Morisi (a1) and Carolina Plescia (a1)
Abstract

Interpersonal discussion is considered to be one of the most influential sources of opinion formation and behaviour. Yet, an unresolved puzzle remains within the literature: while some studies show that discussion with not like-minded citizens depresses political participation, other studies, on the contrary, indicate that the same type of interpersonal discussion can foster political engagement. In this study, we address this unresolved democratic dilemma for the first time in a context of direct democracy, by focussing on the campaign leading to the 2016 Italian constitutional referendum. Specifically, we pay particular attention to the interaction between network diversity, ambivalence, and political knowledge. The findings show that frequent interactions with not like-minded citizens increase turnout. The results based on regression models and structural equation modelling indicate that this positive effect is channelled mainly through political learning, since network diversity increases factual knowledge about the constitutional reform, which in turn is associated with an increase in turnout. We do not find a significant effect of network diversity on ambivalence, as predicted by previous studies. These findings have important implications for deliberative theories and campaign strategies.

Copyright
Corresponding author
References
Hide All
Baldassarri, D. (2009), ‘Social networks, political heterogeneity, and interpersonal influence. Evidence from the 2006 Italian elections’. Paper prepared for the Political Networks Workshop at the University of California, May 18, Davis, CA.
Beck, P.A., Dalton, R.J., Greene, S. and Huckfeldt, R. (2002), ‘The social calculus of voting: interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices’, American Political Science Review 96(1): 5773.
Bellucci, P., De Angelis, A. and Garzia, D. (2017), ‘When personalization meets direct democracy. An analysis of the determinants of voting in the Italian Constitutional referendum, 2016’. Paper presented at the ITANES Workshop ‘Referendum Costituzionale 2016: Elettori, Partiti e Media nella Seconda Repubblica’, Rome, 9–10 February.
Bennett, S.E. (1986), Apathy in America 1960-1984:Causes and Consequences of Citizen Political Indifference, Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational.
Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P.F. and McPhee, W.N. (1954), Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bowler, S. and Donovan, T. (1998), Demanding Choices. Opinion, Voting and Direct Democracy, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Calvert, R.L. (1985), ‘The value of biased information: a rational choice model of political advice’, Journal of Politics 47(2): 530555.
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. and Stokes, D.E. (1960), The American Voter, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Campus, D., Pasquino, G. and Vaccari, C. (2008), ‘Social networks, political discussion, and voting in Italy: a study of the 2006 election’, Political Communication 25: 423444.
Chambers, S. (2003), ‘Deliberative democratic theory’, Annual Review of Political Science 6(1): 307326.
Christin, T., Hug, S. and Sciarini, P. (2002), ‘Interests and information in referendum voting: an analysis of Swiss voters’, European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 759776.
Cohen, J. (1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colombo, C., De Angelis, A. and Morisi, D. (2017), ‘Demanding choices or easy shortcuts? A study on the 2016 Italian constitutional referendum’. Paper presented at the ITANES Workshop ‘Referendum Costituzionale 2016: Elettori, Partiti e Media nella Seconda Repubblica’, Rome, 9–10 February.
Cutts, D. and Fieldhouse, E. (2009), ‘What small spatial scales are relevant as electoral contexts for individual voters? The importance of the household on turnout at the 2001 general election’, American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 726739.
Delli Carpini, M.X. and Keeter, S. (1996), What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Delli Carpini, M.X., Cook, F.L. and Jacobs, L.R. (2004), ‘Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature’, Annual Review of Political Science 7(1): 315344.
Denver, D. (2002), ‘Voting in the 1997 Scottish and Welsh devolution referendums: information, interests and opinions’, European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 827843.
De Vreese, C.H. and Semetko, H.A. (2004), ‘News matters: influences on the vote in the Danish 2000 euro referendum campaign’, European Journal of Political Research 43(5): 699722.
Eveland, W.P. and Shah, D. V. (2003), ‘The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias’, Political Psychology 24(1): 101117.
Eveland, W.P. and Hively, M.H. (2009), ‘Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation’, Journal of Communication 59(2): 205224.
Feldman, L. and Price, V. (2008), ‘Confusion or enlightenment? How exposure to disagreement moderates the effects of political discussion and media use on candidate knowledge’, Communication Research 35(1): 6187.
Foos, F. and de Rooij, E.A. (2017), ‘All in the family: partisan disagreement and electoral mobilization in intimate networks-a spillover experiment’, American Journal of Political Science 61(2): 289304.
Gil de Zúñiga, H. and Valenzuela, S. (2011), ‘The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement’, Communication Research 38(3): 397421.
Granovetter, M.S. (1973), ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 13601380.
Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2002), ‘Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media’, The Information Society 18(5): 385401.
Hobolt, S.B. (2005), ‘When Europe matters: the impact of political information on voting behaviour in EU referendums’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 15(1): 85109.
Huckfeldt, R. and Sprague, J. (1995), Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J.M. and Osborn, T. (2004), ‘Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: the political consequences of heterogeneous networks’, Political Psychology 25(1): 6595.
Ikeda, K. and Richey, S. (2009), ‘The impact of diversity in informal social networks on tolerance in Japan’, British Journal of Political Science 39(3): 655668.
Ikeda, K. and Boase, J. (2010), ‘Multiple discussion networks and their consequence for political participation’, Communication Research 38(5): 660683.
Inglehart, R. (1979), ‘Political action: the impact of values, cognitive level and social background’, in S.H. Barns and M. Kaase (eds), Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 343380.
Karpowitz, C.F. and Mendelberg, T. (2011), ‘An experimental approach to citizen deliberation’, in J.N. Druckman, D.P. Green, J.H. Kuklinski and A. Lupia (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258272.
Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P.E. (1955), Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Communication, New York: Free Press.
Klofstad, C.A. (2007), ‘Talk leads to recruitment: how discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation’, Political Research Quarterly 60(2): 180191.
Klofstad, C.A. (2015), ‘Exposure to political discussion in college is associated with higher rates of political participation over time’, Political Communication 32(2): 292309.
Klofstad, C.A., Sokhey, A.E. and McClurg, S.D. (2013), ‘Disagreeing about disagreement: how conflict in social networks affects political behavior’, American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 120134.
Knight, J. and Johnson, J. (1994), ‘Aggregation and deliberation: on the possibility of democratic legitimacy’, Political Theory 22(2): 277296.
Kriesi, H. (2005), Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience, Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Lake, R.L.D. and Huckfeldt, R. (1998), ‘Social capital, social networks, and political participation’, Political Psychology 19(3): 567583.
Larcinese, V. (2007), ‘Does political knowledge increase turnout? Evidence from the 1997 British general election’, Public Choice 131(3): 387411.
Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B. and Gaudet, H. (1944), The People’s Choice; How the Voter Makes Up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign, New York: Columbia University Press.
Lazer, D., Rubineau, B., Chetkovich, C., Katz, N. and Neblo, M. (2010), ‘The coevolution of networks and political attitudes’, Political Communication 27(3): 248274.
LeDuc, L. (2002), ‘Referendums and elections. how do campaigns differ?’, in D.M. Farrell and R. Schmitt-Beck (eds), Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums, London: Routledge, pp. 145162.
Lee, H., Kwak, N. and Campbell, S.W. (2015), ‘Hearing the other side revisited: the joint workings of cross-cutting discussion and strong tie homogeneity in facilitating deliberative and participatory democracy’, Communication Research 42(4): 569596.
Lenart, S. (1994), Shaping Political Attitudes: The Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Mass Media, London: Sage Publications.
Levine, J.M. and Russo, E. (1995), ‘Impact of anticipated interaction on information acquisition’, Social Cognition 13(3): 293317.
Lupton, R. and Thornton, J. (2017), ‘Disagreement, diversity, and participation: examining the properties of several measures of political discussion network characteristics’, Political Behavior 39(3): 585608.
Mancosu, M. (2016), ‘Contexts, networks, and voting behavior: the social flow of political communication in Italy’, Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 46(3): 335354.
Matsusaka, J.G. and Palda, F. (1999), ‘Voter turnout: how much can we explain?’, Public Choice 98(3–4): 431446.
McClurg, S.D. (2003), ‘Social networks and political participation: the role of social interaction in explaining political participation’, Political Research Quarterly 56(4): 448464.
McKuen, M. (1990), ‘Speaking of politics: individual conversational choice, public opinion, and the prospects for deliberative democracy’, in J.A. Ferejohn and J.H. Kuklinski (eds), Information and Democratic Process, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 5999.
McLeod, J.M., Scheufele, D.A. and Moy, P. (1999), ‘Community, communication, and participation: the role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation’, Political Communication 16(3): 315336.
McLeod, J.M., Scheufele, D.A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E.M., Holbert, R.L., Zhang, W., Zubric, S. and Zubric, J. (1999), ‘Understanding deliberation the effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum’, Communication Research 26(6): 743774.
McPhee, W.N., Smith, R.B. and Ferguson, J. (1963), ‘A theory of informal social influence’, in W.N. McPhee (ed.) Formal Theories of Mass Behavior , New York, NY: Free Press, pp. 7499.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, J.M. (2001), ‘Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks’, Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415444.
Morisi, D. (2016), ‘Voting under uncertainty: the effect of information in the Scottish independence referendum’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26(3): 354372.
Mutz, D.C. (2002a), ‘The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation’, American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 838855.
Mutz, D.C. (2002b), ‘Cross-cutting social networks: testing democratic theory in practice’, American Political Science Review 96(1): 111126.
Mutz, D.C. (2006), Hearing the Other Side. Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neuman, W.R. (1986), The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nir, Lilach (2005), ‘Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(4): 422442.
Pattie, C.J. and Johnston, R.J. (2008), ‘It’s good to talk: Talk, disagreement and tolerance’, British Journal of Political Science 38(4): 677698.
Popkin, S. and Dimock, M.A. (1999), ‘Political knowledge and citizen competence’, in S.L. Elkin and K.E. Soltan (eds) Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 117146.
Putnam, R. (2000), Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Riker, W.H. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1968), ‘A theory of the calculus of voting’, American Political Science Review 62(1): 2542.
Scheufele, D.A., Nisbet, M.C. and Brossard, D. (2003), ‘Pathways to political participation? Religion, communication contexts, and mass media’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15(3): 300324.
Scheufele, D.A., Nisbet, M.C., Brossard, D. and Nisbet, E.C. (2004), ‘Social structure and citizenship: examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation’, Political Communication 21(3): 315338.
Scheufele, D.A., Hardy, B.W., Brossard, D., Waismel‐Manor, I.S. and Nisbet, E. (2006), ‘Democracy based on difference: examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship’, Journal of Communication 56(4): 728753.
Schmitt-Beck, R. and Partheymüller, J. (2012), ‘Why voters decide late: a simultaneous test of old and new hypotheses at the 2005 and 2009 German federal elections’, German Politics 21(3): 299316.
Schmitt‐Beck, R. and Lup, O. (2013), ‘Seeking the soul of democracy: a review of recent research into citizens’ political talk culture’, Swiss Political Science Review 19(4): 513538.
Sinclair, B. (2012), The Social Citizen: Peer Networks in Political Behavior, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, H.H. (1986), ‘Newspaper readership as a determinant of political knowledge and activity’, Newspaper Research Journal 7(2): 4754.
Tarrow, S. (1998), Power in Movement. Social Movements and Contentious Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, K., Johann, D., Kritzinger, S., Plescia, C. and Zeglovits, E. (2016), ‘Estimating sensitive behavior: the ICT and high-incidence electoral behavior’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 29(1): 151171.
Thompson, M.M. and Zanna, M.P. (1995), ‘The conflicted individual: personality‐based and domain specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes’, Journal of Personality 63(2): 259288.
Thompson, M.M., Zanna, M.P. and Griffin, D.W. (1995), ‘Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence’, in R.E. Petty and J.A. Krosnick (eds) Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, New York: Psychology Press, pp. 361386.
Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Jost, J.T., Nagler, J. and Tucker, J.A. (2016), ‘Of echo chambers and contrarian clubs: exposure to political disagreement among German and Italian users of Twitter’, Social Media + Society 2(July–September): 124.
Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y. and de Zúñiga, H.G. (2012), ‘Social networks that matter: exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24(2): 163184.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L. and Brady, H.E. (1995), Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vezzoni, C. and Mancosu, M. (2016), ‘Diffusion processes and discussion networks: an analysis of the propensity to vote for the 5 Star Movement in the 2013 Italian election’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26(1): 121.
Vezzoni, C. and Segatti, P. (2016), ‘Il referendum costituzionale, tra personalizzazione e antipolitica’. Rivista il Mulino, 6 July. Retrieved 2 February 2017 from https://www.rivistailmulino.it/item/3374.
Zuckerman, A. (ed.) (2005), The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Zuckerman, A. and Kotler-Berkowitz, L. (1998), ‘Politics and society: political diversity and uniformity in households as a theoretical puzzle’, Comparative Political Studies 31(4): 464497.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
  • ISSN: 0048-8402
  • EISSN: 2057-4908
  • URL: /core/journals/italian-political-science-review-rivista-italiana-di-scienza-politica
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Morisi and Plescia supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (4.7 MB)
4.7 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed