Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:48:14.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Evaluation of Japan's Current Energy Policy in the Context of the Azadegan Oil Field Agreement Signed in 2004

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2006

RAQUEL SHAOUL
Affiliation:
East Asian Studies Department, Tel-Aviv University

Abstract

In 2004, a government-backed Japanese consortium signed an agreement with the government of Iran to develop the major Azadegan oil field. Not only has the project been given the go-ahead despite numerous political obstacles and poor prospects attributed it, but the agreement also appears to be in conflict with Japan's energy policy, materializing from the mid 1980s to date. Consequently it is important to evaluate Azadegan in terms of Japan's evolving oil policy. Three alternative arguments are proposed to evaluate the quality of policy change: Japan–Iran's ‘special relationship’, bureaucratic factors in the energy policy-making process, and the rise of China. The conclusion emerging from this article is that the rise of China and the growing competition between Tokyo and Beijing in the Middle East and elsewhere are the primary factors in Japan's decision to conclude the Azadegan oil deal. The Azadegan case study therefore sets a new precedent for Japanese energy policy which emphasizes the political and strategic rather than economic factors leading this policy formulation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The submitted article is based on field research in Japan (Japan Foundation research Grant 2003–4/hosted – Meiji Gakuin Daigaku, Tokyo) which included interviews with key policy-making politicians and bureaucrats involved in energy policy formulation. Interviews with journalists dealing withMiddle East issues, and with businessmen in the oil industry provided cross-checking information to evaluate data gathered from formal sources.