Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Comparative Analysis of Public Support for Developing Regional Regime in East Sea Rim (Sea of Japan) Region

  • JUNG HYOUN KIM (a1)

Abstract

The East Sea (or Sea of Japan) (ESR/SOJ) Rim region, in which five countries – Japan, China, Russia, and North and South Korea – have their own coastal areas, is complex and dynamic, with many emerging regional security concerns. In this paper, the author tries to show that there is the possibility of a maritime regional regime in the ESR/SOJ region by investigating the level of public support, in Japan and South Korea, for the formation of a regional regime. Based on the theoretical assumptions of constructivism, the author analyzes what kinds of individual's social position factors influence the level of support for regional regime formation by conducting a nested regression model of survey datasets. The results of the statistical analysis suggest that people with a high level of national pride in South Korea are more likely to support a regional regime in the ESR/SOJ region. In contrast, for Japanese people, there is no relationship between people's national pride and the level of support for regional regime formation. The economic recession in Japan since the early 1990s has made public concern more about domestic policy than about foreign policy issues. Based on strong support of the bottom, public opinion towards regional regime formation, the South Korean government may play a leading role in developing a regional regime in the ESR/SOJ region (when the process of negotiation begins) as in the case of Japan in nineteenth century.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Adler, Emanuel (1997), ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 3 (3): 319–63.
Alexander, Lewis M. (1983), ‘Ocean Enclosure Movement: Inventory and Prospect’, The San Diego Law Review, 20: 561–94.
Allen, Patrick Michael (1997), ‘Testing Hypothesses in Nested Regression Model’, in Understanding Regression Analysis, London: Springer, pp. 113–17.
Barnett, Robert W. (1984), Beyond War: Japan's Concept of Comprehensive National Security, Washington, DC: Pergamon.
Billig, Michael (1995), Banal Nationalism, London: Sage Publications.
Calichman, Richard (2008), Overcoming Modernity: Cultural Identity in Wartime Japan, New York: Columbia University Press.
Chicago Council on Global Affairs and World Public Opinion, (2007), 14 March.
Fort, Bertrand and Webber, Douglas (2006), Regional Integration in East Asia and Europe: Convergence or Divergence? New York: Routledge.
Gabel, Matthew (1998), Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Gilpin, Robert (1971) ‘The Politics of Transnational Economic Relations’, International Organization, 25 (3): 398419.
Gowa, Joanne (1989), ‘Rational Hegemons, Excludable Goods and Small Groups: An Epitaph for Hegemonic Stability Theory’, World Politics, 41: 307–24.
Gowa, Joanne (1994), Allies, Adversaries and International Trade, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hjerm, Mikael (1998), ‘National Identities, National Pride and Xenophobia: A Comparison of Four Western Countries’, Acts Sociology, 41: 335–47.
Jervis, Robert (1983), ‘Security Regimes’, in Krasner, Stephen, International Regime, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kahler, Miles (1992), ‘Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers’, International Organization, 46 (3): 681708.
Keohane, Robert O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert, Nye, Joseph, and Hoffmann, Stanley (1993), After Cold War: International Institutions and States Strategies in Europe, 1989–1991, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Korea Herald (1999), ‘Lessons from Fisheries Now’, 23 March.
Krasner, Stephen D. (1983), ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, in Krasner, Stephen D, International Regimes, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 121.
Lake, David A. (1993), ‘Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential?’, International Studies, 37: 459–89.
Marks, Gary (2004), ‘Conclusion: European Integration and Political Conflict’, in Marks, Gary and Steenbergen, Marco, European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–59.
Martin, Lisa (1992), ‘Interests, Power, and Multilateralism’, International Organization, 46 (4): 765–92.
McKeown, Timothy (1983), ‘Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe’, International Organization, 37 (1): 7391.
McLaren, Lauren (2006), Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morgan, Joseph R., and Valencia, Mark J. (1992), Atlas for Marine Policy in East Asian Seas, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ruggie, John G. (1992), ‘Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution’, International Organization, 46 (3): 561–98.
Smith, A. (1994), ‘The Problem of National Identity: Ancient, Medieval and Modern’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 17 (3): 375400.
Snidal, Duncan (1991), ‘Relative Gains and International Cooperation’, American Political Science Review, 1991: 701–726.
Snidal, Duncan (1985), ‘The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory’, International Organization, 39 (4): 579614.
Stein, Arthur (1993), ‘Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World’, in Baldwin, David (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press.
Valencia, Mark J. (2000), ‘Regional Maritime Regime Building: Prospects in Northeast and Southeast Asia’, Ocean Development and International Law, 31: 223–47.
Viner, Jacob (1950), The Customs Union Issue, New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Weeks, Stanley B. (1995), ‘Law and Order at Sea: Pacific Co-Operation in Dealing with Piracy, Drugs, and Illegal Migration’, The CSCAP Working Group on Maritime Cooperation, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 1–15.
Wendt, Alexander (1995), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young, Oran R. (1983), International Co-operation for Natural Resources and the Environment, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Zehfuss, Maja (2002), Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The Comparative Analysis of Public Support for Developing Regional Regime in East Sea Rim (Sea of Japan) Region

  • JUNG HYOUN KIM (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.