Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Measuring Judicial Independence Reconsidered: Survival Analysis, Matching, and Average Treatment Effects

  • KENTARO FUKUMOTO (a1) (a2) and MIKITAKA MASUYAMA (a3)
Abstract

This article reconsiders how to judge judicial independence by using the Japanese judicature, one of the allegedly-most dependent judiciary branches. In their influential work, Ramseyer and Rasmusen (2003) argue that judges who once belonged to a leftist group take longer to reach a ‘moderately prestigious status’ under the long-term conservative rule of Japan. Their method does not, however, deal appropriately with the possibility of judges not reaching this position because the judge dies, retires early, or is still at the early stage of her career. Ramseyer and Rasmusen also mistakenly assume that all judges will eventually obtain this position. This article develops a survival analysis model of judicial careers and attempts to solve the problems of censoring, left truncation, and split population. We also offer a way to utilize a matching procedure to estimate average treatment effects on censored time-to-event as well as event occurrence. We re-analyze a corrected version of Ramseyer and Rasmusen's data using their and our methods. One of the most important findings is that, contrary to what Ramseyer and Rasmusen argue, leftist judges are not discriminated against in terms of the timing of promotion.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Becker, Rolf and Saalfeld, Thomas (2004), ‘The Life and Times of Bills’, in Doring, Herbert and Hallerberg, Mark (eds.), Patterns of Parliamentary Behavior: Passage of Legislation across Western Europe, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 5790.
Bland, J. Martin and Altman, Douglas G. (1994), ‘Matching’, British Medical Journal, 309:1128.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet and Jones, Bradford (2004), Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Radcliffe, Peter M., and Bartels, Brandon L. (2006), ‘The Incidence and Timing of PAC Contributions to Incumbent US House Members, 1993–94’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30 (4): 549–79.
Clark, David H. and Regan, Patrick M. (2003), ‘Opportunities to Fight: A Statistical Technique for Modeling Unobservable Phenomena’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47 (1): 94115.
Diamond, Alexis and Sekhon, Jasjeet S. (2013), ‘Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 95 (3): 932–45.
Epstein, Lee and Knight, Jack (1998), The Choices Justices Make, Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
Ferejohn, John, Rosenbluth, Frances, and Shipan, Charles (2007), ‘Comparative Judicial Politics’, in Boix, Charles and Stokes, Susan Carol (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 727–51.
Gibson, James L. (2006), ‘Judicial Institutions’, in Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah A., and Rockman, Bert A., The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 514–34.
Ginsburg, Tom (2003), Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, Kermit L. (2005), ‘Judicial Independence and the Majoritarian Difficulty’, in Hall, K. L. and McGuire, K. T., The Judicial Branch, Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, pp. 6085.
Hettinger, Virginia A. and Zorn, Christopher (2005), ‘Explaining the Incidence and Timing of Congressional Responses to the US Supreme Court’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30 (1): 528.
Ho, Daniel, Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth (2007), ‘Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference’, Political Analysis, 15 (3): 199236.
Holland, Paul W. (1986), ‘Statistics and Casual Inference’, Journal of American Statistical Association, 81: 945–60.
King, Gary and Zeng, Langche (2007), ‘When Can History be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference’, International Studies Quarterly, 51 (1): 183210.
Maitra, Pushkar and Smyth, Russell (2004), ‘Judicial Independence, Judicial Promotion and the Enforcement of Legislative Wealth Transfers: An Empirical Study of the New Zealand High Court’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 17 (2): 209–35.
Masuyama, Mikitaka (2001), ‘Agenda Power in the Japanese Diet: A Duration Analysis of Lawmaking’, Ph. D. Dissertaton, University of Michigan.
Masuyama, Mikitaka (2005), ‘Saibankan kyaria no seizon bunseki [Survival Analysis of Judicial Career]’, Seikei Hogaku, 61: 411–56.
Martin, Lanny W. (2004), ‘The Government Agenda in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 48 (3): 445–61.
Nihon Minshu Horituka Kyokai Shiho Seido Iinkai (1998), Zensaibankan keireki soran [Biographical Information on All Judges], 3rd edn, Tokyo: Kojinsha.
Ramseyer, J. Mark and Rasmusen, Eric B. (2003), Measuring Judicial Independence: The Political Economy of Judging in Japan, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ramseyer, J. Mark and Rasmusen, Eric B. (2006), ‘The Case for Managed Judges: Learning from Japan after the Political Upheaval of 1993’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154: 1879–930.
Ramseyer, J. Mark and Rosenbluth, Frances M. (1993), Japan's Political Marketplace, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ramseyer, J. Mark and Rosenbluth, Frances M. (1998), The Politics of Oligarchy: Institutional Choice in Imperial Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salzberger, Eli and Fenn, Paul (1999), ‘Judicial Independence: Some Evidence from the English Court of Appeal’, Journal of Law and Economics, 42 (2): 831–47.
Shetreet, Shimon and Deschênes, Jules (1985), Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate, Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
Kenkyusho, Shiso Undo (1969), Osorubeki saiban [Fearsome Trials], Tokyo: Zenbosha.
Solomon, Peter H. (2007), ‘Courts and Judges in Authoritarian Regimes’, World Politics, 60 (1): 122–45.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Japanese Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 1468-1099
  • EISSN: 1474-0060
  • URL: /core/journals/japanese-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed