Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 43
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hannaford, Matthew J. and Nash, David J. 2016. Climate, history, society over the last millennium in southeast Africa. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, p. n/a.

    Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo J. 2016. The Encyclopedia of Empire.

    Kaarsholm, Preben 2015. Islam, secularist government, and state–civil society interaction in Mozambique and South Africa since 1994. Journal of Eastern African Studies, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 468.

    Kalusa, Walima T. 2015. Strange bedfellows: David Livingstone, Sekeletu, imported goods, and the 1853–1856 trans-African expedition. Journal of African Cultural Studies, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 133.

    2015. Give a Man a Fish.

    Ferguson, James 2013. Declarations of dependence: labour, personhood, and welfare in southern Africa. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 223.

    Coplan, David B. 2012. People of the Early Caledon River Frontier and Their Encounters. African Historical Review, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 55.

    Hamilton, Carolyn 2011. Backstory, Biography, and the Life of the James Stuart Archive. History in Africa, Vol. 38, p. 319.

    Laband, John 2011. The Encyclopedia of War.

    McCall, Grant 2010. Changing Views of Drakensberg San Rock Art: Examining Landscape Use, Ritual Activity, and Contact Through Multivariate Content-Based Spatial Analysis. American Antiquity, Vol. 75, Issue. 4, p. 773.

    Pérouse de Montclos, Marc-Antoine 2010. Migration forcée et urbanisation de crise : l'Afrique subsaharienne dans une perspective historique. Autrepart, Vol. 55, Issue. 3, p. 3.

    Francis, Michael 2009. Silencing the past: historical and archaeological colonisation of the Southern San in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Anthropology Southern Africa, Vol. 32, Issue. 3-4, p. 106.

    Jannecke, Crystal 2008. Strategies of Representation in Tsitsikamma Fingo/Mfengu Land Restitution Claims. South African Historical Journal, Vol. 60, Issue. 3, p. 452.

    Everingham, Mark Jannecke, Crystal and Palmer, Robin 2007. Getting Your Own Back: Land Restitution among the Oneida Indians of North America and the Tsitsikamma Mfengu of South Africa. Safundi, Vol. 8, Issue. 4, p. 435.

    Gunner, Liz 2005. Remapping land and remaking culture: memory and landscape in 20th-century South Africa. Journal of Historical Geography, Vol. 31, Issue. 2, p. 281.

    SAUNDERS, CHRISTOPHER 2002. Great Treks?. South African Historical Journal, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 300.

    Coplan, David B. 2000. A measure of civilisation: Revisiting the Caledon valley frontier. Social Dynamics, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 116.

    Davenport, T. R. H. and Saunders, Christopher 2000. South Africa.

    KROS, CYNTHIA 2000. Telling Lies and then Hoping to Forget all about History. South African Historical Journal, Vol. 42, Issue. 1, p. 69.

    Bunn, David 1999. Morbid Curiosities: Mutilation, Exhumation, and the Fate of Colonial Painting. Transforming Anthropology, Vol. 8, Issue. 1-2, p. 39.


The Mfecane as Alibi: Thoughts on Dithakong and Mbolompo1

  • Julian Cobbing (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2009

The ‘mfecane’ is a characteristic product of South African liberal history used by the apartheid state to legitimate South Africa's racially unequal land division. Some astonishingly selective use or actual invention of evidence produced the myth of an internally-induced process of black-on-black destruction centring on Shaka's Zulu. A re-examination of the ‘battles’ of Dithakong and Mbolompo suggests very different conclusions and enables us to decipher the motives of subsequent historiographical amnesias. After about 1810 the black peoples of southern Africa were caught between intensifying and converging imperialistic thrusts: one to supply the Cape Colony with labour; another, at Delagoa Bay, to supply slaves particularly to the Brazilian sugar plantations. The flight of the Ngwane from the Mzinyathi inland to the Caledon was, it is argued, a response to slaving. But they ran directly into the colonial raiding-grounds north of the Orange. The (missionary-led) raid on the still unidentified ‘Mantatees’ (not a reference to MaNtatisi) at Dithakong in 1823 was one of innumerable Griqua raids for slaves to counter an acute shortage of labour among Cape settlers after the British expansionist wars of 1811–20. Similar Griqua raids forced the Ngwane south from the Caledon into the Transkei. Here, at Mbolompo in 1828, the Ngwane were attacked yet again, this time by a British army seeking ‘free’ labour after the reorganisation of the Cape's labour-procurement system in July 1828. The British claim that they were parrying a Zulu invasion is exposed as propaganda, and the connexions between the campaign and the white-instigated murder of Shaka are shown. In short, African societies did not generate the regional violence on their own. Rather, caught within the European net, they were transformed over a lengthy period in reaction to the attentions of external plunderers. The core misrepresentations of ‘the mfecane’ are thereby revealed; the term, and the concept, should be abandoned.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of African History
  • ISSN: 0021-8537
  • EISSN: 1469-5138
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-african-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *