Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:30:55.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of Import Demand for Wooden Beds in the U.S.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Yang Wan
Affiliation:
Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Changyou Sun
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Donald L. Grebner
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Get access

Abstract

The market of wooden beds in the U.S. has been flooded with imports from China and Vietnam in recent years. Static and dynamic Almost Ideal Demand System models are used to assess the import demand for wooden beds from the top seven supplying countries. The analyses reveal that the antidumping investigation on China has some temporary trade depression effect on China, but trade diversion occurs to Vietnam, Indonesia, Canada, and Brazil. The formal implementation of antidumping duties since 2005 has not shown any significant effect on the trade pattern. U.S. consumers spend more on beds from newly industrialized countries and there are moderate degrees of substitution among wooden beds from most countries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, G., and Blundell, R.Testing Restrictions in a Flexible Dynamic Demand System: An Application to Consumers' Expenditure in Canada.The Review of Economic Studies 50(1983):397410.Google Scholar
Boonsaeng, T., and Wohlgenant, M.K.A Dynamic Approach to Estimating and Testing Separability in U.S. Demand for Imported and Domestic Meats.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(2009): 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buehlmann, U., Bumgardner, M., Lihra, T., and Frye, M.Attitudes of U.S. Retailers toward China, Canada, and the United States as Manufacturing Sources for Furniture: An Assessment of Competitive Priorities.Journal of Global Marketing 20(2006):6173.Google Scholar
Cao, X., Hansen, E.N., Xu, M., and Xu, B.China's Furniture Industry Today.” Forest Products Journal 54(2004): 1423.Google Scholar
Dale, R. Antidumping Law in a Liberal Trade Order. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Deaton, A., and Muellbauer, J.An Almost Ideal Demand System.The American Economic Review 70(1980):312–26.Google Scholar
Drayse, M.H.Globalization and Regional Change in the U.S. Furniture Industry.Growth and Change 39(2008):252–82.Google Scholar
Eakins, J.M., and Gallagher, L.A.Dynamic Almost Ideal Demand Systems: An Empirical Analysis of Alcohol Expenditure in Ireland.” Applied Economics 35(2003): 1025–36.Google Scholar
Edgerton, D.L.On the Estimation of Separation Demand Models.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 18(1993): 141–46.Google Scholar
Edgerton, D.L., and Shukur, G.Testing Autocorrelation in a System Perspective.Econometric Reviews 18(1999):343–86.Google Scholar
Enders, W. Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F., and Granger, C.W.J.Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.Econometrica 55(1987):251–76.Google Scholar
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Economic Data—FRED. Internet site: http://stlouisfed.org (Accessed February 25, 2010).Google Scholar
Feleke, S.T., and Kilmer, R.L.Analysis of the Demand for Imported Meat in Switzerland Using a Dynamic Specification: Implications for the European Union.” Agribusiness 23(2007): 497510.Google Scholar
Gardner, B.L.Farm Retail Price Spread in a Competitive Food Industry.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(1975):399409.Google Scholar
Gazo, R., and Quesada, H.J.A Review of Competitive Strategies of Furniture Manufacturers.Forest Products Journal 55(2005):412.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hall, 2003.Google Scholar
Henneberry, S.R., and Hwang, S.Meat Demand in South Korea: An Application of the Restricted Source-Differentiated Almost Ideal Demand System Model.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(2007):4760.Google Scholar
Henneberry, S.R., and Mutondo, J.E.Agricultural Trade among Nafta Countries: A Case Study of U.S. Meat Exports.Review of Agricultural Economics 31(2009):424–45.Google Scholar
Henneberry, S.R., Piwethongngam, K., and Qiang, H.Consumer Food Safety Concerns and Fresh Produce Consumption.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(1999):98113.Google Scholar
Holgersson, H.E.T. and Shukur, G.Some Aspects of Non-Normality Tests in Systems of Regression Equations.Communications in Statistics Simulation and Computation 30(2001):291310.Google Scholar
Holgersson, H.E.T. and Shukur, G.Testing for Multivariate Heteroscedasticity.Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 74(2004):879–96.Google Scholar
Houthakker, H.S., and Taylor, L.D. Consumer Demand in the United States: Analyses and Projections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Johansen, S.Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors.Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 12(1988):231–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, S., and Juselius, K.Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to Demand for Money.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52(1990): 169210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaabia, M.B., and Gil, J.M.Estimation and Inference in Cointegrated Demand Systems: An Application to Tunisian Meat Consumption.European Review of Agriculture Economics 28(2001):349–70.Google Scholar
Karagiannis, G., Katranidis, S., and Velentzas, K.An Error Correction Almost Ideal Demand System for Meat in Greece.Agricultural Economics 22(2000):2935.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, H.W., and Zhang, D.W.Incidence of the 1996 Canada—U.S. Softwood Lumber Agreement and the Optimal Export Tax.Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 52(2004):7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, G., Song, H., and Witt, S.F.Modeling Tourism Demand: A Dynamic Linear Aids Approach.” Journal of Travel Research 43(2004): 141–50.Google Scholar
Li, Y., and Zhang, D.Incidence of the 1996 U.S.–Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement among Landowners, Loggers, and Lumber Manufacturers in the U.S. South.” Forest Science 52(2006): 422–31.Google Scholar
Lloyd, T., Morrissey, O., and Reed, G.Estimating the Impact of Anti-Dumping and Anti-Cartel Actions Using Intervention Analysis.The Economic Journal 108(1998):458–76.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Internet site: http://www.r-project.org (Accessed March 1, 2009).Google Scholar
Robb, D., and Xie, B.A Survey of Manufacturing Strategy and Technology in the Chinese Furniture Industry.European Management Journal 21(2003):484–96.Google Scholar
Schuler, A., Taylor, R., and Araman, P.A.Competitiveness of U.S. Wood Furniture Manufacturers: Lessons Learned from the Softwood Moulding Industry.” Forest Products Journal 51(2001): 1420.Google Scholar
Sexauer, B.The Role of Habits and Stocks in Consumer Expenditure.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 91(1977): 127–42.Google Scholar
Shukur, G.Dynamic Specification and Mis-specification in Systems of Demand Equations: A Testing Strategy for Model Selection.Applied Economics 34(2002):709–25.Google Scholar
Shukur, G., and Edgerton, D.L.The Small Sample Properties of the Reset Test as Applied to Systems of Equations.Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 72(2002):909–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, B. Brazil: Solid Wood Products Annual Report 2006. Washington, DC: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2007.Google Scholar
Staiger, R.W., and Wolak, F.A.Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Microeconomics 1994(1994):51118.Google Scholar
U.S. ITC. Wooden Bedroom Furniture from China. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 731-TA-1058, Publication 3667, 2004.Google Scholar
U.S. ITC. Interactive Tariff and Trade Data Web. Internet site: http://dataweb.usitc.gov (Accessed February 11, 2009).Google Scholar
Yang, S., and Koo, W.W.Japanese Meat Import Demand Estimation with the Source Differentiated AIDS Model.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(1994):396408.Google Scholar