Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:41:59.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Induced Policy Innovation: Environmental Compliance Requirements for Dairies in Texas and Florida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Amy Purvis Thurow
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
John Holt
Affiliation:
The University of Florida
Get access

Abstract

Environmental policies make a difference in shaping producers' choices among dairy production technologies, the sizes and locations of their dairies, and even which dairies ultimately survive. Induced policy innovation means producers reacting to policies, and policies, in turn, being shaped by their effects. Profiles of experiences with environmental compliance in Texas and Florida were analyzed. Results demonstrate that the timing and sequencing of policy signals make a difference in compliance behavior and options. Furthermore, ex ante assessments of the costs of environmental compliance are challenging to carry out, and consequently can undermine the policy goal of maintaining the maximum number of options for compliance.

Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdalla, C.W., and Kelsey, T.W.. “Breaking the Impasse: Helping Communities Cope with Change at the Rural-Urban Interface.” J. Soil and Water Conserv. 51,6(November-December 1996):462-66.Google Scholar
Anderson, T.L., and Hill, P.J.. “Environmental Federalism: Thinking Smaller.” Issue No. PS-8, PERC Policy Series, Political Economy Research Center, Bozeman MT, 1996.Google Scholar
Andrews, W.J.Reconnaissance of Water Quality at Nine Dairy Farms in North Florida, 1990-91.” USGS Water Resources Investigations Rep. No. 92-4058, U.S.Geological Survey, Denver CO, 1992.Google Scholar
Babb, E.M.Future of Dairy Marketing Order.” Staff Pap. No. 363, Food and Resour. Econ. Dept., University of Florida, 1996.Google Scholar
Batie, S.S.Future Environmental Policy: The State Role.” Paper presented at Symposium on the Influence of Social Trends on Agricultural Natural Resources, Washington DC, 21 May-2 June 1995.Google Scholar
Baumol, W.J., and Oates, W.E.. The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boggess, W.G.The Poverty of Applied Policy Analysis.” J. Agr. and Appl. Econ. 27,1(1995):112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boggess, W.G., Flaig, E.G., and Fonyo, C.M.. “Florida's Experience with Managing Nonpoint Source Phosphorus Runoff into Lake Okeechobee.” In The Management of Nonpoint Source Pollution, eds., Russell, C. and Shogren, J.. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Boggess, W.G., Holt, J., and Smithwick, R.P.. “The Economic Impact of the Dairy Rule on Dairies in the Lake Okeechobee Drainage Basin.” Staff Pap. No. 91-39, Food and Resour. Econ. Dept., University of Florida, 1991.Google Scholar
Carriker, R.R.The FL-115 Design Team on Florida's Regulatory Environment.” Unpub. memorandum, Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences, Coop. Ext. Ser., Gainesville FL, 1996.Google Scholar
Clouser, R.L., Mulkey, D., Boggess, W.G., and Holt, J.. “The Economic Impact of Regulatory Decisions in the Dairy Industry: A Case Study in Okeechobee County, Florida.” J. Dairy Sci. 77(1994):325-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congress of the U.S., Office of Technology Assessment. “U.S. Dairy at a Crossroad: Biotechnology and Policy Choices.” Special Rep. No. OTA-F-470. Washington DC: U.S.Government Printing Office, May 1991.Google Scholar
Cubbage, S.Look Out for Phosphorus.” Dairy Herd Management 31(September 1994):4248.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, D.Feasibility of On-Farm Composting.” Pub. No. RRC[RU-90[2, Rodale Research Center, Emmaus PA, 1990.Google Scholar
Ervin, D.E., and Graffy, E.A.. “Leaner Environmental Policies for Agriculture.” Choices (4th Quarter 1996):2733.Google Scholar
Fallen, R., Weimar, M., and Crawford, T.. “Here's Why Milk's Moving West.” Hoard's Dairyman, 10 January 1994, pp. 3435.Google Scholar
Fleming, R.The Market Administrator's Report: Texas Marketing Area.”Office of the Milk Market Administrator, Carrollton TX, December 1996.Google Scholar
Foster, S.Program Finds Dairies Complying—Mostly.” Stephenville [Texas] Empire-Tribune, 17 February 1993.Google Scholar
Frarey, L.C., Jones, R., and Pratt, S.J.. “Planned Intervention: Merging Voluntary CAFO Pollution Abatement with Command-and-Control Regulation.” In Balancing Animal Production and the Environment. Great Plains Pub. No. 151. Denver CO: National Cattlemen's Association, 1994.Google Scholar
Gardiner, D.Does Economic Policy Conflict with Economic Growth?Resources 115(1994):1921.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office. “Animal Agriculture: Information on Waste Management and Water Quality Issues.” Briefing Rep. No. GAO/RCED-95-200BR to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S.Senate, Washington DC, 1995.Google Scholar
Gerlin, A.As the State's Milk Production Increases, So Do the Screams of Environmentalists.” Wall Street Journal, 25 May 1994, p. T1.Google Scholar
Glover, TLivestock Manure: Foe or Fertilizer?” In Agricultural Outlook. USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington DC, June 1996.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., and Cochran, M.J.. “The Feasibility of Poultry Litter Transportation from Environmentally Sensitive Areas to Delta Row Crop Production.” Agr. and Resour. Econ. Rev. 24,1(April 1995):101-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsch, J.Poultry Litter Marketing and Utilization Project: A Case Study, 1992-1995.” Unpub. rep., Winrock International, Petit John Mountain AR, 1995.Google Scholar
Hersch, V.The Price of Clean Water.” Florida Trend (January 1993):3035.Google Scholar
Holan, M.Tuls Dairy Permit Denied: Third Denial This Year Comes Despite Environmental Plans.” Stephenville [Texas] Empire-Tribune, 17 December 1993.Google Scholar
Holt, J., Andre, M., Sowerby, M., Solger, D., Vann, C., and Ludwig, K.. “Estimated 1995 Dairying Costs and Returns in Three Florida Areas.” Staff Pap. No. 96-14, Food and Resour. Econ. Dept., University of Florida, November 1993.Google Scholar
Johns, G.M.Report to the South Florida Water Management District: Analysis of Economic Impacts, Water Quality Programs, Lake Okeechobee Watershed.” Hazen and Sawyer, Environmental Engineers and Scientists, Hollywood FL, 27 March 1995.Google Scholar
Kilborn, P.T.Dutch Settlers Start Boom in Texas Dairy.” New York Times, 16 July 1995.Google Scholar
Lancaster, B.Co-op Would Market Manure: First-Ever Enterprise Seen Aiding Dairies.” Stephenville [Texas] Empire-Tribune, 29 October 1992.Google Scholar
Lanyon, L.E.A Nutrient Management Approach for Pennsylvania: Nutrient Management Decision Making.” Agronomy Fact Sheet No. 38-C, Coop. Ext. Ser., College of Agricultural Sciences, Penn State University. Undated.Google Scholar
Light, S.S., Gunderson, L.H., and Holling, C.S.. “The Everglades: Evolution of Management in a Turbulent Ecosystem.” In Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, eds., Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., and Light, S.S.. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Martin, J.H.C.A.R.E. v. Southview Farms: A Review.” In Animal Agriculture and the Environment: Nutrients, Pathogens, and Community Relations. Pub. No. NRAES-96. Ithaca NY: Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, 1996.Google Scholar
Masud, S., Lacewell, R., Schwart, R., Allen, G., and Lovell, A.. “Feasibility of Large-Scale Alternatives for Dairy Waste Recycling and Treatment: Erath County Region of Texas.” Project report to the Texas Soil and Water Conservation Board. Texas Agr. Ext. Sen, College Station, 1991.Google Scholar
Matulich, S.C., Carman, H.F., and Carter, H.O.. “Cost-Size Relationships for Large-Scale Dairies with Emphasis on Waste Management.” Giannini Foundation Res. Rep. No. 324, California Agr. Exp. Sta., Berkeley, October 1977.Google Scholar
McFarland, M.J., McFarland, A.M.S., and Sweeten, J.M.. “Comparison of Daily and Event Precipitation Totals for the Hydrologic Design of Animal Waste Treatment Systems.” In Balancing Animal Production and the Environment. Great Plains Pub. No. 151. Denver CO: National Cattlemen's Association, 1994.Google Scholar
Mead, M.Tapa from Tonya in the South Pacific. Honolulu HI: Anuenue Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Merrill, L.S.New York Manure Case Reversal Raises Regulatory Concerns.” Hoard's Dairyman, 10 January 1995, p. 9.Google Scholar
Merrill, L.S.No Clear Winners in Southview Farm Manure Suit.” Hoard's Dairyman, 25 August 1993, pp. 618-19.Google Scholar
Outlaw, J., Purvis, A., and Miller, J.. “An Evaluation of Dairy Manure Management Economics.” Res. Rep. No. 95-2, Agricultural and Food Policy Center, Texas A&M University, 1995.Google Scholar
Outlaw, J.L., Schwart, R.B. Jr., Knutson, R.D., Pagano, A.P., Gray, A., and Miller, J.W.. “Impacts of Dairy Waste Management Regulations.” Work. Pap. No. 93-4, Agricultural and Food Policy Center, Texas A&M University, May 1993.Google Scholar
Padberg, D.I.Concentration in Agriculture: A Report of the USDA Advisory Committee on Agricultural Concentration.” USDA/Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington DC, 1996.Google Scholar
Pagano, A.P., Sims, K., Holt, J., Boggess, W., and Moss, C.. “Environmental Permitting and Technological Innovation.” In Balancing Animal Production and the Environment. Great Plains Pub. No. 151. Denver CO: National Cattlemen's Association, 1994.Google Scholar
Palmer, K., Oates, W.E., and Portney, P.R.. “Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?J. Econ. Perspectives 9,4(1995):119-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M.E.America's Green Strategy.” Scientific American (April 1991):168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M.E., and van der Linde, C.. “Towards a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship.” J. Econ. Perspectives 9,4(1995):97118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portney, P.R.Does Economic Policy Conflict with Economic Growth?Resources 115(1994):2123.Google Scholar
Purvis, A., and Abdalla, C.W.. “Analyzing Manure Management Policy: Toward Improved Communication and Cross-Disciplinary Research.” In Animal Waste and the Land- Water Interface, ed., Steele, K.. Boca Raton FL: Lewis Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Purvis, A., Boggess, W.G., Moss, C.B., and Holt, J.. “Technology Adoption Decisions Under Irreversibility and Uncertainty: An Ex Ante Approach.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 77,3(1995):243-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purvis, A., and Outlaw, J.L.. “What We Know About Technological Innovation to Achieve Environmental Compliance: Policy Issues for an Industrializing Animal Agriculture.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 77,5(1995):123743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, V.J.The Industrialization of Hog Production.” Rev. Agr. Econ. 17(1995):107-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S.The Biggest Dairy in Texas.” The Dairyman (October 1993):810, 57.Google Scholar
Roenfedt, S.Save Money Now.” Dairy Herd Management 32,8(August 1995):2628.Google Scholar
Rynk, R., van de Kamp, M., Wilson, G.B., Singley, M.E., Richard, T.L., Kolega, J.J., Gouin, F.R., Laliberty, L., Kay, D., Murphy, D.W., Hoitink, H.A.J., and Brinton, W.F.. On-Farm Composting Handbook. Pub. No. NRAES-54. Ithaca NY: Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, 1992.Google Scholar
Shapley, A.N.Myths About Phosphorus.” In Animal Agriculture and the Environment: Nutrients, Pathogens, and Community Relations. Pub. No. NRAES-96. Ithaca NY: Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, 1996.Google Scholar
Shapley, A.N., Chapra, S.C., Wedepohl, R., Sims, J.T., Daniel, T.C., and Reddy, K.R.. “Managing Agricultural Phosphorus for Protection of Surface Waters: Issues and Options.” J. Environ. Quality 23(1994):437-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, J.T.Characteristics of Animal Wastes and Waste-Amended Soils: An Overview of the Agricultural and Environmental Issues.” In Animal Waste and the Land-Water Interface, ed., Steele, K.. Boca Raton FL: Lewis Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Smith, K.R.Environmental Issues from an Economic Perspective.” In Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies—1994, eds., Halbrook, S.A. and Grace, T.E., pp. 119-26. Oak Brook IL: Farm Foundation, 1995.Google Scholar
Smith, K.R., and Kuch, P.. “What Do We Know About Opportunities for Intergovernmental Institutional Innovation? Policy Issues for an Industrializing Animal Agriculture.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 77,5(1995):124449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalcup, L.Big Stick in Texas.” Dairy Today (August 1992):810.Google Scholar
Stanley, J.W.The Key to Successful Farmer Participation in Florida's Rural Clean Water Program.” In Ten Years of Controlling Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution: The RCWP Experience. Seminar Publication, EPA/625/R-92/006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Office of Water, Washington DC, August 1992.Google Scholar
Sweeten, J., Baird, C., and Manning, L.. “Animal Waste Management.” Rep. No. L-5043, Texas Agr. Ext. Ser., College Station, September 1991.Google Scholar
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. Texas Municipal Compost Marketing Manual. Austin TX: TNRCC Office of Pollution Prevention and Recycling, 1994.Google Scholar
Thurow, A.An Industrializing Animal Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Clustering.” In Privatization of Technology and Information Transfer in U.S. Agriculture: Research and Policy Implications, ed., Wolf, S.. Ankeny IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society (in press, 1997).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “The Report of the EPA/State Feedlot Working Group.” EPA, Office of Wastewater Enforcement and Compliance, Washington DC, September 1993.Google Scholar
Wright, J.L.Agriculture and Water Quality in Central New York's Finger Lake Region: Regulatory versus Voluntary Programs.” In Animal Waste and the Land-Water Interface, ed., Steele, K.. Boca Raton FL: Lewis Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar