Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T09:42:35.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some effects of wintering yearling beef cattle on different planes of nutrition: II. Slaughter data and carcass evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. L. J. Lawrence  and
J. Pearce
T. L. J. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading
J. Pearce
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The data on the conformation and age at slaughter, together with that on the slaughter and carcass work obtained from the thirty-six animals which had been subjected to differential winter feeding (see Part I), is presented and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , August 1964 , pp. 23 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassbtt, J. M. (1960). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Reading.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 292.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 69.Google Scholar
Blaxteb, K. L., Wainman, F. W. & Wilson, B. S. (1961). Anim. Prod. 3, 51.Google Scholar
Bodwell, C. E., Everitt, G. C., Habbington, G. & Pomeboy, B. W. (1959). Anim. Prod. 1, 51.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. 56, 265.Google Scholar
Eokles, C. H. & Swett, W. W. (1918). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 31.Google Scholar
Elliott, B. C. Fokkema. (1961) Bhod. Agric. J. 58, 49.Google Scholar
Hansson, A., Bbannaktg, E. & Clbasson, O. (1953). Ada Agric. Scand. 3, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, G. & Pomeroy, B. W. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 53, 64.Google Scholar
Hendriokson, B. F., Pope, L. S. & O'Dell, G. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1484 (abstract).Google Scholar
Hogan, A. G. (1929). Res. Butt. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 123.Google Scholar
Jottbert, D. M. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 5.Google Scholar
Lawbence, T. J. L. & Peabce, J. (1964). J. Agric. Sci., 63, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäkelä, A. (1956). Suom. Maataloust. Seur. Julk. 85.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. & Hamilton, T. S. (1932). J. Agric. Res. 45, 163.Google Scholar
Osboubn, D. F. & Wilson, P. N. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 54, 278.Google Scholar
Palsson, H. (1955). Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals, II. Butterworths: London.Google Scholar
Quimby, F. H. (1948). J. Nutr. 36, 177.Google Scholar
Sheehy, E. J. & Seniob, B. J. (1942). J. Dtp. Agric. Irish Free St. 39, 245.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. (1959). Nature, Lond., 184, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorster, T. H. (1960). Rhod. Agric. J. 57, 429.Google Scholar
Waters, H. J. (1908). 29th Proc. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. N.Y., p. 71.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. & Osbourn, D. F. (1960). Biol. Rev. 35, p. 324.Google Scholar
Winchester, C. F. & Howe, P. E. (1955). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 1108.Google Scholar
Winchester, C. F. & Elliss, N. B. (1957). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 1159.Google Scholar