Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Pandey, Veena and Shukla, Alok 2016. Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants, Vol 1.

    Ober, Eric S. Werner, Peter Flatman, Edward Angus, William J. Jack, Peter Smith-Reeve, Lucy and Tapsell, Chris 2014. Genotypic differences in deep water extraction associated with drought tolerance in wheat. Functional Plant Biology, Vol. 41, Issue. 11, p. 1078.

    Pu�rtolas, Jaime Ballester, Carlos Elphinstone, E. David and Dodd, Ian C. 2014. Two potato (Solanum tuberosum) varieties differ in drought tolerance due to differences in root growth at depth. Functional Plant Biology, Vol. 41, Issue. 11, p. 1107.

    Satchithanantham, S. Krahn, V. Sri Ranjan, R. and Sager, S. 2014. Shallow groundwater uptake and irrigation water redistribution within the potato root zone. Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 132, p. 101.

    Wasson, A. P. Rebetzke, G. J. Kirkegaard, J. A. Christopher, J. Richards, R. A. and Watt, M. 2014. Soil coring at multiple field environments can directly quantify variation in deep root traits to select wheat genotypes for breeding. Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 65, Issue. 21, p. 6231.

    Levy, David Coleman, Warren K. and Veilleux, Richard E. 2013. Adaptation of Potato to Water Shortage: Irrigation Management and Enhancement of Tolerance to Drought and Salinity. American Journal of Potato Research, Vol. 90, Issue. 2, p. 186.

    Parent, Annie-Claude and Anctil, François 2012. Quantifying evapotranspiration of a rainfed potato crop in South-eastern Canada using eddy covariance techniques. Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 113, p. 45.

    Ahmadi, Seyed Hamid Plauborg, Finn Andersen, Mathias N. Sepaskhah, Ali Reza Jensen, Christian R. and Hansen, Søren 2011. Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: Root distribution. Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 98, Issue. 8, p. 1280.

    Brown, Iain Poggio, Laura Gimona, Alessandro and Castellazzi, Marie 2011. Climate change, drought risk and land capability for agriculture: implications for land use in Scotland. Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 11, Issue. 3, p. 503.

    Ahmadi, Seyed Hamid Andersen, Mathias N. Plauborg, Finn Poulsen, Rolf T. Jensen, Christian R. Sepaskhah, Ali Reza and Hansen, Søren 2010. Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: Yield and water productivity. Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 97, Issue. 11, p. 1923.

    Vos, J. and Haverkort, A.J. 2007. Potato Biology and Biotechnology.


Water uptake in the potato (Solanum tuberosum) crop

  • M. A. STALHAM (a1) and E. J. ALLEN (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2005

Experiments were conducted on sandy loam soils at Cambridge University Farm over the period 1989–99 to examine the effects of irrigation regime and variety on water uptake (WU) in potatoes. Unirrigated crops extracted water from considerable distances ahead of the rooting front but frequently watered crops took up water from depths shallower than the current depth of rooting. There was an increase in the extraction of soil water at depth if crops were irrigated less frequently at moderate (i.e. 40 mm) soil moisture deficits (SMD). The SMD measured at different positions across the ridge always differed and the relationship changed during the season. This is of concern since most reports on water use in potatoes are based on a single measurement position for the neutron probe in the centre of the ridge and this location over-estimates crop water use. Crops grown on the flat had a more uniform extraction of soil water across the row width than crops grown in ridges but there was no evidence that having one part of the rooting system drier than another affected overall crop water use. Once rooting systems were established to considerable depth, WU continued from deeper roots even though upper horizons were periodically re-wetted by irrigation. For this reason, it proved impossible to relate WU to rooting density in specific horizons over the course of the season. Only early in the season did the proportion of total WU correspond reasonably closely with the proportion of total root length in each horizon. It appeared that the pattern and extent of soil drying created by a crop changes the horizons where water is extracted at different growth stages and the relative rooting density in a particular horizon is not a good indicator of the potential to take up water from that depth. Although rooting density decreased rapidly with increasing depth, roots deeper in the profile contributed a considerable component of total crop water requirement irrespective of the water status of horizons closer to the soil surface.

A series of close relationships were established between the ratio of actual : potential evapotranspiration and SMD for different daily evaporative rates. These showed that there was a limiting deficit at which the ratio of actual : potential evapotranspiration decreased rapidly with increasing SMD and this limiting deficit was inversely related to daily evapotranspiration rate. However, even at small SMDs, as daily evapotranspiration rate increased there was a significant, slow decrease in actual : potential evapotranspiration ratio. In order to maintain potential evapotranspiration rates in conditions of extreme demand in the UK (e.g. 5–7 mm/day), crops need to be maintained at <25 mm deficit but allowable deficits can be increased as demand moderates.

Corresponding author
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • ISSN: 0021-8596
  • EISSN: 1469-5146
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *