1 Berreman, Gerald D., “Is Anthropology Alive? Social Responsibility in Social Anthropology,” Current Anthropology, Vol. 9, No. 5 (Dec. 1968) pp. 391–396; and Kathleen Gough, “New Proposals for Anthropologists,” Ibid., pp. 403–407.
American Andiropological Association, “Statement on Problems of Anthropological Research and Ethics,” (1967), American Anthropological Association, 1530 P St., N.W., Washington, D. C. 20005; A.A.A. “Background Information on Problems of Anthropological Research and Ethics,” Fellow Newsletter Vol. 8, No. 1 (Jan. 1967) pp. 2–13.
2 Africa Research Group, African Studies in America: The Extended Family, (1969), Africa Research Group, P. O. Box 213, Cambridge, Mass. 02138; How Harvard Rules, (n.d.) African Research Group and The Old Mole. The New England Free Press, 791 Tremont St., Boston, Mass.; C.C.A.S. (Committee of Concerned Asian Scholars), Newsletter No. 2 (Oct. 1968). C.C.A.S. Room 304, 1737 Cambridge St., Cambridge, Mass. 02138; N.A.C.L.A. (North American Congress on Latin America), N.A.C.L.A. Research Methodology Guide. (1968) N.A.C.L.A., P. O. Box 57, Central Park Station, New York, N. Y. 10025; The University Military Complex: A Directory and Related Documents (n.d.) N.A.C.L.A. (see above for address); Radical Education Project, “Rep. Lit.” (January 1970) Radical Education Project, P. O. Box 561-A, Detroit, Michigan 48232; Theodore, Roszak (editor), The Dissenting Academy, New York: Random House, 1967.
3 Coburn, Judith, “Project Cambridge: Another Showdown for Social Sciences?” Science, Vol. 166 Dec. 5, 1969) pp. 1250–1253.
4 Africa Today Associates, “ASA: Crisis in African Studies,” Africa Today Vol. 16, Nos. 5 & 6 (Oct./Nov./Dec. 1969). Africa Today Associates and Center on International Race Relations, University of Denver, Denver, Colo. 80210.
5 Burke, Fred G., “The Meaning of Montreal,” Africa Today, Vol. 16 (Oct./Nov./Dec. 1969), Nos. 5 & 6, p. 8.
6 Challenor, Sullivan, Herchclle, “No Longer at Ease: Confrontation at the 12th Annual African Studies Association Meetings at Montreal,” Africa Today, Vol. 16 (Oct./Nov./Dec. 1969) Nos. 5 & 6, 5.
7 If scholars in some Asian area specialties have largely avoided complicity in mission-oriented research while those in other areas have succumbed, it is perhaps less a tribute to the incorruptability of the former than a consequence of the relative absence of pressures and opportunities for them to be corrupted.
8 American Anthropological Association, “Statement on Problems of Anthropological Research and Ethics,” op. cit.
9 Coburn, op. cit., p. 1253.
10 National Herald, 1968, “Himalayan Blunder,” editorial) Aug. 7, 1968. New Delhi, India.
11 See: Horowitz, Irving, The Rise and Fall of Project Camelot, (1968) Cambridge, M.I.T. Press.
12 Boffey, Philip, “Defense Research: Pressure on Social Sciences,” Science, Vol. 166 (May 30, 1969) p. 1037.
13 Insurgent Sociologist, “Introduction: Prelude to Radical Commitment,” in Counter-Convention Call of the Insurgent Sociologist. (1969) Dept. of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley, p. 2.
14 Berreman, Gerald D., “Academic Colonialism, Not So Innocent Abroad,” The Nation, Nov. 10, 1969, p. 508. See also the various articles in the symposium, “Academic Colonialism” Seminar No. 112 (Dec. 1968) New Delhi, and: Saberwal, Satish, “International Social Science, Some Political Aspects,” Economic and Political Weekly, July 4, 1970, pp. 1044–1052 (Bombay).
15 Kipphardt, Heinar, In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer (trans, by Speirs, Ruth) Hill and Wang: New York, 1967, pp. 126–127.
16 Matthews, T. S., “James Agee: Strange and Wonderful,” Saturday Review, April 16, 1966, p. 23.
