Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-96cn4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-29T17:07:40.807Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2011

Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran


The present cross-sectional study was done in order to illustrate the prevalence and types of consanguineous marriages among Afghanistan populations. Data on types of marriages were collected using a simple questionnaire. The total number of couples in the study was 7140 from the following provinces: Badakhshan, Baghlan, Balkh, Bamyan, Kabul, Kunduz, Samangan and Takhar. Consanguineous marriages were classified by the degree of relationship between couples: double first cousins, first cousins, first cousins once removed, second cousins and beyond second cousins. The coefficient of inbreeding (F) was calculated for each couple and the mean coefficient of inbreeding (α) estimated for each population. The proportion of consanguineous marriages in the country was 46.2%, ranging from 38.2% in Kabul province to 51.2% in Bamyan province. The equivalent mean inbreeding coefficient (α) was 0.0277, and ranged from 0.0221 to 0.0293 in these two regions. There were significant differences between provinces for frequencies of different types of marriages (p<0.001). First cousin marriages (27.8%) were the most common type of consanguineous marriages, followed by double first cousin (6.9%), second cousin (5.8%), beyond second cousin (3.9%) and first cousin once removed (1.8%). There were significant differences between ethnic groups for the types of marriages (χ2=177.6, df=25, p<0.001). Tajiks (Soni) and Turkmens (also Pashtuns) showed the lowest (α=0.0250) and highest (α=0.0297) mean inbreeding coefficients, respectively, among the ethnic groups in Afghanistan. The study shows that Afghanistan's populations, like other Islamic populations, have a high level of consanguinity.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Akrami, S. M. & Osati, Z. (2007) Is consanguineous marriage religiously encouraged? Islamic and Iranian considerations. Journal of Biosocial Science 39, 313316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Abdulkareem, A. A. & Ballal, S. G. (1998) Consanguineous marriage in an urban area of Saudi Arabia: rates and adverse health effects on the offspring. Journal of Community Health 23, 7883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Awadi, F. & Amin, E. K. (1992) Factors affecting birth weight in Kuwait. Part: II: pregnancy characteristics and health factors. Journal of Egypt Public Health Association 67, 5374.Google ScholarPubMed
Al-Gazali, L. I., Bener, A., Abdulrazzaq, Y. M., Micallef, R., Al-Khayat, A. I. & Gaber, T. (1997) Consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Biosocial Science 29, 491497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alper, O. M., Erengin, H., Manguoglu, A. E., Bilgen, T., Cetin, Z., Dedeoglu, N. & Luleci, G. (2004) Consanguineous marriages in the province of Antalya, Turkey. Annales de génétique 47, 129138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, S. M., Al-Halees, Z., Molina, C. & Paterson, R. M. (2001) Consanguinity and congenital heart disease in Saudi Arabia. American Journal of Medical Genetics 99, 813.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bener, A. & Hussain, A. (2006) Consanguineous unions and child health in the State of Qatar. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 372378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. (2001) Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics 60, 8998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. (2003) The bases of western attitudes to consanguineous marriage. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 45, 135138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H., Grant, J. C. & Shami, S. A. (1993) An evaluation of consanguinity as a determinant of reproductive behaviour and mortality in Pakistan. International Journal of Epidemiology 22, 463467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COSIT [Central Organization for Statistics and Information Technology] (2005) Iraq Living Conditions Survey 2004. Vol. II: Analytical Report. Ministry of Planning and Development Cooperation, Baghdad.Google Scholar
Durkin, M. S., Khan, N. Z., Davidson, L. L., Huq, S., Munir, S., Rasul, E. & Zaman, S. S. (2000) Prenatal and postnatal risk factors for mental retardation among children in Bangladesh. American Journal of Epidemiology 152, 10241033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunaid, A. A., Hummad, N. A. & Tamim, K. A. (2004) Consanguineous marriage in the capital city Sana'a, Yemen. Journal of Biosocial Science 36, 111121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerkeni, E., Monastiri, K., Saket, B., Guediche, M. N. & Ben Cheikh, H. (2007) Interplay of socio-economic factors, consanguinity, fertility, and offspring mortality in Monastir, Tunisia. Croatia Medical Journal 48, 701707.Google ScholarPubMed
Khoury, S. A. & Massad, D. (1992) Consanguineous marriage in Jordan. American Journal of Medical Genetics 43, 769775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mokhtar, M. M. & Abdel-Fattah, M. M. (2001) Consanguinity and advanced maternal age as risk factors for reproductive losses in Alexandria, Egypt. European Journal of Epidemiology 17, 559565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nafissi, S., Ansari-Lari, M. & Saadat, M. (2010) Effect of inbreeding on weight gain of offspring from birth to 12 months after birth: a study from Iran. Journal of Biosocial Science 42, 195200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Othman, H. & Saadat, M. (2009) Prevalence of consanguineous marriages in Syria. Journal of Biosocial Science 41, 685692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradeeva, G. M. & Revazov, A. A. (1987) The structure of the inbreeding coefficient in a rural Asian population. Genetika 23, 521527 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Rafiee, L. & Saadat, M. (2011) Prevalence of consanguineous marriages among Iranian Georgians. Journal of Biosocial Science 43, 4750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajab, A. & Patton, M. (2000) A study of consanguinity in the Sultanate of Oman. Annals of Human Biology 27, 321326.Google ScholarPubMed
Saadat, M. (2005) Epidemiology and mortality of hospitalized burn patients in Kohkiluye va Boyerahmad province (Iran): 2002–2004. Burns 31, 306309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saadat, M. (2007) Consanguineous marriages in Iranian folktales. Community Genetics 10, 3840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saadat, M. (2008) Is consanguineous marriage historically encouraged? Journal of Biosocial Science 40, 153154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saadat, M. (2011) Association between healthy life expectancy at birth and consanguineous marriages in 63 countries. Journal of Biosocial Science 43, 475480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saadat, M., Ansari-Lari, M. & Farhud, D. D. (2004) Consanguineous marriage in Iran. Annals of Human Biology 31, 263269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saadat, M. & Zendeh-Boodi, Z. (2006) Correlation between incidences of self-inflicted burns and means of inbreeding coefficients, an ecological study. Annals of Epidemiology 16, 708711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saha, N. & El Sheikh, F. S. (1988) Inbreeding levels in Khartoum. Journal of Biosocial Science 20, 333336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tadmouri, G. O., Nair, P., Obeid, T., Al Ali, M. T., Al Khaja, N. & Hamamy, H. A. (2009) Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reproductive Health 6, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuncbilek, E. & Koc, I. (1994) Consanguineous marriage in Turkey and its impact on fertility and mortality. Annals of Human Genetics 58, 321329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahab, A., Ahmad, M. & Shah, S. A. (2006) Migration as a determinant of marriage pattern: preliminary report on consanguinity among Afghans. Journal of Biosocial Science 38, 315325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed