Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The limits of metrical segmentation: intonation modulates infants' extraction of embedded trochees*

  • KATHARINA ZAHNER (a1), MUNA SCHÖNHUBER (a1) and BETTINA BRAUN (a1)
Abstract

We tested German nine-month-olds’ reliance on pitch and metrical stress for segmentation. In a headturn-preference paradigm, infants were familiarized with trisyllabic words (weak–strong–weak (WSW) stress pattern) in sentence-contexts. The words were presented in one of three naturally occurring intonation conditions: one in which high pitch was aligned with the stressed syllable and two misalignment conditions (with high pitch preceding vs. following the stressed syllable). Infants were tested on the SW unit of the WSW carriers. Experiment 1 showed recognition only when the stressed syllable was high-pitched. Intonation of test items (similar vs. dissimilar to familiarization) had no influence (Experiment 2). Thus, German nine-month-olds perceive stressed syllables as word onsets only when high-pitched, although they already generalize over different pitch contours. Different mechanisms underlying this pattern of results are discussed.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Katharina Zahner, University of Konstanz – Linguistics, PO Box 186, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. e-mail: katharina.zahner@uni-konstanz.de
Footnotes
Hide All
*

We thank Sophie Egger and Jana Schlegel for recording, acoustic analyses, recruitment of participants, and testing. We are very grateful to Janet Grijzenhout, head of the Baby Speech Laboratory at the University of Konstanz, for making available the lab's database and facilities as well as insightful comments. We also acknowledge support from an AFF research grant from the University of Konstanz awarded to Bettina Braun (FP 15/10). Further, we thank René Kager and Anne Cutler for discussion on the experiments and data, and in particular Elizabeth Johnson for sharing her invaluable HPP expertise and for very helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Finally, we owe special thanks to two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their suggestions and remarks.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Baayen, H. R., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]: Linguistic data consortium. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Bartels, S., Darcy, I. & Höhle, B. (2009). Schwa syllables facilitate word segmentation for 9-month-old German-learning infants. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Somerville, MA.
Baumann, S. & Grice, M. (2006). The intonation of accessibility. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 1636–57.
Baumann, S. & Hadelich, K. (2003). Accent type and givenness: an experiment with auditory and visual priming. Paper presented at the 5th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona.
Baumann, S. & Röhr, C. (2015). The perceptual prominence of pitch accent types in German. Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow.
Bion, R. A. H., Benavides-Varela, S. & Nespor, M. (2011). Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants' and adults' segmentation of speech sequences. Language and Speech 54, 123–40.
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.14, retrieved from <http://www.praat.org/>.
Bortfeld, H. & Morgan, J. L. (2010). Is early word-form processing stress-full? How natural variability supports recognition. Cognitive Psychology 60(4), 241–66.
Braun, B. (2006). Phonetics and phonology of thematic contrast in German. Language and Speech 49, 451–93.
Cumming, G. & Finch, S. (2005). Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist 60(2), 170–80.
Cutler, A. (2005). Lexical stress. In Pisoni, D. B. & Remez, R. E. (eds), The handbook of speech perception, 264–89. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Delattre, P. (1969). An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching (IRAL) 7, 294325.
Dogil, G. (1995). Phonetic correlates of word stress. Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung der Universität Stuttgart 2(2), 160.
Fernald, A. (1985). Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development 8(2), 181–95.
Fernald, A. & Kuhl, P. (1987). Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech. Infant Behavior and Development 10(3), 279–93.
Féry, C. (1998). German word stress in optimality theory. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2, 101–42.
Frota, S., Butler, J. & Vigário, M. (2014). Infants’ perception of intonation: Is it a statement or a question? Infancy 19(2), 194213.
Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1, 126–52.
Grice, M., Baumann, S. & Benzmüller, R. (2005). German intonation in autosegmental-metrical phonology. In Sun-Ah, J. (ed.), Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 5583), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hay, J. S. F. & Diehl, R. L. (2007). Perception of rhythmic grouping: testing the iambic/trochaic law. Perception & Psychophysics 69(1), 113–22.
Hayes, B. P. (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Houston, D. M. & Jusczyk, P. W. (2000). The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26(5), 1570–82.
Jessen, M., Marasek, K. & Claßen, K. (1995). Acoustic correlates of word stress and the tense/lax opposition in the vowel system of German. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm.
Johnson, E. K. (2012). Bootstrapping language: Are infant statisticians up to the job? In Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. (eds), Statistical learning and language acquisition, 5589. Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johnson, E. K. & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: when speech cues count more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language 44(4), 548–67.
Johnson, E. K. & Seidl, A. H. (2009). At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics. Developmental Science 12(1), 131–41.
Johnson, E. K. & Tyler, M. D. (2010). Testing the limits of statistical learning for word segmentation. Developmental Science 13(2), 339–45.
Jusczyk, P. W. & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants’ detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology 29(1), 123.
Jusczyk, P. W., Hohne, E. A. & Bauman, A. (1999). Infants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation. Perception & Psychophysics 61(8), 1465–76.
Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M. & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology 39(3), 159207.
Kemler Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., Mandel, D. R., Myers, J., Turk, A. & Gerken, L. (1995). The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception. Infant Behavior and Development 18(1), 111–6.
Keren-Portnoy, T., Floccia, C., DePaolis, R. A., Vihman, M. M., Delle Luche, C., Durrant, S., Duffy, H., White, L. & Goslin, J. (2015). British English infants segment words only with exaggerated infant-directed speech stimuli. Paper presented at the 2nd Workshop on Infant Language Development (WILD), Stockholm.
Kohler, K. (1991). Terminal intonation patterns in single-accent utterances of German: phonetics, phonology and semantics. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung der Universität Kiel (AIPUK) 25, 115–85.
Kohler, K. (2012). The perception of lexical stress in German: effects of segmental duration and vowel quality in different prosodic patterns. Phonetica 69, 6893.
Kuijpers, C. T., Coolen, R., Houston, D. M. & Cutler, A. (1998). Using the head-turning technique to explore cross-linguistic performance differences. In Rovee-Collier, C., Lipsitt, L. & Hayne, H. (eds), Advances in infancy research, Vol. 12, 205–20. Stamford: Ablex.
Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, M. D. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: a practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lehiste, I. (1960). An acoustic-phonetic study of internal open juncture. Phonetica 5, 154.
Lleó, C. (2002). The role of markedness in the acquisition of complex prosodic structures by German–Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism 6, 291313.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: tools for analyzing talk, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mattys, S. L., Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A. & Morgan, J. L. (1999). Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Cognitive Psychology 38(4), 465–94.
Mooshammer, C. (2010). Acoustic and laryngographic measures of the laryngeal reflexes of linguistic prominence and vocal effort in German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127(2), 1047–58.
Nazzi, T., Floccia, C. & Bertoncini, J. (1998). Discrimination of pitch contours by neonates. Infant Behavior and Development 21(4), 779–84.
Niebuhr, O. (2007). Perzeption und kognitive Verarbeitung der Sprechmelodie. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Untersuchungen. New York: Mouten de Gruyter.
Nix, A. J., Mehta, G., Dye, J. & Cutler, A. (1993). Phoneme detection as a tool for comparing perception of natural and synthetic speech. Computer Speech and Language 7, 211–28.
Norris, D., Cutler, A., McQueen, J. M. & Butterfield, S. (2006). Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 53, 146–93.
Peters, B., Kohler, K. & Wesener, T. (2005). Melodische Satzakzentmuster in prosodischen Phrasen deutscher Spontansprache – Statistische Verteilung und sprachliche Funktion [Melodic sentence accent patterns in spontaneous German prosodic phrases – statistical distribution and linguistic function]. In Kohler, K., Kleber, F. & Peters, B. (eds), Prosodic structures in German spontaneous speech (AIPUK 35a), 185201. Kiel: IPDS.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274(5294), 1926–8.
Schneider, K. & Möbius, B. (2007). Word stress correlates in spontaneous child-directed speech in German. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Antwerp.
Silverman, K. E. & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1990). The timing of prenuclear high accents in English. In Kingston, J. & Beckman, M. E. (eds), Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and the physics of speech, 72106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Singh, L. (2008). Influences of high and low variability on infant word recognition. Cognition 106(2), 833–70.
Singh, L., Morgan, J. L. & White, K. S. (2004). Preference and processing: the role of speech affect in early spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 51(2), 173–89.
Singh, L., White, K. S. & Morgan, J. L. (2008). Building a word-form lexicon in the face of variable input: influences of pitch and amplitude on early spoken word recognition. Language Learning and Development 4(2), 157–78.
Thiessen, E. D. & Erickson, L. C. (2013). Discovering words in fluent speech: the contribution of two kinds of statistical information. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 590.
Thiessen, E. D., Hill, E. A. & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy 7, 5371.
Thiessen, E. D. & Saffran, J. R. (2003). When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology 39(4), 706–16.
Thiessen, E. D. & Saffran, J. R. (2004). Spectral tilt as a cue to word segmentation in infancy and adulthood. Perception & Psychophysics 66(5), 779–91.
Truckenbrodt, H. (2007). Upstep on edge tones and on nuclear accents. In Gussenhoven, C. & Riad, T. (eds), Tones and tunes. Vol. 2: experimental studies in word and sentence prosody, 349–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
van Heugten, M. & Johnson, E. K. (2012). Infants exposed to fluent natural speech succeed at cross-gender word recognition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55(2), 554–60.
Vihman, M. M., Nakai, S., DePaolis, R. A. & Hallé, P. (2004). The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language 50(3), 336–53.
Wellmann, C., Holzgrefe, J., Truckenbrodt, H., Wartenburger, I. & Höhle, B. (2012). How each prosodic boundary cue matters: evidence from German infants. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 113.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Wong supplementary material S1
Wong supplementary material

 Word (153 KB)
153 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 61 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 253 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.