Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    Treiman, Rebecca and Wolter, Sloane 2018. Phonological and graphotactic influences on spellers’ decisions about consonant doubling. Memory & Cognition, Vol. 46, Issue. 4, p. 614.
    de Bree, Elise Geelhoed, Jan and van den Boer, Madelon 2018. Overruled!: Implicit cues rather than an orthographic rule determine Dutch children's vowel spelling. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 56, Issue. , p. 30.
    de Bree, Elise van der Ven, Sanne and van der Maas, Han 2017. The Voice of Holland: Allograph Production in Written Dutch Past Tense Inflection. Language Learning and Development, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 215.
    Treiman, Rebecca and Boland, Kelly 2017. Graphotactics and spelling: Evidence from consonant doubling. Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 92, Issue. , p. 254.
    Alegría, Jesús and Carrillo, María-Soledad 2014. Learning to spell words in Spanish: a comparative analysis / La escritura de palabras en castellano: un análisis comparativo. Estudios de Psicología, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 476.
    ×
  • Get access
    Add to cart USD25.00
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register Recommend to librarian

When cues collide: children's sensitivity to letter- and meaning-patterns in spelling words in English*

  • S. H. DEACON (a1), D. LEBLANC (a1) and C. SABOURIN (a1)
Abstract

In many learning situations, we need to determine to which cues to attend, particularly in cases when these cues conflict. These conflicts appear often in English orthography. In two experiments, we asked children to spell two-syllable words that varied on two dimensions: morphological and orthographic structure. In one set of these words, the two sources of information conflicted. Results of Experiment 1 suggest that seven- to nine-year-old children are sensitive to both orthographic and morphological dimensions of words, and that this dual sensitivity sometimes leads to correct spelling and sometimes to incorrect spelling. Results of Experiment 2 suggest that orthographic information dominates young (six-year-old) children's spelling, at least in a case when there is a strong orthographic regularity. Taken together, these experiments suggest that children are sensitive to the multiple dimensions of regularity in English orthography and that this sensitivity can lead to mistakes.

Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © Cambridge University Press 2010
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Hélène Deacon, Psychology Department, Dalhousie University, Life Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4J1. e-mail: helene.deacon@dal.ca
Footnotes
Hide All
[*]

We are grateful for the generous support from the Chignecto Central School Board and the creative spellings from the children in Enfield and Elmsdale elementary schools.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Bourassa, D. C. & Treiman, R. (2008). Morphological constancy in spelling: A comparison of children with dyslexia and typically developing children. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice 14(3), 155–69.
Cassar, M. & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology 89, 631–44.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cole, R. A. & Jakimik, J. (1980). A model for speech perception. In Cole, R. (ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech, 136–63. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Deacon, S. H. (2008). The metric matters: Determining the extent of children's knowledge of morphological spelling regularities. Developmental Science 11, 396–406.
Deacon, S. H. & Bryant, P. E. (2005). What young children do and do not know about the spelling of inflections and derivations. Developmental Science 8, 583–94.
Deacon, S. H. & Bryant, P. E. (2006). Getting to the root: Young writers' sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived words. Journal of Child Language 33, 401–417.
Deacon, S. H., Conrad, N. & Pacton, S. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children's learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology 49, 118–24.
de Jong, M. C., van Engeland, H. & Kemner, C. (2008). Attentional effects of gaze shifts are influenced by emotion and spatial frequency, but not in autism. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry 47, 443–54.
Dewey, G. (1970). Relative frequency of English spellings. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ehri, L. (2005). Learning to read words: Theories, findings and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading 9, 167–88.
Ferreiro, E. & Teberosky, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In Patterson, K., Coltheart, M. & Marshall, J. (eds), Surface dyslexia, 301–330. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hayes, H., Treiman, R. & Kessler, B. (2006). Children use vowels to help them spell consonants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 94, 27–42.
Henderson, E. (1985). Teaching spelling. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Howell, D. C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd edn.Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
Johnson, E. K. & Seidl, A. H. (2009). At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics. Developmental Science 12, 131–41.
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A. & Redanz, N. J. (1993). Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development 64, 675–87.
Kemp, N. (2006). Children's spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 19, 737–65.
Lehtonen, A. & Bryant, P. (2005). Doublet challenge: Form comes before function in children's understanding of their orthography. Developmental Science 8, 211–17.
Nunes, T., Bryant, P. & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology 33, 637–49.
Pacton, S. & Deacon, S. H. (2008). The timing and mechanisms of children's use of morphological information in spelling: A review of evidence from French and English. Cognitive Development 23, 339–59.
Pacton, S., Fayol, M. & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children's implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development 76, 324–39.
Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M. & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130, 401–426.
Pollo, T. C., Treiman, R. & Kessler, B. (2008). Three perspectives on spelling development. In Grigorenko, E. J. & Naples, A. (eds), Single-word reading: Cognitive, behavioral, and biological perspectives, 175–190. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C. & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with ‘the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy’: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Memory and Language 41, 416–26.
Read, C. (1986). Children's creative spelling. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M. & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology 94, 143–74.
Solso, R. L. (1979). Bigram and trigram frequencies and versatilities in the English language. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 11(5), 475–84.
Solso, R. L. & King, J. F. (1976). Frequency and versatility of letters in the English language. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 8(3), 283–86.
Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Treiman, R. & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children's spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 63, 141–70.
Treiman, R., Cassar, M. & Zukowski, A. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. Child Development 65, 1318–37.
Waters, G. S., Bruck, M. & Malus-Abramovitz, M. (1988). The role of linguistic and visual information in spelling: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 45, 400–421.
Zeno, S. (ed.) (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. Brewster, NJ: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 38 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 156 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Cancel
Confirm
×