Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-6thx7 Total loading time: 0.29 Render date: 2021-10-26T18:58:08.154Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Capacity of milk composition to identify the feeding system used to feed dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2017

Fernando Vicente*
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Villaviciosa (Asturias), Spain
Carme Santiago
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Villaviciosa (Asturias), Spain
José D Jiménez-Calderón
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Villaviciosa (Asturias), Spain
Adela Martínez-Fernández
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Villaviciosa (Asturias), Spain
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: fvicente@serida.org

Abstract

This Research Paper addresses the hypothesis that is possible to identify the type of feed used for dairy cows by means of the analysis of milk composition and the fatty acid profile of milk fat. Sixteen dairy farms were monitored during 1 year with quarterly visits between summer 2014 and spring 2015. Rations varied throughout the year due to annual dynamic change of forage production, forage rotation, variation of nutrient requirements according to physiological state of the animal, etc. The ingredients of the rations were analysed by cluster identifying five feeding systems based on the main ingredient of the diet: grazing, maize silage, grass silage, dry forage and concentrate. Milk composition could explain up to 91·3% of the total variability among feeding systems, while fatty acid profile could explain only up to 61·2% of total variability. However, when the sum of types of fatty acids and their ratios are taken, up to 93·5% of total variability could be explained. The maize silage system had the greatest milk yield, protein, solid non-fat and urea proportions, as well as the highest proportion of saturated fatty acid and lowest concentration of trans11 18 : 1, cis9 18 : 1 and 18 : 3 n3. Principal component analysis distinguishes the maize silage system from other feeding systems, both from milk composition and milk fatty acid profile. Concentrate system overlapped partially with the grazing, grass silage and dry forage systems. The latter systems had the highest concentrations of cis9 18 : 1, trans11 18 : 1 and 18 : 3, but there was no clear differentiation among them.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argamentería, A, Vicente, F, Martínez-Fernández, A, Cueto, MA & Roza-Delgado, B 2006 Influence of partial total mixed rations amount on the grass voluntary intake by dairy cows. Grassland Science in Europe 11 161163 Google Scholar
Bargo, F, Muller, LD, Delahoy, JE & Cassidy, TW 2002 Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science 85 29482963 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borreani, G, Coppa, M, Revello-Chion, A, Comino, L, Giaccone, D, Ferlay, A & Tabacco, E 2013 Effect of different feeding strategies in intensive dairy farming systems on milk fatty acid profile, and implications on feeding costs in Italy. Journal of Dairy Science 96 68406855 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, G, Collomb, M, Rehberger, B, Sanderson, R, Eyre, M & Leifert, C 2009 Conjugated linoleic acid isomer concentrations in milk from high- and low-input management dairy systems. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 89 697705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capuano, E, Van der Veer, G, Boerrigter-Eenling, R, Elgersma, A, Rademaker, J, Sterian, A & Van Ruth, SM 2014 Verification of fresh grass feeding, pasture grazing and organic farming by cows farm milk fatty acid profile. Food Chemistry 164 234241 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elgersma, A, Tamminga, S & Ellen, G 2006 Modifying milk composition through forage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131 207225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griinari, JM & Bauman, DE 2006 Milk fat depression: concepts, mechanisms and management. In Ruminant Physiology: Digestion, Metabolism and Impact of Nutrition on Gene Expression, Immunology and Stress, pp. 3892291 (Eds Sejrsen, K, Hvelplund, T & Nielsen, MO). Netherlands: Wageningen Google Scholar
Hernández-Ortega, M, Martínez-Fernández, A, Soldado, A, González, A, Arriaga-Jordán, CM, Argamentería, A, de la Roza-Delgado, B & Vicente, F 2014 Effect of total mixed ration composition and daily grazing pattern on milk production, composition and fatty acids profile of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 81 471478 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiménez-Calderón, JD, Santiago, C, Martínez-Fernández, A & Vicente, F 2015 Current state of the feeding systems for dairy cows in the Principality of Asturias (Spain). Grassland Science in Europe 20 105106 Google Scholar
Kay, JK, Roche, JR, Kolver, ES, Thomson, NA & Baumgard, LH 2005 A comparison between feeding systems (pasture and TMR) and the effect of vitamin E supplementation on plasma and milk fatty acid profiles in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 73 322332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knaus, W 2016 Perspectives on pasture versus indoor feeding of dairy cows. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 96 917 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, MK, Andersen, KK, Kaufmann, N & Wiking, L 2014 Seasonal variation in the composition and melting behavior of milk fat. Journal of Dairy Science 97 47034712 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, C, Schingoethe, DJ & Stegeman, GA 2000 Corn distillers grains versus blend of protein supplements with or without ruminally protected amino acids for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83 20752084 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luykx, DM & van Ruth, SM 2008 An overview of analytical methods for determining the geographical origin of food products. Food Chemistry 107 897911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, B, Cornu, A, Kondjoyan, N, Ferlay, A, Verdier-Metz, I, Pradel, P & Berdagué, JL 2005 Milk indicators for recognizing the types of forages eaten by dairy cows. EAAP Publication 112 127136 Google Scholar
Martínez-Fernández, A, Argamntería, A & Roza Delgado, B 2014 Manejo de forrajes para ensilar. In [Management of Forages for Silage] (Ed Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario del Principado de Asturias). Villaviciosa, Spain: SERIDA. http://www.serida.org/pdfs/6079.pdf (In Spanish)Google Scholar
McCarthy, B, Delaby, L, Pierce, KM, Journot, F & Horan, B 2011 Meta-analysis of the impact of stocking rate on the productivity of pasture-based milk production systems. Animal 5 784794 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitani, T, Kobayashi, K, Ueda, K & Kondo, S 2016 Discrimination of ‘grazing milk’ using milk fatty acid profile in the grassland dairy area in Hokkaido. Animal Science Journal 87 233241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales-Almaráz, E, de la Roza-Delgado, B, González, A, Soldado, A, Rodríguez, ML, Peláez, M & Vicente, F 2011 Effect of feeding system on unsaturated fatty acid levels in milk of dairy cows. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 26 224229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nousiainen, J, Schingfield, KJ & Huhtanen, P 2004 Evaluation of milk urea nitrogen as a diagnostic of protein feeding. Journal of Dairy Science 87 386398 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NRC 2001 Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th rev. edn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press Google ScholarPubMed
R Core Team, 2014 R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical computing. Vienna (Austria). https://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
Shingfield, KJ, Bonnet, M & Scollan, ND 2013 Recent developments in altering the fatty acid composition of ruminant-derived foods. Animal 7 132162 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simopoulos, AP 2002 The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 56 365379 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slots, T, Butler, G, Leifert, C, Kristensen, T, Skibsted, LH & Nielsen, JH 2009 Potentials to differentiate milk composition by different feeding strategies. Journal of Dairy Science 92 20572066 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Średnicka-Tober, D, Barański, M, Seal, CJ, Sanderson, R, Benbrook, C, Steinshamn, H, Gromadzka-Ostrowska, J, Rembiałkowska, E, Skwarło-Sońta, K, Eyre, M, Cozzi, G, Larsen, MK, Jordon, T, Niggli, U, Sakowski, T, Calder, PC, Burdge, GC, Sotiraki, S, Stefanakis, A, Stergiadis, S, Yolcu, H, Chatzidimitriou, E, Butler, G, Stewart, G & Leifert, C 2016 Higher PUFA and n-3 PUFA, conjugated linoleic acid, α-tocopherol and iron, but lower iodine and selenium concentrations in organic milk: a systematic literature review and meta- and redundancy analyses. British Journal of Nutrition 115 10431060 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, JD 1989 Altering milk-composition by feeding. Journal of Dairy Science 72 28012814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troegeler-Meynadier, A, Bret-Bennis, L & Enjalbert, F 2006 Rates and efficiencies of reactions of ruminal biohydrogenation of linoleic acid according to pH and polyunsaturated fatty acids concentrations. Reproduction Nutrition Development 46 713724 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valenti, B, Martin, B, Andueza, D, Leroux, C, Labonne, C, Lahalle, F, Larroque, H, Brunschwig, P, Lecomte, C, Brochard, M & Ferlay, A 2013 Infrared spectroscopic methods for the discrimination of cows’ milk according to the feeding system, cow breed and altitude of the dairy farm. International Dairy Journal 32 2632 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, H, Schukking, S & Van der Berg, R 2015 Fifty years of forage supply on dairy farms in the Netherlands. Grassland Science in Europe 20 1220 Google Scholar
Vlaeminck, B, Fievez, V, Cabrita, ARJ, Fonseca, AJM & Dewhurst, RJ 2006 Factors affecting odd-and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131 389417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, GP, Dunshea, FR & Doyle, PT 2004 Effects of nutrition and management on the production and composition of milk fat and protein: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55 10091028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westreicher-Kristen, E, Kaiser, R, Steingass, H & Rodehutscord, M 2014 Effect of feeding dried distillers’ grains with solubles on milk yield and milk composition of cows in mid-lactation and digestibility in sheep. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 98 347356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, JD, Richardson, RI, Nute, GR, Fisher, AV, Campo, MM, Kasapidou, E, Sheard, PR & Enser, M 2003 Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Science 66 2132 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Capacity of milk composition to identify the feeding system used to feed dairy cows
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Capacity of milk composition to identify the feeding system used to feed dairy cows
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Capacity of milk composition to identify the feeding system used to feed dairy cows
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *