Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-p4gdp Total loading time: 0.216 Render date: 2022-03-02T22:14:16.611Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Rapid discrimination between buffalo and cow milk and detection of adulteration of buffalo milk with cow milk using synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy in combination with multivariate methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Serap Durakli Velioglu*
Affiliation:
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Namik Kemal University, 59030 Tekirdag, Turkey
Elif Ercioglu
Affiliation:
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
Ismail Hakki Boyaci
Affiliation:
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: svelioglu@nku.edu.tr

Abstract

This research paper describes the potential of synchronous fluorescence (SF) spectroscopy for authentication of buffalo milk, a favourable raw material in the production of some premium dairy products. Buffalo milk is subjected to fraudulent activities like many other high priced foodstuffs. The current methods widely used for the detection of adulteration of buffalo milk have various disadvantages making them unattractive for routine analysis. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the potential of SF spectroscopy in combination with multivariate methods for rapid discrimination between buffalo and cow milk and detection of the adulteration of buffalo milk with cow milk. SF spectra of cow and buffalo milk samples were recorded between 400–550 nm excitation range with Δλ of 10–100 nm, in steps of 10 nm. The data obtained for ∆λ = 10 nm were utilised to classify the samples using principal component analysis (PCA), and detect the adulteration level of buffalo milk with cow milk using partial least square (PLS) methods. Successful discrimination of samples and detection of adulteration of buffalo milk with limit of detection value (LOD) of 6% are achieved with the models having root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) and the root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV) and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) values of 2, 7, and 4%, respectively. The results reveal the potential of SF spectroscopy for rapid authentication of buffalo milk.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrimonti, C, Pirondini, A, Marmiroli, M & Marmiroli, N 2015 A quadruplex PCR (qxPCR) assay for adulteration in dairy products. Food Chemistry 187 5864 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, EM, Christensen, J, Frederiksen, CS & Haugaard, VK 2003 Front-face fluorescence spectroscopy and chemometrics in analysis of yogurt: rapid analysis of riboflavin. Journal of Dairy Science 86 25082515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blecker, C, Habib-Jiwan, JM & Karoui, R 2012 Effect of heat treatment of rennet skim milk induced coagulation on the rheological properties and molecular structure determined by synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy and turbiscan. Food Chemistry 135 18091817 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyaci, IH, Temiz, HT, Genis, HE, Soykut, EA, Yazgan, NN, Guven, B, Uysal, RS, Bozkurt, AG, Ilaslan, K, Torun, O & Seker, FCD 2015 Dispersive and FT-Raman spectroscopic methods in food analysis. Rsc Advances 5 5660656624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Standards Institution 1955 Gerber Method for the Determination of Fat in Milk and Milk Products. London: British Standards Institution Google Scholar
Czerwenka, C, Muller, L & Lindner, W 2010 Detection of the adulteration of water buffalo milk and mozzarella with cow's milk by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of beta-lactoglobulin variants. Food Chemistry 122 901908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dankowska, A, Malecka, M & Kowalewski, W 2014 Application of synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy with multivariate data analysis for determination of butter adulteration. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 49 26282634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dankowska, A, Maecka, M & Kowalewski, W 2015 Detection of plant oil addition to cheese by synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy. Dairy Science and Technology 95 413424 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enne, G, Elez, D, Fondrini, F, Bonizzi, I, Feligini, M & Aleandri, R 2005 High-performance liquid chromatography of governing liquid to detect illegal bovine milk's addition in water buffalo Mozzarella: comparison with results from raw milk and cheese matrix. Journal of Chromatography A 1094 169174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuselli, F, Deluca, A, Montepeloso, EA, Ibba, G, Tidona, F, Longo, L & Marianella, RM 2015 Detection of fraudulent addition of bovine whey in water buffalo ricotta cheese by isoelectric focusing. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 95 27572762 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammami, M, Rouissi, H, Salah, N, Selmi, H, Al-Otaibi, M, Blecker, C & Karoui, R 2010 Fluorescence spectroscopy coupled with factorial discriminant analysis technique to identify sheep milk from different feeding systems. Food Chemistry 122 13441350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubert, P, Nguyen-Huu, JJ, Boulanger, B, Chapuzet, E, Chiap, P, Cohen, N, Compagnon, PA, Dewe, W, Feinberg, M, Lallier, M, Laurentie, M, Mercier, N, Muzard, G, Nivet, C, Valat, L & Rozet, E 2007 Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures – A SFSTP proposal – Part II. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 45 7081 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurley, IP, Coleman, RC, Ireland, HE & Williams, JHH 2004 Measurement of bovine IgG by indirect competitive ELISA as a means of detecting milk adulteration. Journal of Dairy Science 87 543549 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IDF 2002 Milk and Milk Products: Determination of Nitrogen Content : Routine Method Using Combustion According to the Dumas Principle. International Dairy Federation, Geneva, Switzerland Google Scholar
IDF 2014 The World Dairy Situation 2014, pp. 1230, International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium Google Scholar
Karoui, R, Martin, B & Dufour, E 2005 Potentiality of front-face fluorescence spectroscopy to determine the geographic origin of milks from the Haute-Loire department (France). Lait 85 223236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennard, RW & Stone, LA 1969 Computer aided design of experiments. Technometrics 11 137148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H, Han, DH & Wang, SP 2014 Potentiality of synchronous fluorescence technology for determination of reconstituted milk adulteration in fresh milk. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis 34 26852689 Google ScholarPubMed
Patra, D & Mishra, AK 2002 Recent developments in multi-component synchronous fluorescence scan analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 21 787798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadecka, J & Tothova, J 2007 Fluorescence spectroscopy and chemometrics in the food classification – a review. Czech Journal of Food Sciences 25 159173 Google Scholar
Sikorska, E, Gorecki, T, IV, K, Sikorski, M & Koziol, J 2005 Classification of edible oils using synchronous scanning fluorescence spectroscopy. Food Chemistry 89 217225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, CS 2008 Efficient Dairy Buffalo Production. Sweden: DeLaval Google Scholar
Zaidi, F, Rouissi, H, Dridi, S, Kammoun, M, De Baerdemaeker, J & Karoui, R 2008 Front-face fluorescence spectroscopy as a rapid and non-destructive tool for differentiating between sicilo-sarde and comisana Ewe's milk during lactation period: a preliminary study. Food and Bioprocess Technology 1 143151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Durakli Velioglu supplementary material

Durakli Velioglu supplementary material

Download Durakli Velioglu supplementary material(File)
File 365 KB
14
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Rapid discrimination between buffalo and cow milk and detection of adulteration of buffalo milk with cow milk using synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy in combination with multivariate methods
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Rapid discrimination between buffalo and cow milk and detection of adulteration of buffalo milk with cow milk using synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy in combination with multivariate methods
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Rapid discrimination between buffalo and cow milk and detection of adulteration of buffalo milk with cow milk using synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy in combination with multivariate methods
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *