Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:33:30.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diagnosis of intramammary infection in samples yielding negative results or minor pathogens in conventional bacterial culturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2010

Ricardo Bexiga*
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
Mikko T Koskinen
Affiliation:
Finnzymes Oy, Keilaranta 16A, FI-02150 Espoo, Finland
Jani Holopainen
Affiliation:
Finnzymes Oy, Keilaranta 16A, FI-02150 Espoo, Finland
Carla Carneiro
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
Helena Pereira
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
Kathryn A Ellis
Affiliation:
Scottish Centre for Production Animal Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, G61 1QH, United Kingdom
Cristina L Vilela
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
*
*For correspondence: adrbexiga@fmv.utl.pt

Abstract

Up to half of quarter milk samples submitted for mastitis diagnosis are culture-negative results or lead to identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci or Corynebacterium bovis in conventional culturing, the so-called minor pathogens. The interpretation and usefulness of these results in terms of udder and animal health management is limited, even though the amount of resources spent is relatively high. This work aimed to test two methods of analysis of milk samples with the goal of increasing detection of intramammary pathogens. In the first study, 783 milk samples were processed in duplicate: before and after freezing at −20°C for 24 h, using standard bacteriological techniques. There was a significant difference between the two methods with samples frozen for 24 h yielding significantly fewer Gram-positive catalase-positive cocci, Gram-negative bacilli, Gram-positive bacilli and significantly more samples leading to no growth, than samples before freezing. The number of samples yielding Gram-positive catalase-negative cocci was not significantly affected by freezing. In the second study, a real-time PCR-based test was performed on milk samples with an individual quarter somatic cell count above 500 000 cells/ml that were either negative (n=51 samples) or that led to the isolation of minor pathogens in culturing: Corynebacterium bovis (n=79 samples) or non-aureus staphylococci (NAS, n=32). A mastitis pathogen, beyond the result obtained with standard bacteriology, was detected on 47% of the no-growth samples, on 35% of the samples from which C. bovis had been isolated and on 25% of the samples from which NAS had been isolated. The most commonly detected major pathogen was Escherichia coli, followed by Streptococcus uberis, Arcanobacterium pyogenes/Peptoniphilus indolicus and Streptococcus dysgalactiae. These results suggest that simply freezing milk samples for 24 h does not increase the detection of intramammary bacteria in milk samples and therefore should not be recommended. However, use of the real-time PCR-based test may be useful in diagnosing intramammary infections when milk samples with high somatic cell counts are culture-negative or when culturing results in the detection of minor pathogens.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, RT, Marshall, RT & Bourland, CT 1972 Locus of mammary gland infections of Corynebacterium bovis. Journal of Dairy Science 55 413416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, AJ, Leach, KA, Breen, JE, Green, LE & Green, MJ 2007 Survey of the incidence and the aetiology of mastitis on dairy farms in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 160 253258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouillette, E, Grondin, G, Shkreta, L, Lacasse, P & Talbot, BG 2003 In vivo and in vitro demonstration that Staphylococcus aureus is an intracellular pathogen in the presence or absence of fibronectin-binding proteins. Microbial Pathogenesis 35 159168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinsmore, RP, English, PB, Gonzalez, RN & Sears, PM 1992 Use of augmented cultural techniques in the diagnosis of the bacterial cause of clinical bovine mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 75 27062712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honkanen-Buzalski, T & Bramley, AJ 1984 Observations on Corynebacterium bovis infection of the mammary gland II. Experimental infection. Journal of Dairy Research 51 379385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Dairy Federation 1999 Suggested interpretation of mastitis terminology. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation No. 338. Brussels, Belgium: IDFGoogle Scholar
Koskinen, MT, Holopainen, J, Pyörälä, S, Bredbacka, P, Pitkälä, A, Barkema, HW, Bexiga, R, Roberson, J, Sølverød, L, Piccinini, R, Kelton, D, Lehmusto, H, Niskala, S & Salmikivi, L 2009 Analytical specificity and sensitivity of a real time polymerase chain reaction assay for identification of bovine mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science 92 952959CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makovec, JA & Ruegg, PL 2003 Results of milk samples submitted for microbiological examination in Wisconsin from 1994 to 2001. Journal of Dairy Science 86 34663472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NMC 1999 Laboratory Handbook of Bovine Mastitis. Madison WI, USA: National Mastitis CouncilGoogle Scholar
Pitkälä, A, Haveri, M, Pyörälä, S, Myllys, V & Honkanen-Buzalski, T 2004 Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001 – Prevalence, distribution of bacteria and antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Dairy Science 87 24332441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampimon, OC, Zadoks, R, De Vliegher, S, Supré, K, Haesebrouck, F, Barkema, HW, Sol, J & Lam, TJGM 2009 Performance of API Staph ID32 and Staph-Zym for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine milk samples. Veterinary Microbiology 136 300305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schukken, YH, Grommer, FJ, Smit, JA, Vandeeger, D & Brand, A 1989 Effect of freezing on bacteriological culturing of mastitis milk samples. Journal of Dairy Science 72 19001906CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sears, PM, Smith, BS, English, PB, Herer, PS & Gonzalez, RN 1990 Shedding pattern of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science 73 27852789CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, BO, Caraviello, DZ, Rodrigues, AC & Ruegg, PL 2005 Evaluation of Petrifilm for the isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from milk samples. Journal of Dairy Science 88 30003008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simojoki, H, Orro, T, Taponen, S & Pyörälä, S 2009 Host response in bovine mastitis experimentally induced with Staphylococcus chromogenes. Veterinary Microbiology 134 9599CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sol, J, Sampimon, OC, Hartman, E & Barkema, HW 2002 Effect of preculture freezing and incubation on bacteriological isolation from subclinical mastitis samples. Veterinary Microbiology 85 241249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamilselvam, B, Almeida, RA, Dunlap, JR & Oliver, JP 2006 Streptococcus uberis internalizes and persists in bovine mammary epithelial cells. Microbial Pathogenesis 40 279285CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taponen, S, Salmiviki, L, Simojoki, H, Koskinen, MT & Pyörälä, S 2009 Real-time polymerase chain reaction-based identification of bacteria in milk samples from bovine clinical mastitis with no growth in conventional culturing. Journal of Dairy Science 92 26102617CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ternent, HE, Innocent, GT, Filshie, LM, Taylor, DJ, Steele, WB, McEwen, SA, Reilly, WJ, Gunn, GJ, Reid, SW & Mellor, DJ 2004 Frozen storage of Escherichia coli O157 in buffered peptone water and its detection on bovine carcasses. Journal of Food Protection 67 4045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, JL, Lowery, DE, Teel, JF & Rossbach, S 2000 Identification of Corynebacterium bovis and other coryneforms from bovine mammary glands. Journal of Dairy Science 83 23732379CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, DJ, Gonzalez, RN & Das, HH 1997 Bovine mastitis pathogens in New York and Pennsylvania: prevalence and effects on somatic cell count and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 80 25922598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zecconi, A, Piccinini, R, Zepponi, A & Ruffo, G 1997 Recovery of Staphylococcus aureus from centrifuged quarter milk samples. Journal of Dairy Science 80 30583063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed