Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Information and Heterogeneity in Issue Voting: Evidence from the 2008 Presidential Election in Taiwan

  • Dean Lacy and Emerson M. S. Niou

Extract

A voter's capacity to acquire and retain information moderates the relationship between issues and the vote. Issues differ in their distance from the voter's personal experience. Proximate issues, such as personal economic conditions, affect the vote decisions of highly informed and less informed voters equally. Distant issues, such as national economic conditions and foreign affairs, affect the vote of highly informed voters but not less informed voters. The 2008 presidential election on Taiwan provides a critical test of the effect of information on issue voting. Unification with mainland China versus Taiwan independence is the most important issue in the 2008 election, and voters with higher levels of political information show a larger effect of the issue on their vote. The national economy is also a significant predictor of vote choice, but only for highly informed voters. Personal economic conditions and other proximate issues are not significant predictors of the vote at any information level.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Information and Heterogeneity in Issue Voting: Evidence from the 2008 Presidential Election in Taiwan
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Information and Heterogeneity in Issue Voting: Evidence from the 2008 Presidential Election in Taiwan
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Information and Heterogeneity in Issue Voting: Evidence from the 2008 Presidential Election in Taiwan
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aldrich, John H., Sullivan, John L., and Borgida, Eugene. 1989. “Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates ‘Waltz Before a Blind Audience’?” American Political Science Review 83, 1: 123141.
Almond, Gabriel. 1950. The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Althaus, Scott. 1998. “Information Effects in Collective Preferences.” American Political Science Review 92, 1: 545558.
Althaus, Scott. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Barabas, Jason, and Jerit, Jennifer. 2010. “Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?” American Political Science Review 104, 2: 226242.
Baron, Reuben M., and Kenny, David A.. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 6: 11731182.
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40, 1: 194230.
Central Intelligence Agency. 2010. The World Factbook: Taiwan. August. Available at www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tw.html.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent , ed. Apter, David E.. New York: Free Press.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Duch, Raymond M. 2001. “A Development Model of Heterogeneous Voting in New Democracies.” American Political Science Review 95, 4: 895910.
Duch, Raymond M., and Stevenson, Randy T.. 2006. “Assessing the Magnitude of the Economic Vote Over Time and Across Nations.” Electoral Studies 25, 3: 528547.
Duch, Raymond M., and Stevenson, Randy T.. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Godbout, Jean-François, and Bélanger, Éric. 2007. “Economic Voting and Political Sophistication: A Reassessment.” Political Research Quarterly 60, 3: 541554.
Gomez, Brad, and Wilson, Matthew. 2001. “Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution.” American Journal of Political Science 45, 4: 899914.
Gomez, Brad, and Wilson, Matthew. 2006. “Cognitive Heterogeneity and Economic Voting: A Comparative Analysis of Four Democratic Electorates.” American Journal of Political Science 50, 1: 127145.
Gomez, Brad, and Wilson, Matthew. 2007. “Economic Voting and Political Sophistication: Defending Heterogenous Attributon.” Political Research Quarterly 60: 555558.
Goren, Paul. 1997. Political Expertise and Issue Voting. Political Research Quarterly 50, 2: 387412.
Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng, Lacy, Dean P., and Niou, Emerson M. S.. 1998. “Retrospective and Prospective Voting in a One-Party-Dominant Democracy: Taiwan's 1996 Presidential Election.” Public Choice 97: 383399.
Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng, Lacy, Dean P., and Niou, Emerson M. S.. 2003. “Retrospective vs. Prospective Voting in Taiwan's 2001 Legislative Yuan Elections.” Paper presented at the Conference on Electoral Politics in Taiwan, University of South Carolina, April 11.
Kinder, Donald, and Kiewiet, Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11, 2: 129161.
Lacy, Dean, and Christenson, Dino. 2007. “Information and Heterogeneity in Economic Voting.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September.
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lavine, Howard, Borgida, Eugene, Sullivan, John L., and Thomsen, Cynthia J.. 1996. “The Relationship of National and Personal Issue Salience to Attitude Accessibility on Foreign and Domestic Policy Issues.” Political Psychology 17: 293316.
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 211.
Li, Yitan, James, Patrick, and Cooper Drury, A.. 2009. “Diversionary Dragons, or ‘Talking Tough in Taipei’: Cross-Strait Relations in the New Millennium.” Journal of East Asian Studies 9, 3: 369398.
Luskin, Robert. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31: 856899.
Mondak, Jeffrey J., Mutz, Diana C., and Huckfeldt, Robert. 1996. “Persuasion in Context: The Multilevel Structure of Economic Evaluations.” In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change , ed. Mutz, Diana C., Sniderman, Paul M., and Brody, Richard A., 249266. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Page, Benjamin I., and Barabas, Jason. 2000. “Foreign Policy Gaps Between Citizens and Leaders.” International Studies Quarterly 44, 3: 339364.
RePass, David E. 1971. “Issue Salience and Party Choice.” American Political Science Review 65, 2: 389400.
Rivers, Douglas. 1988. “Heterogeneity in Models of Electoral Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 32, 3: 737757.
Sniderman, Paul M., Glaser, James M., and Griffin, Robert. 1990. “Information and Electoral Choice.” In Information and Democratic Processes , ed. Ferejohn, John A. and Kuklinski, James H., 117135. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Tahk, Alexander, Krosnick, Jon, Lacy, Dean, and Lowe, Laura. 2010. “Do the News Media Shape How Americans Think About Politics? New Statistical Procedures Cast New Light on an Old Hypothesis.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September.
Taiwan Election and Democratization Study (TEDS). 2008. TEDS survey data available at http://www.tedsnet.org/cubekm2/front/bin/home.phtml.
Trading Economics. 2011. Taiwan GDP Growth Rate. Available at www.tradingeconomics.com/taiwan/gdp-growth (accessed August 7, 2011).
Zaller, John. 1985a. “Proposal for the Measurement of Political Information.” Report to the NES Board of Overseers, Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan. In The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion , ed. Zaller, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John. 1985b. “Analysis of Information Items in the 1985 NES Pilot Study.” Report to the NES Board of Overseers, Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan. In The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion , ed. Zaller, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of East Asian Studies
  • ISSN: 1598-2408
  • EISSN: 2234-6643
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-east-asian-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed