Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Big Business, Growth, and Decline

  • G. N. von Tunzelmann (a1)
Abstract

The downside of Chandler's success is that it has placed the large enterprise and the American economy on a pedestal, next to which eveiy other case appears a fumbling effort towards their apparent virtues. As some of the individual country studies in CAH show, well before even Chandler set out on this mission, American management consultants such as McKinsey were “exporting” the M-form company structure as their nostrum for all the world's business ills. As is shown in Fear's chapter and in several others, this involved a very simplistic diagnosis ofwhat those ills consisted of. The M-form conferred substantial advantages at a certain time and place in the evolution of industry, but it was no panacea. Furthermore, as I have suggested previously, its aetiology for comprehending its own prognoses was too shallow.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Prees, 1977.
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1990.
Fisher, Franklin M., and Temin, Peter. “Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?Journal of Political Economy 81, no 1. (1973): 5670.
Galambos, Louis, and Sewell, Jane E.. Networks of Innovation: Vaccine Development at Merch Sharp Dohme, and Mulford, 1895–1995. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Hounshell, David A., and Smith, John K. Jr, Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D, 1902–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Kozul-Wright, R. “The Myth of Anglo-Saxon Capitalism: Reconstructing the History of the American State.” In The Role of the State in Economic Change, edited by Chang, Ha-Joon and Rowthorn, Robert, 81113. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
Leonard-Barton, Dorothy. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Susraining the Sources of Innovation. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Mowery, David C. “The Boundaries of the U.S. Firm in R&D.” In Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise, edited by Lamoureaux, Naomi R. and Raff, Daniel M. G., 147–82. Chicago: NBER/University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Mowery, David C., and Rosenberg, Nathan. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Takeuchi, Hiro. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Prais, S. J.. The Evolution of Giant Firms in Britain: A Study of the Growth of Concentration in Manufacturing Industry in Britain, 1909–70. Cambridge: NlESR Cambridge University Press, 1976.
Scazzieri, Roberto. A Theory of Production: Tasks, Processes, and Technical Practices. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
von Tunzelmann, G. N.. “The Supply Side: Theory and History.” In Industrial Dynamics, edited by Carlsson, Bo, 5584. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press, 1989.
von Tunzelmann, G. N.. Industry and Technical Progress. The Foundations of Economic Growth. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1995.
von Tunzelmann, G. N.Time-Saving Technical Change: The Cotton Industry in the English Industrial Revolution.” Explorations in Economic History 32, no. 1 (1995): 127.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Economic History
  • ISSN: 0022-0507
  • EISSN: 1471-6372
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed