Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:57:56.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decomposing U.S. Regional Incomes: A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Sukkoo Kim
Sukkoo Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years there has been a resurgence of interest in the phenomenon of economic growth. The interest was sparked by the introduction of new models by Paul Romer and Robert Lucas. The neoclassical Solow growth model, despite its influence over the years, has a fundamental flaw: growth is determined exogenously. The new models by Romer and Lucas solve for the growth rate of the economy endogenously. In these models, due to spillovers in capital or in human capital, growth can go on indefinitely. In a later work, Romer argued that increasing returns are necessary elements in models of technological innovations, which in turn form the foundation for endogenous growth models. The theoretical innovations in modeling growth stimulated a significant body of empirical work.

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 779 - 786
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barro, Robert, and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. “Convergence across States and Regions.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 1, (1991): 107–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert, and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.Google Scholar
Carlino, Gerald, and Mills, Leonard. “Are U.S. Regional Incomes Converging? A Time Series Analysis.” Journal of Monetary Economics 32, no. 3 (1993): 335–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, Francesco, and Coleman, Wilber II. “How Regions Converge.” mimeo, 1998.Google Scholar
Davis, Donald. “The Home Market, Trade, and Industrial Structure.” American Economic Review 88, no. 5 (1998): 1264–76.Google Scholar
Davis, Donald, and Weinstein, David. “Market Access, Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Assessment.” NBER working paper 6,787 (1998).Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, and Stiglitz, Joseph. “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.” American Economic Review 67, no. 3 (1977): 297–308.Google Scholar
Dumais, Guy, Ellison, Glenn, and Glaeser, Edward. “Geographic Concentration as a Dynamic Process.” mimeo (1998).Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard. “Interregional Differences in Per Capita Income, Population, and Total Income, 1840–1950.” In Trends in the American Economy in the Nineteenth Century. NBER Research, New York: Princeton University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard. “Regional Income Trends, 1840–1950.” In American Economic History, edited by Harris, Seymour, 525–47. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.Google Scholar
Ellison, Glenn, and Glaeser, Edward. “Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 105, no. 5 (1997): 889–927.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert. Without Consent or Contract. New York: W.W. Norton, 1989.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert, and Engerman, Stanley. “Notes on the Explanation of the Growth of Southern per Capita Income, 1840–1860.” In Without Consent or Contract: Evidence and Methods, edited by Fogel, Robert, Galantine, Ralph, and Manning, Richard, 278–82. New York: W.W. Norton, 1988.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward, Kallal, H., Scheinkman, Jose, and Shleifer, Andrei. “Growth in Cities.” Journal of Political Economy 100, no. 6 (1992): 1126–52.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, and Lewis, Frank. “The Economic Cost of the American Civil War.” this JOURNAL 35, no. 2 (1975): 299–326.Google Scholar
Hanna, Frank. “Contribution of Manufacturing Wages to Regional Differences in Per Capita Income.” Review of Economics and Statistics 33, no. 1 (1951): 18–28.Google Scholar
Harrigan, James. “Technology, Factor Supplies and International Specialization: Testing the Neoclassical Model.” American Economic Review 87, no. 4 (1997): 475–94.Google Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan, and Krugman, Paul. Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Henderson, Vernon. “Evidence on Scale Economies and Agglomeration.” mimeo (1999).Google Scholar
Henderson, Vernon, Kuncoro, Ari, and Turner, Matt. “Industrial Development of Cities.” Journal of Political Economy 103, no. 5 (1995): 1067–90.Google Scholar
Kim, Sukkoo. “Expansion of Markets and the Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities: The Trends in U.S. Regional Manufacturing Structure, 1860–1987.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, no. 4 (1995): 883–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sukkoo. “Economic Integration and Convergence: U.S. Regions, 1840–1987.” this JOURNAL 58, no. 3 (1998): 659–83.Google Scholar
Kim, Sukkoo. “Regions, Resource, and Economic Geography: The Sources of U.S. Regional Comparative Advantage, 1880–1987.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 29, no. 1 (1999): 1–32.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 9, no. 4 (1979): 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. “ Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. “Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: 3. Industrial Distribution of Income and Labor Force by States, United States, 1919–1921 to 1955.” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Supplement to Volume 6(1958): 1–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Croix, Sumner. “Economic Integration and Convergence: A Second Decomposition Method.” this JOURNAL 59, no. 3 (1999): 773–78.Google Scholar
La Croix, Sumner and Fishback, Price. “Firm-Specific Evidence on Racial Wage Differentials and Workforce Segregation in Hawaii's Sugar Industry.” Explorations in Economic History 26, no. 4 (1989): 403–23.Google Scholar
Lucas, Robert. “On the Mechanics of Development Planning.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22, no. 1 (1988): 3–42.Google Scholar
Mankiew, Gregory, Romer, David, and Weil, David. “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, no. 2 (1992): 407–37.Google Scholar
Perloff, Harvey. “Interrelations of State Income and Industrial Structure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 39, no.2 (1957): 162–71.Google Scholar
Perloff, Harvey, Dunn, Edgar, Lampard, Eric and Muth, Richard. Regions, Resources, and Economic Growth. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger, and Sutch, Richard. One Kind of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Rhode, Paul. “Evolution of California Manufacturing.” mimeo (1998).Google Scholar
Romer, Paul. “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 94, no. 5 (1986): 1002–37.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98 no. 5, pt. 2, (1990): S71–S102.Google Scholar
Swartz, Charles, and Graham, Robert. “Personal Income by States, 1929–1954.” Survey of Current Business (1955): 12–22.Google Scholar
Trefler, Daniel. “The Case of Missing Trade and Other Mysteries.” American Economic Review 85, no. 5 (1995): 1029–46.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin,. Political Economy of Cotton South. New York: W. W. Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. Old South New South. New York: Basic Books, 1986.Google Scholar