Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    Sun, Sizhong and Anwar, Sajid 2018. Product innovation in China’s food processing industries. Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 42, Issue. 3, p. 492.
    Han, Junghee 2017. Technology Commercialization through Sustainable Knowledge Sharing from University-Industry Collaborations, with a Focus on Patent Propensity. Sustainability, Vol. 9, Issue. 10, p. 1808.
    Khan, B. Zorina 2015. Inventing Prizes: A Historical Perspective on Innovation Awards and Technology Policy. Business History Review, Vol. 89, Issue. 04, p. 631.
    Naqshbandi, M.Muzamil and Kaur, Sharan 2015. Effectiveness of innovation protection mechanisms in Malaysian high-tech sector. Management Research Review, Vol. 38, Issue. 9, p. 952.
    Ambrammal, Sunil Kumar and Sharma, Ruchi 2014. R&D and patenting by firms in India in high- and medium-high-technology industries. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 181.
    Fontana, Roberto Nuvolari, Alessandro Shimizu, Hiroshi and Vezzulli, Andrea 2013. Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977–2004. Research Policy, Vol. 42, Issue. 10, p. 1780.
    Holgersson, Marcus 2013. Patent management in entrepreneurial SMEs: a literature review and an empirical study of innovation appropriation, patent propensity, and motives. R&D Management, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 21.
    ×
  • Get access
    Add to cart USD25.00
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register Recommend to librarian

Did R&D Firms Used to Patent? Evidence from the First Innovation Surveys

  • TOM NICHOLAS (a1)
Abstract

Matching 2,777 R&D firms in surveys conducted by the National Research Council between 1921 and 1938 with U.S. patents reveals that 59 percent of all firms and 88 percent of publicly traded firms patented. These shares are much higher than those observed for modern R&D firms. Industry, firm size and the location of R&D facilities relative to major cities are shown to be important determinants of the propensity to patent. The effect of these factors remained constant across the 1920s and the Depression years suggesting that the tradeoff between patent disclosure and secrecy did not change over time.

Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © The Economic History Association 2011
References
Hide All
Anton, James and Yao, Dennis. “Expropriation and Inventions: Appropriable Rents in the Absence of Property Rights.” American Economic Review 84, no. 1 (1994): 190–209.
Arora, Ashish. “Patents, Licensing, and Market Structure in the Chemical Industry.” Research Policy 26, no. 4–5 (1997): 391–403.
Arundel, Anthony. “The Relative Effectiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation.” Research Policy 30, no. 4 (2001): 611–24.
Atkeson, Andrew, and Patrick, J. Kehoe. “Modeling the Transition to a New Economy: Lessons from Two Technological Revolutions.” American Economic Review 97, no. 1 (2007): 64–88.
Balasubramanian, Natarajan and Sivadasan, Jagadeesh. “What Happens When Firms Patent? New Evidence from U.S. Economic Census Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics 93, no. 1 (2011): 126–46.
Barlevy, Gadi. “On the Cyclicality of Research and Development.” American Economic Review 97, no. 4 (2007): 1131–64.
Bessen, James. “NBER PDP Project User Documentation: Matching Patent Data to Compustat Firms.” NBER Mimeo, 2009.
Bessen, James, and James Meurer, Michael. Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.
Bound, John, Cummins, Clint, Griliches, Zvi, Hall, Bronwyn H., and Jaffe, Adam B.. Who Does R&D and Who Patents? In R&D, Patents, and Productivity, edited by Griliches, Zvi, 21–54. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Brouwer, Erik and Kleinknecht, Alfred. “Innovative Output and a Firm's Propensity to Patent: An Exploration of CIS Micro Data.” Research Policy 28, no. 6 (1999): 615–24.
Cohen, Wesley M., Goto, Akira, Nagata, Akiya, Nelson, Richard and Walsh, John. “R&D Spillovers, Patents, and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States.” Research Policy 31, no. 8 (2002): 1349–67.
Cohen, Wesley M., Nelson, Richard R., and John, P. Walsh. “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not).” NBER Working Paper No. 7552, Cambridge, MA, February 2000.
Commercial and Financial Chronicle. Various years from 1921 through 1938.
David, Paul. “The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 80, no. 2 (1990): 355–61.
Denicolo, Vincenzo and Franzoni, Luigi. “Patents, Secrets, and the First-Inventor Defense.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 13, no. 3 (2004): 517–38.
Field, Alexander. “The Most Technologically Progressive Decade of the Twentieth Century.” American Economic Review 93, no. 4 (2003): 1399–1413.
Field, Alexander. A Great Leap Forward: 1930s Depression and U.S. Economic Growth.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011.
Gallini, Nancy T. “The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, no. 1 (2002): 131–54.
Gans, Joshua S., Hsu, David H. and Stern, Scott. “The Impact of Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights on the Market for Ideas: Evidence from Patent Grant Delays.” Management Science 54, no. 5 (2008): 982–97.
Griliches, Zvi. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth.” Bell Journal of Economics 10, no. 1 (1979): 92–116.
Griliches, Zvi. “Comments and Discussion: Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity no. 3 (1987): 783–831.
Hall, Bronwyn, Jaffe, Adam and Trajtenberg, Manuel. “The NBER Patent-Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools.” In Patents, Citation, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, edited by Jaffe, Adam and Trajtenberg, Manuel, 403–59.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
Harabi, Najib. “Appropriability of Technical Innovations an Empirical Analysis.” Research Policy 24, no. 6 (1995): 981–92.
Holland, M., and Spraragen, W.. Research in Hard Times. Washington DC: National Research Council, 1933.
Hsu, David H., and Ziedonis, R. H.. “Patents as Quality Signals for Entrepreneurial Ventures.” Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 2008.
Jovanovic, Boyan, and Peter, L. Rousseau. “Why Wait? A Century of Life Before IPO.” American Economic Review 91, no. 2 (2001): 336–41.
Kim, Sukkoo. “Expansion of Markets and the Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities: The Tends in U.S. Regional Manufacturing Structure, 1860–1987.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, no. 4 (1995): 881–908.
Kultti, Klaus, Takalo, Tuomas and Toikka, Juuso. “Secrecy versus Patenting.” Rand Journal of Economics 38, no. 1 (2007): 22–42.
Lerner, Josh. “150 Years of Patent Protection.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 92, no. 2 (2002): 221–25.
Lerner, Josh. “The Empirical Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Innovation: Puzzles and Clues.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 99, no. 2 (2009): 343–48.
Levin, Richard C., Klevorick, Alvin K., Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney, G. Winter. “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity no. 3 (1987):783–831.
MacGarvie, Megan, and Jeffrey, L. Furman. “Academic Science and the Birth of Industrial Research Laboratories in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 63, no. 4 (2007): 756–76.
MacGarvie, Megan, and Jeffrey, L. Furman. “Academic Collaboration and Organizational Innovation: the Development of Research Capabilities in the US Pharmaceutical Industry, 1927–1946.” Industrial and Corporate Change 18, no. 5 (2009): 929–61.
Mansfield, Edwin. “Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study.” Management Science 32, no. 2 (1986): 173–82.
McLennan, W. “Innovation in Australian Manufacturing 1994.” Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Catalogue no. 8116.0., 1995.
Moser, Petra. “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs.” American Economic Review 95, no. 4 (2005): 1214–36.
Mowery, David. The Emergence and Growth of Industrial Research in American Manufacturing, 1899–1945. Ph.D. Diss., Stanford University, 1981.
Mowery, David “Industrial Research and Firm Size, Survival, and Growth in American Manufacturing, 1921–1946: An Assessment.” The Journal of Economic History 43, no. 4 (1983): 953–80.
Mowery, David “The Boundaries of the U.S. Firm in Research and Development.” In Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise, edited by Lamoreaux, Naomi and Raff, Daniel, 147–82. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Mowery, David “Development of Industrial Research in U.S. Manufacturing.” American Economic Review 80, no. 2 (2005): 345–49.
Mowery, David, and Rosenberg, Nathan. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Mowery, David, and Rosenberg, Nathan Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in Twentieth Century America.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
National Research Council. Industrial Research Laboratories of the United States. Washington DC: National Research Council. Various years from 1921 through 1938.
Nelson, Richard and Wright, Gavin. “The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar Era in Historical Perspective.” Journal of Economic Literature 30, no. 4 (1992): 1931–64.
Nicholas, Tom. “Spatial Diversity in Invention: Evidence from the Early R&D Labs.” Journal of Economic Geography 9, no. 1 (2009): 1–31.
Nicholas, Tom. “The Role of Independent Invention in U.S. Technological Development, 1880–1930.” The Journal of Economic History 70, no. 1 (2010): 59–84.
Perazich, George, and Philip, M. Field. “Industrial Research and Changing Technology.” Works Progress Administration, National Research Project, 1940.
Pred, Allen R. The Spatial Dynamics of U.S. Urban Industrial Growth, 1800–1914.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.
Raff, Daniel and Trajtenberg, Manuel. “Quality-Adjusted Prices for the American Automobile Industry: 1906–1940.” In The Economics of New Goods, edited by Bresnahan, Timothy F. and Gordon, Robert J., 71–108. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Scherer, F. M. “The Propensity to Patent.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 1, no. 1 (1983): 107–28.
Schmookler, Jacob. Invention and Economic Growth.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.
Scotchmer, Suzanne and Green, Jerry. “Novelty and Disclosure in Patent Law.” Rand Journal of Economics 21, no. 1 (1990): 131–46.
Sokoloff, Kenneth “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence from Patent Records, 1790–1846.” The Journal of Economic History 48, no. 4 (1988): 813–50.
Streb, Jochen. “Catching-Up and Falling Behind? Illegitimate Knowledge Spillover from American to German Machine Tool Makers, 1877–1932.” Hohenheim Mimeo, 2009.
Szostak, Rick. Technological Innovation and the Great Depression. London: Westview Press, 1995.
Thoma, Grid, Torrisi, Salvatore, Gambardella, Alfonso, Guellec, Dominique, Hall, Bronwyn H. and Harhoff, Dietmar. “Harmonizing and Combining Large Datasets: An Application to Firm-Level Patent and Accounting Data.” NBER Working Paper No. 15851, Cambridge, MA, March 2010.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Economic History
  • ISSN: 0022-0507
  • EISSN: 1471-6372
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 38 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 175 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Cancel
Confirm
×